Advertisement

Results of a nationwide survey on multidisciplinary teams on thyroid cancer in Spain

  • J. J. DíezEmail author
  • J. C. Galofré
  • A. Oleaga
  • E. Grande
  • M. Mitjavila
  • P. Moreno
Research Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

There is an important lack of knowledge as to the functioning of multidisciplinary teams on thyroid cancer in current clinical practice. We aimed to retrieve data on the composition, structure, and procedures developed by the multidisciplinary units of thyroid cancer in Spain.

Methods

A nationwide survey consisting of questions about composition, structure, and functioning of multidisciplinary teams was designed. It was available online from November 15, 2017 to February 15, 2018.

Results

Seventy-two multidisciplinary units responded to our survey. Of these, 15 (20.8%) focused only in thyroid cancer, while 57 (79.2%) included other endocrine disorders or non-endocrine tumors. The median (interquartile range) of members of the teams was 11 (9–14). The most frequent medical specialties in the units were endocrinology (100%), surgery (94.4%), pathology (80.6%), radiology (75.0%), nuclear medicine (73.6%), and medical oncology (55.6%). The annual number of patients reviewed by the teams was 40 (20–74). 56.9% of the multidisciplinary teams have elaborated clinical protocols for local use. Apart from clinical case discussions in the meetings, 45.8% of the units included educational activities and 36.1% research subjects. Quality indicators were developed by 22% of the teams.

Conclusions

These results suggest that there are some hopeful signs that international recommendations of having multidisciplinary approach to patients with thyroid cancer are being followed in Spain. This gives us the opportunity to proceed with further studies to analyze the real impact of this high standard of care on patient outcomes.

Keywords

Multidisciplinary team Multidisciplinary approach Thyroid cancer Cancer care Case review meeting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición (SEEN) and Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (SEMNIM) for allowing us to host our survey on their respective websites. We thank Sanofi Genzyme for the help in disseminating the survey throughout Spanish hospitals involved in the treatment of thyroid cancer patients.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that could have direct or potential influence or impart bias on this work.

Ethical approval

This article does not involve the delivery of interventions on human participants or animals. This study has used only information from the specialists who kindly responded to the survey designed by the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not necessary, since no patient data was used in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Díez JJ, Grande E, Alonso T, Iglesias P. Abordaje multidisciplinar en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de pacientes con tumores endocrinos. Med Clín (Barc). 2015;145:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lamb BW, Taylor C, Lamb JN, Strickland SL, Vicent C, Green JSA, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: What is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamagno G, Sheahan K, Skehan SJ, Geoghegan JG, Fennelly D, Collins CD, et al. Initial impact of a systematic multidisciplinary approach on the management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Endocrine. 2013;44:504–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pawlik TM, Laheru D, Hruban RH, Coleman J, Wolfgang CL, Campbell K, et al. Evaluating the impact of a single-day multidisciplinary clinic on the management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2081–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horvath LE, Yordan E, Malhotra D, Leyva I, Bortel K, Schalk D, et al. Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:e21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bible KC, Smallridge RC, Morris JC, Molina JR, Suman VJ, Copland JA, et al. Development of a multidisciplinary, multicampus subspecialty practice in endocrine cancers. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8:e1s–5s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Partnership Action Against Cancer consensus group, Borras JM, Albreht T, Audisio R, Briers E, Casali P, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:475–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Díez JJ, Galofré JC, Oleaga A, Grande E, Mitjavila M, Moreno P, et al. Declaración de consenso para la acreditación de unidades multidisciplinares en cáncer de tiroides. Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63:e1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10:486–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Cifras oficiales de población resultantes de la revisión del Padrón municipal a 1 de enero. Población por comunidades y ciudades autónomas y tamaño de los municipios. Available at: https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=2915&L=0. Visited on 16 Jan 2019.
  12. 12.
    Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social. Portal Estadístico. Area de Inteligencia de Gestión. Base de Datos de Clínicos de Atención Primaria (BDCAP). Problemas de Salud. Available at: http://pestadistico.inteligenciadegestion.msssi.es/publicoSNS/comun/Cubo.aspx?IdNodo=22126. Visited on 16 Jan 2019.
  13. 13.
    Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a ystematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1002–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, Evans C, Evans RM, Gerrard BG, et al. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;81(Suppl 1):1–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Díez JJ, Oleaga A, Álvarez-Escolá C, Martín T, Galofré JC. Grupo de Trabajo de Cáncer de Tiroides de la Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Guía clínica para el manejo de pacientes con carcinoma diferenciado de tiroides de bajo riesgo. Endocrinol Nutr. 2015;62:e57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarkar S, Arora S, Lamb B, Green J, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. Case review in urology multidisciplinary team meetings: what members think of its functioning. J Clin Urol. 2014;7:394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamb B, Jalil R, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Green J. Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sundi D, Cohen JE, Cole AP, Neuman BP, Cooper J, Faisal FA, et al. Establishment of a new prostate cancer multidisciplinary clinic: format and initial experience. Prostate. 2015;75:191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly SL, Jackson JE, Hickey BE, Szallasi FG, Bond CA. Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Korman H, Lanni T, Shah C, Parslow J, Tull J, Ghilezan M, et al. Impact of a prostate multidisciplinary clinic program on patient treatment decisions and on adherence to NCCN guidelines: the William Beaumont Hospital experience. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;20:778–84.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keating NL, Landrum MB, Lamont EB, Bozeman SR, Shulman LN, McNeil BJ. Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lamb BW, Green JS, Benn J, Brown KF, Vincent CA, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henry M, Frenkiel S, Chartier G, MacDonald C, Payne RJ, Black JM, et al. Thyroid cancer patients receiving an interdisciplinary team-based approach (ITCA-ThyCa) appear to display better outcomes: program evaluation results indicating a need for further integrated care and support. Psychooncology. 2018;27:937–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCarthy M, Datta P, Khachatryan A, Coleman MP, Rachet B. Would compliance with cancer care standards improve survival for breast, colorectal and lung cancers? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:650–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El Saghir NS, Keating NL, Carlson RW, Khoury KE, Fallowfield L. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e461.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tree AC, Harding V, Bhangu A, Krishnasamy V, Morton D, Stebbing J, et al. The need for multidisciplinarity in specialist training to optimize future patient care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:508–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patients assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Informe 2017. Registro RECALSEEN. La atención al paciente en las unidades de Endocrinología y Nutrición en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Available at: http://www.seen.es/actualidad/Noticias.aspx?tbBuscar=d7tNqSpfK1w9ErpVIhDH3gYRYzE9%2B2OKS379J1sxTUzVioEQVRLMBiiFK8KR5rtz. Visited on 16 Jan 2019.
  31. 31.
    Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB. Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol. 2013;68:780–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologyHospital Universitario Ramón y CajalMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro MajadahondaMajadahonda, MadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of EndocrinologyClínica Universidad de NavarraPamplonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of EndocrinologyHospital Universitario BasurtoBilbaoSpain
  5. 5.Department of Medical OncologyMD Anderson Cancer CenterMadridSpain
  6. 6.Department of Nuclear MedicineHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro MajadahondaMadridSpain
  7. 7.Department of General SurgeryHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations