Severe retinopathy of prematurity in big babies in India: History repeating itself?

  • Parag K. Shah
  • V. Narendran
  • N. Kalpana
  • Clare Gilbert
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To describe the characteristics of babies with severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) attending a tertiary referral eye hospital in South India.

Methods

Data on consecutive preterm infants with severe ROP presenting between July 2002 and October 2007 were retrieved from medical records. Severe ROP was defined as high risk prethreshold disease or worse.

Results

144 babies with severe ROP were divided into two groups: group 1 had high risk prethreshold or threshold ROP while group 2 had stages 4 or 5 ROP. The overall mean gestational age was 30.7 weeks (range 25–35 weeks) and the mean birth weight was 1410 g (range 650–2310 g). Most babies had received unmonitored supplemental oxygen (ascertained through discussion with the treating pediatricians).

Conclusion

More bigger and mature babies are developing severe ROP in South India than in industrialized countries. The characteristics of babies affected are similar to those seen during the first epidemic of ROP which occurred during the 1950s in Europe and North America. Guidelines on oxygenation and screening policies should be jointly developed by pediatricians and ophthalmologists to end this epidemic of avoidable blindness in India.

Key words

Retinopathy of prematurity First epidemic Oxygen Childhood blindness 

References

  1. 1.
    WHO’s mission for vision. Afr Health 1998;20:38.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorsby A. The incidence and causes of blindness in England and Wales 1948–1962, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No 114. London: HMSO, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    King M. Retrolental fibroplasia. Arch Ophthalmol 1950;43:694–711.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilbert C, Fielder A, Gordillo L, Quinn G, Semiglia R, Visintin P et al. Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs. Pediatrics 2005;115:e518–e525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patz A. The role of oxygen in retro lental fibroplasias. Tr Am Opth Soc 1968;66:940–985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilbert C, Rahi J, Eckstein M, O’sullivan J, Foster A. Retinopathy of prematurity in middle-income countries. Lancet 1997;350:12–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charan R, Dogra MR, Gupta A, Narang A. The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in a neonatal care unit. Indian J Ophthalmol 1995;43:123–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah PK, Narendran V, Kalpana N, Tawansy KA. Anatomical and visual outcome of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Eye advance online publication, 3 August 2007; doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702939.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    An international committee for the classification of retinopathy of prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:991–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Report of a Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Retinopathy of prematurity: guidelines for screening and treatment. Early Hum Dev 1996;46:239–258.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Errata for Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatrics Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Pediatrics 2006;118:1324.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith LE, Wesoloiuski E, McLellan A, Kostyk SK, D’Amato R, Sullivan R et al. Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy in the Mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:101–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vinekar A, Dogra MR, Sangtam T, Narang A, Gupta A. Retinopathy of prematurity in Asian Indian babies weighing greater than 1250 grams at birth: Ten years’ data from a tertiary care center in a developing country. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:331–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jalali S, Matalia J, Hussain A, Anand R. Modification of screening criteria for retinopathy of prematurity in India and other middle-income countries. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:966–968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen Y, Li X. Characteristics of severe retinopathy of prematurity patients in China: a repeat of the first epidemic? Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:268–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trinavarat A, Atchaneeyasakul L, Udompunturak S. Applicability of American and British Criteria for Screening of the Retinopathy of Prematurity in Thailand. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004;48:50–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The STOP-ROP Multicenter Study Group. Supplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold Retinopathy of Prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized controlled trial: Primary Outcomes. Pediatrics 2000;105: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright KW, Sami D, Thompson L, Ramanathan R, Joseph R, Farzavandi S. A physiologic reduced oxygen protocol decreases the incidence of threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2006;104:78–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chow LC, Wright KW, Sola A. Can Changes in Clinical Practice Decrease the Incidence of Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants? Pediatrics 2003;111:339–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jalali S, Anand R, Kumar H, Dogra MR, Azad R, Gopal L. Programme planning and screening strategies in retinopathy of prematurity. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51:89–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parag K. Shah
    • 1
    • 3
  • V. Narendran
    • 1
  • N. Kalpana
    • 1
  • Clare Gilbert
    • 2
  1. 1.Pediatric Retina ServicesAravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of OphthalmologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric RetinaAravind Eye HospitalCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations