Advertisement

Indian Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 122–130 | Cite as

Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Substrates for Enhanced Delignification and Enzymatic Digestibility

  • M. Saritha
  • Anju Arora
  • LataEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Sheer enormity of lignocellulosics makes them potential feedstock for biofuel production but, their conversion into fermentable sugars is a major hurdle. They have to be pretreated physically, chemically, or biologically to be used by fermenting organisms for production of ethanol. Each lignocellulosic substrate is a complex mix of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, bound in a matrix. While cellulose and hemicellulose yield fermentable sugars, lignin is the most recalcitrant polymer, consisting of phenyl-propanoid units. Many microorganisms in nature are able to attack and degrade lignin, thus making access to cellulose easy. Such organisms are abundantly found in forest leaf litter/composts and especially include the wood rotting fungi, actinomycetes and bacteria. These microorganisms possess enzyme systems to attack, depolymerize and degrade the polymers in lignocellulosic substrates. Current pretreatment research is targeted towards developing processes which are mild, economical and environment friendly facilitating subsequent saccharification of cellulose and its fermentation to ethanol. Besides being the critical step, pretreatment is also cost intensive. Biological treatments with white rot fungi and Streptomyces have been studied for delignification of pulp, increasing digestibility of lignocellulosics for animal feed and for bioremediation of paper mill effluents. Such lignocellulolytic organisms can prove extremely useful in production of bioethanol when used for removal of lignin from lignocellulosic substrate and also for cellulase production. Our studies on treatment of hardwood and softwood residues with Streptomyces griseus isolated from leaf litter showed that it enhanced the mild alkaline solubilisation of lignins and also produced high levels of the cellulase complex when growing on wood substrates. Lignin loss (Klason lignin) observed was 10.5 and 23.5% in case of soft wood and hard wood, respectively. Thus, biological pretreatment process for lignocellulosic substrate using lignolytic organisms such as actinomycetes and white rot fungi can be developed for facilitating efficient enzymatic digestibility of cellulose.

Keywords

Bioethanol Biological pre-treatment Delignification Lignocellulose 

References

  1. 1.
    Larson ED (2008) Biofuel production technologies: status, prospects and implications for trade and development. Paper presented at the United Nations conference on trade and development (UNCTAD) 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sánchez OJ, Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99:5270–5295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sukumaran RK, Surender VJ, Sindhu R, Binod P, Janu KU, Sajna KV, Rajasree KP, Pandey A (2010) Lignocellulosic ethanol in India: prospects, challenges and feedstock availability. Bioresour Technol 101:4826–4833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holtzapple MT (1993) Cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. In: Macrae R, Robinson RK, Sadler MJ (eds) Encyclopedia of food science, food technology, and nutrition. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley C, Wood P, Kearns R, Black B (1989) Biological delignification of wood and straw for ethanol production via solid state culture. Final Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Montana, 1989Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alvira P, Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN (1999) Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15:804–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esteghlalian AR, Srivastava V, Gilkes N, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2001) An overview of factors influencing the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. In: Himmel ME, Baker W, Saddler JN (eds) Glycosyl hydrolases for biomass conversion. ACS, Washington, DC, pp 100–111Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang VS, Holtzapple M (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:5–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taherzadeh JM, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN (2007) Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:67–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tassinari T, Macy C, Spano L, Ryu DDY (1980) Energy requirements and process design considerations in compression-milling pretreatment of cellulosic wastes for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:1689–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K and Julson JL (2008) Influence of high shear bioreactor parameters on carbohydrate release from different biomasses. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2008. ASABE 084114. ASABE, St. JosephGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Playne MJ (1984) Increased digestibility of bagasse by pretreatment with alkalis and steam explosion. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:426–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar R, Wyman CE (2009) Effects of cellulase and xylanase enzymes on the deconstruction of solids from pretreatment of poplar by leading technologies. Biotechnol Prog 25:302–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knappert H, Grethlein H, Converse A (1981) Partial acid hydrolysis of poplar wood as a pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioengineering Symp 11:67–77Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wyman CE (1996) Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. Taylor Francis, Washington, p 417Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wood TM, Saddler JN (1988) Increasing the availability of cellulose in biomass materials. Methods Enzymol 160:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao H, Cheng K, Liu D (2009) Organosolv pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:815–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Delong EA (1981) Methods for rendering lignin separable from cellulose and hemicelluloses and the product so formed. Canadian Patent 1096374Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan X, Xie D, Gilkes N, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2005) Strategies to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwood with high residual lignin content. Appl Biochem Biotechnol A 124:1069–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliva JM, Sáez F, Ballesteros I, Gónzalez A, Negro MJ, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M (2003) Effects of lignocellulosic degradation compounds from steam explosion pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:141–154Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun RC, Tomkinson RC (2002) Characterization of hemicelluloses obtained by classical and ultrasonically assisted extractions from wheat straw. Carbohydr Polym 50:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng Y, Lin HM, Tsao GT (1998) Pretreatment for cellulose hydrolysis by carbon dioxide explosion. Biotechnol Prog 14:890–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bobleter O, Cocin R (1979) Degradation of poplar lignin by hydrothermal treatment. Cellul Chem Technol 13:583–593Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dale BE (1986) Method for increasing the reactivity and digestibility of cellulose with ammonia. US patent no. 4600590Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holtzapple MT, Jun J-H, Ashok G, Patibandla SL, Dale BE (1991) The ammonia freeze explosion process: a practical lignocellulose pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28–29:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY (2005) Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96:1959–1966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirk TM, Farrell R (1987) Enzymatic “combustion”: the microbial degradation of lignin. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:465–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Howard RL, Abotsi E, Jansen van Rensberg EL, Howard S (2003) Lignocellulose biotechnology: issues of bioconversion and enzyme production. Afr J Biotechnol 2:602–619Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI (2003) Opportunities to improve fibre degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 797:1–31Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malherbe S, Cloete TE (2003) Lignocellulosic biodegradation: fundamentals and applications: a review. Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eriksson K-EL (2000) Lignocellulose, lignin, ligninases. In: Schaechter M (ed) Encyclopedia of microbiology, vol 3. Academic press, San Diego, pp 39–48Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kunamneni A, Ballesteros A, Plou FJ, Alcalde M (2007) Fungal laccase—a versatile enzyme for biotechnological applications. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Communicating current research and educational topics and trends in applied microbiology. Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, pp 223–245Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mandels M, Sternberg D (1976) Recent advances in cellulase technology. Fermentation technology 54:267–286Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crawford DL, Barder MJ, Pometto AL III, Crawford RL (1982) Chemistry of softwood lignin degradation by Streptomyces viridosporus. Arch Microbiol 131:140–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glenn KJ, Gold HM (1983) Decolorization of several polymeric dyes by the lignin-degrading basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1741–1747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kirk TK, Tien M, Johnsrud SC, Eriksson KE (1986) Lignin degrading activity of Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds: comparison of cellulase-negative and other strains. Enzym Microbial Technol 8:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scott GM, Aktar M, Lentz MJ (1998) New technology for paper making: commercalising biopulping. Tappi J 81:220–225Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Songulashvili G, Elisashvili V, Penninckx M, Metreveli E, Hadar Y, Aladashvili N, Asatiani M (2005) Bioconversion of plant raw materials in value-added products by Lentinus edodes (Berk.) Singer and Pleurotus spp. Int J Med Mushrooms 7(3):467–468Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ragunathan R, Swaminathan K (2004) Bioconversion of agro-wastes by fungus, Pleurotus spp. Biol Mem 30:1–6Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taseli BK (2008) Fungal treatment of hemp-based pulp and paper mill wastes. Afr J Biotechnol 7:286–289Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kuhar S, Nair LM, Kuhad RC (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic material with fungi capable of higher lignin degradation and lower carbohydrate degradation improves substrate acid hydrolysis and eventual conversion to ethanol. Can J Microbiol 54:305–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Singh P, Suman A, Tiwari P, Arya N, Gaur A, Shrivastava AK (2008) Biological pretreatment of sugarcane trash for its conversion to fermentable sugars. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:667–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jian S, Ratna R, Sharma-Shivappa, Chinn M, Howell N (2008) Effect of microbial pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cotton stalks for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 33:88–96Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xu C, Ma F, Zhang X (2009) Lignocellulose degradation and enzyme production by Irpex lacteus CD2 during solid-state fermentation of corn stover. J Biosci Bioeng 108:372–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reid ID (1985) Biological delignification of aspen wood by solid-state fermentation with the white-rot fungus, Merulius tremellosus. Appl Env Microbiol 50:133–139Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Regalado V, Rodriguez A, Perestelo F, Carnicero A, Fuente G, Falcon MA (1997) Lignin degradation and modification by the soil inhabiting fungus Fusarium proliferatum. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3716–3718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang X, Yu H, Huang H, Liu Y (2007) Evaluation of biological pretreatment with white rot fungi for the enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 60:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhang X, Xu C, Wang H (2007) Pretreatment of bamboo residues with Coriolus versicolor for enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biosci Bioeng 104:149–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hamisan AF, Abd-Aziz S, Kamaruddin K, Md. Shah UK, Shahab N, Hassan MA (2009) Delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch using chemical and microbial pretreatment methods. Int J Agric Res 4:250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yu H, Du W, Zhang J, Ma F, Zhang X, Zhong W (2010) Fungal treatment of cornstalks enhances the delignification and xylan loss during mild alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility of glucan. Bioresour Technol 101:6728–6734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wan C, Li Y (2010) Microbial pretreatment of corn stover with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 101:6398–6403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wan C, Li Y (2010) Microbial delignification of corn stover by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora for improving cellulose digestibility. Enzyme Microbial Technol 47:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Arora A, Nain L, Gupta JK (2005) Solid-state fermentation of wood residues by Streptomyces griseus B1, a soil isolate, and solubilisation of lignins. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bon EPS and Ferrara MA (2007) Bioethanol production via enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. In: The Role of Agricultural Biotechnologies for Production of Bioenergy in Developing Countries. FAO. Available via http://www.fao.org/biotech/seminaroct2007.htm. Cited 12 October 2007
  58. 58.
    Eggeman T, Elander RT (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96:2019–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Reid ID (1989) Solid-state fermentations for biological delignification. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:786–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Microbiologists of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of MicrobiologyIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations