Clinical and Translational Oncology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 219–226 | Cite as

Long-term survival in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based therapy

  • J. De Castro
  • J. L. González-Larriba
  • S. Vázquez
  • B. Massutí
  • J. M. Sanchez-Torres
  • M. Dómine
  • P. Garrido
  • A. Calles
  • A. Artal
  • R. Collado
  • R. García
  • M. Sereno
  • M. Majem
  • J. A. Macías
  • O. Juan
  • J. Gómez-Codina
  • B. Hernández
  • M. Lázaro
  • A. L. Ortega
  • M. Cobo
  • J. M. Trigo
  • E. Carcereny
  • C. Rolfo
  • S. Macia
  • J. Muñoz
  • P. Diz
  • M. Méndez
  • F. Rosillo
  • L. Paz-Ares
  • J. V. Cardona
  • D. Isla
Research Article

Abstract

Background/Aim

First-line bevacizumab-based therapies have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to descriptively analyse patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received a long-term period of maintenance bevacizumab.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 104 patients who had already reached a progression-free survival (PFS) of at least 9 months.

Results

Median overall survival and PFS were 30.7 and 15.1 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 83 %. Weight loss ≤5 %, ECOG PS = 0, or low number of metastatic sites seem to be predictive factors of good evolution. The incidence of bevacizumab-related adverse events appeared to be similar as the previous studies.

Conclusion

Our findings show that there is a long-term survivor group whom the administration of bevacizumab resulted in a relevant prolongation of response without new safety signals. Due to the population heterogeneity, it was not possible to identify the standardised predictive factors.

Keywords

Non-squamous NSCLC First-line treatment Bevacizumab Bevacizumab maintenance therapy Routine clinical practice setting Observational study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Medical writing support was provided by Ana López-Ballesteros and Antonio Torres at Dynamic S.L., during the preparation of this paper. This work was supported by Roche Farma, S.A., Spain.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standards

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, all its amendments, and national regulations. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethic Committee at Hospital Universitario La Paz (Madrid, Spain) and all patients gave their informed consent before study inclusion.

Conflict of interest

Dr. de Castro provided Scientific advice to Roche Farma S.A; Dr. Massuti participated as an Advisor for Roche Farma S.A.; Dr. Rolfo received a research grant from Sanofi Aventis, he was also a Speaker Bureau for Novartis, and received consultancy fees from Mylan Pharmaceuticals and Oncopass; Dr. Paz-Ares provided Scientific advice to Roche Farma S.A.; and JV Cardona was an employee for Roche Farma S.A. None of the other authors has declared any conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Levi F, La VC, Negri E. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2012. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):1044–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):706–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhan P, Wang J, Lv XJ, Wang Q, Qiu LX, Lin XQ, et al. Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4(9):1094–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(5):391–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, Herbst RS, Nemunaitis JJ, Jablons DM, et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2184–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niho S, Kunitoh H, Nokihara H, Horai T, Ichinose Y, Hida T, et al. Randomized phase II study of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012;76(3):362–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reck M, von PJ, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Hirsh V, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1227–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reck M, von PJ, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Hirsh V, et al. Overall survival with cisplatin-gemcitabine and bevacizumab or placebo as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised phase III trial (AVAiL). Ann Oncol. 2010;21(9):1804–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2542–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Liu X, Zhu Y, Lu S, et al. BEYOND: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III study of first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or placebo in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2197–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crino L, Dansin E, Garrido P, Griesinger F, Laskin J, Pavlakis N, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SAiL, MO19390): a phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):733–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lopez-Chavez A, Young T, Fages S, Leon L, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, et al. Bevacizumab maintenance in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, clinical patterns, and outcomes in the eastern cooperative oncology group 4599 study: results of an exploratory analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(11):1707–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nadler E, Yu E, Ravelo A, Sing A, Forsyth M, Gruschkus S. Bevacizumab treatment to progression after chemotherapy: outcomes from a U.S. community practice network. Oncologist. 2011;16(4):486–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soria JC, Mauguen A, Reck M, Sandler AB, Saijo N, Johnson DH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, phase II/III trials adding bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):20–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berman RS, Portera CA Jr, Ellis LM. Biology of liver metastases. Cancer Treat Res. 2001;109:183–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nathoo N, Chahlavi A, Barnett GH, Toms SA. Pathobiology of brain metastases. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(3):237–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Preusser M, Capper D, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Berghoff AS, Birner P, Bartsch R, et al. Brain metastases: pathobiology and emerging targeted therapies. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(2):205–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bar J, Goss GD. Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(3):609–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Folkman J, Ryeom S. Is oncogene addiction angiogenesis-dependent? Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:389–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barlesi F, Scherpereel A, Rittmeyer A, Pazzola A, Ferrer TN, Kim JH, et al. Randomized phase III trial of maintenance bevacizumab with or without pemetrexed after first-line induction with bevacizumab, cisplatin, and pemetrexed in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAPERL (MO22089). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(24):3004–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson BE, Kabbinavar F, Fehrenbacher L, Hainsworth J, Kasubhai S, Kressel B, et al. ATLAS: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIIB trial comparing bevacizumab therapy with or without erlotinib, after completion of chemotherapy, with bevacizumab for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3926–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patel JD, Socinski MA, Garon EB, Reynolds CH, Spigel DR, Olsen MR, et al. PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(34):4349–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dansin E, Cinieri S, Garrido P, Griesinger F, Isla D, Koehler M, et al. MO19390 (SAiL): bleeding events in a phase IV study of first-line bevacizumab with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2012;76(3):373–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kosty MP, Brahmer JR, Jahanzeb M, Kumar P, Robles R, Wozniak AJ, et al. Use of bevacizumab (BV) after induction therapy is associated with survival benefit in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ARIES observational cohort study (OCS). Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(Suppl. 1):598 (abstr. 9020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mok T, Gorbunova V, Juhasz E, Szima B, Burdaeva O, Orlov S, et al. A correlative biomarker analysis of the combination of bevacizumab and carboplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the phase II randomized ABIGAIL study (BO21015). J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(6):848–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Massuti B, Jantus-Lewintre E, Gonzalez Arriba JL, Rodriguez Abreu D, Juan O, Domine M et al (2014) ANGIOMET: analysis of the correlations between angiogenic markers and outcome in patients (p) with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB). J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl; abstr e19014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. De Castro
    • 1
  • J. L. González-Larriba
    • 2
  • S. Vázquez
    • 3
  • B. Massutí
    • 4
  • J. M. Sanchez-Torres
    • 5
  • M. Dómine
    • 6
  • P. Garrido
    • 7
  • A. Calles
    • 8
  • A. Artal
    • 9
  • R. Collado
    • 10
  • R. García
    • 11
  • M. Sereno
    • 12
  • M. Majem
    • 13
  • J. A. Macías
    • 14
  • O. Juan
    • 15
  • J. Gómez-Codina
    • 16
  • B. Hernández
    • 17
  • M. Lázaro
    • 18
  • A. L. Ortega
    • 19
  • M. Cobo
    • 20
  • J. M. Trigo
    • 21
  • E. Carcereny
    • 22
  • C. Rolfo
    • 23
  • S. Macia
    • 24
  • J. Muñoz
    • 25
  • P. Diz
    • 26
  • M. Méndez
    • 27
  • F. Rosillo
    • 28
  • L. Paz-Ares
    • 29
  • J. V. Cardona
    • 30
  • D. Isla
    • 31
  1. 1.Medical Oncology Unit––Department of Translational OncologyHospital Universitario La Paz-IDIPAZMadridSpain
  2. 2.Hospital Clínico Universitario San CarlosMadridSpain
  3. 3.Hospital Universitario Lucus AugustiLugoSpain
  4. 4.Hospital General Universitario de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  5. 5.MD Anderson Cancer Center MadridMadridSpain
  6. 6.Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
  7. 7.Hospital Ramón y CajalMadridSpain
  8. 8.Centro Integral Oncológico Clara CampalMadridSpain
  9. 9.Hospital Universitario Miguel ServetSaragossaSpain
  10. 10.Hospital San Pedro de AlcántaraCáceresSpain
  11. 11.Hospital Universitario Gregorio MarañónMadridSpain
  12. 12.Hospital Infanta SofíaMadridSpain
  13. 13.Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauBarcelonaSpain
  14. 14.Hospital General Universitario Morales MeseguerMurciaSpain
  15. 15.Hospital Arnau VilanovaValenciaSpain
  16. 16.Hospital La FeValenciaSpain
  17. 17.Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra––Hospital de NavarraPamplonaSpain
  18. 18.Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de VigoPontevedraSpain
  19. 19.Complejo Hospitalario de JaénJaénSpain
  20. 20.Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos HayaMálagaSpain
  21. 21.Hospital Universitario Virgen de la VictoriaMálagaSpain
  22. 22.Institut Català d’Oncologia-Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBarcelonaSpain
  23. 23.University Hospital of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  24. 24.Hospital General Universitario de EldaAlicanteSpain
  25. 25.Hospital Universitario Doctor PesetValenciaSpain
  26. 26.Complejo Asistencial Universitario de LeónLeónSpain
  27. 27.Hospital Universitario de MóstolesMadridSpain
  28. 28.Complejo Hospitalario TorrecárdenasAlmeríaSpain
  29. 29.Hospital Universitario Virgen del RocíoSevilleSpain
  30. 30.Roche Farma, S.A.MadridSpain
  31. 31.Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano BlesaSaragossaSpain

Personalised recommendations