Clinical and Translational Oncology

, Volume 8, Issue 7, pp 491–499 | Cite as

Preliminary analysis of the resources in brachytherapy in Europe and its variability of use

  • Ferran Guedea
  • Tracey Ellison
  • Germaine Heeren
  • Montserrat Ventura
  • Guy François
  • Jean Jacques Mazeron
  • Brain Cottier
  • J. López Torrecilla
  • Pedro Bilbao
  • Michel Taillet
  • Josep María Borras
Research Articles

Abstract

Purpose

The main objective of the program «Patterns of Care for Brachytherapy in Europe (PCBE)» is to establish a group with detailed information on brachytherapy throughout Europe.

Methods

The data was compiled by the general coordinator, the ESTRO, and the «National Cancer Services Analysis» through a website.

Results

A total of 32 countries reported data from at least 50% of their centres (criteria of inclusion). Countries were grouped in three categories based on the time of incorporation to the European Union. The majority of treatments belonged to gynaecological tumours. A large spread was found regarding workload of specialists depending on centre and group.

Conclusion

Collection of information by a website is a feasible methodology. An increase in brachytherapy treatment was observed in all 3 groups by a rate of more than 20% (year 2002 versus year 1997). These results advocate for the continuation of the PCBE study to demonstrate the development in the field, such as an increase or decrease of patient numbers per tumour category.

Key words

brachytherapy Europe patterns of care equipment and supplies infrastructure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Slotman BJ, Leer JWH. Infrastructure of radiotherapy in the Netherlands: evaluation of prognoses and introduction of a new model for determining the needs. Radioth Oncol. 2003;66:345–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tatsuzaki H, Levin CV. Quantitative status of resources for radiation therapy in Asia and Pacific Region. Radiother Oncol. 2002;63:147–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zubizarreta EH, Poitevin A, Levin CV. Overview of radiotherapy resources in Latin America: a survey by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiother Oncol. 2004;73:97–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Esco R, Palacios A, Pardo J, et al. Infrastructure of radiotherapy in Spain: a minimal standard of radiotherapy resources. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:319–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    López Torrecilla J, Bataller E. Situación de la braquiterapie en España. Análisis de complejidad y tiempos de preparación y tratamiento. Rev Oncologia. 2001;3:91–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zelefsky MJ, Moughan J, Owen J, et al. Changing trends in National Practice for external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: 1999 Patterns of Care Survey for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:1053–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernier J, Horiot JC, Bartelink H. Profile of radiotherapy departments contributing to the Cooperative Group of Radiotherapy of EORTC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;54:953–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FESEO 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ferran Guedea
    • 1
  • Tracey Ellison
    • 2
  • Germaine Heeren
    • 3
  • Montserrat Ventura
    • 1
  • Guy François
    • 3
  • Jean Jacques Mazeron
    • 4
  • Brain Cottier
    • 2
  • J. López Torrecilla
    • 5
  • Pedro Bilbao
    • 6
  • Michel Taillet
    • 3
  • Josep María Borras
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d’OncologiaIDIBELL. L’Hospitalet del LlobregatL’Hospitalet, BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.The National Cancer Services AnalysisNHSUK
  3. 3.ESTROBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Hôpital Pitié-SalpétrièreParisFrance
  5. 5.Hospital General de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  6. 6.Universidad del País Vasco (Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea)Pais VascoSpain

Personalised recommendations