Indian Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 112–115 | Cite as

Evaluation of Probiotic Characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Two Commercial Preparations Available in Indian Market

  • Neelja Singhal
  • Nambaram Somendro Singh
  • Shilpa Mohanty
  • Pooja Singh
  • Jugsharan Singh VirdiEmail author
Short Communications


The enormous health benefits associated with probiotics has resulted in an increased consumption of probiotic supplements. Several factors like regular sub-culturing, storage, unfavourable conditions etc. might compromise the efficacy and/or safety of lactic acid bacteria which are the major components of many probiotic preparations available in the market. The present study evaluated the probiotic characteristics and safety of probiotic bacteria isolated from two preparations available commercially in India. The products did not specify the genera, species or strains of the bacteria used. These were cultured using standard microbiological methods for cultivation of lactic acid bacteria. Bacteria were identified by PCR amplification and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene. Microbiological and molecular analyses revealed that both preparations contained homogenous population of Enterococcus faecium and Pediococcus acidilactici respectively. Assessment for several essential and desirable probiotic properties revealed that both the probiotic strains were safe and resistant to salt, lysozyme, bile salt and common antibiotics. The probiotic preparation containing P. acidilactici was better than that containing E. faecium as it survived in low pH and showed bile salt hydrolase activity. The probiotic preparation containing P. acidilactici also exhibited cholesterol-lowering activity.


Cholesterol-lowering Commercial products Enterococcus faecium Pediococcus acidilactici Probiotics 



We thank Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahto for technical help. NS is supported by Start up Research Grant for Young Scientists (SB/YS/LS-156/2014), Science and Engineering Research Board of Department of Science and Technology. NSS is supported by ICMR-SRF.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NS, NSS, JSV. Performed the experiments: NS, SM, PS, NSS. Wrote the paper: NS, JSV.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no competing interest exists.

Supplementary material

12088_2018_762_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
12088_2018_762_MOESM2_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)
12088_2018_762_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 15 kb)
12088_2018_762_MOESM4_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 13 kb)


  1. 1.
    Kurzak P, Ehrman MA, Bauer J, Vogel RF (2002) Characterization of Lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J Appl Microbiol 92:966–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fasoli S, Marzotto M, Rizzotti L, Rossi F, Dellaglio F, Torriani S (2003) Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 82:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elliot E, Teversham K (2004) An evaluation of nine probiotics available in South Africa, August 2003. S Afr Med J 94:121–124Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Theunissen J, Britz TJ, Torriani S, Witthuhn RC (2005) Identification of probiotic microorganisms in South African products using PCR-based DGGE analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 98:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zago M, Fornasari ME, Carminati D, Burns P, Suàrez V, Vinderola G, Reinheimer J, Giraffa G (2011) Characterization and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from cheeses. Food Microbiol 28:1033–1040. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee J, Yun HS, Cho KW, Oh S, Kim SH, Chun T, Kim B, Whang KY (2011) Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated Lactobacillus spp.: immune modulation and longevity. Int J Food Microbiol 148:80–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kos B, Susković J, Vuković S, Simpraga M, Frece J, Matosić S (2003) Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J Appl Microbiol 94:981–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golowczyc MA, Mobili P, Garrote GL, Abraham AG, De Antoni GL (2007) Protective action of Lactobacillus kefir carrying S-layer protein against Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Int J Food Microbiol 118:264–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2010) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 20th informational supplement (M100–S20) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ridwan BU, Koning CJ, Besselink MG, Timmerman HM, Brouwer EC, Verhoef J, Gooszen HG, Akkermans LM (2008) Antimicrobial activity of a multispecies probiotic (Ecologic 641) against pathogens isolated from infected pancreatic necrosis. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:61–67. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rudel LL, Morris MD (1973) Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. J Lipid Res 14:364–366Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pieniza S, Andreazzab R, Anghinonic T, Camargoc F, Brandelli A (2014) Probiotic potential, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Enterococcus durans strain LAB18s. Food Control 37:251–256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta H, Malik RK (2007) Incidence of virulence in bacteriocin-producing enterococcal isolates. Le Lait 87:587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pisano M, Casula M, Corda A, Fadda M, Deplano M, Cosentino S (2008) In vitro probiotic characteristics of lactobacillus strains isolated from fiore sardo cheese. Ital J Food Sci 20:505–516Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Microbiologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neelja Singhal
    • 1
  • Nambaram Somendro Singh
    • 1
  • Shilpa Mohanty
    • 1
  • Pooja Singh
    • 1
  • Jugsharan Singh Virdi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Delhi South CampusNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations