Advertisement

Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1753–1760 | Cite as

Distributed consensus of networked markov jump multi-agent systems with mode-dependent event-triggered communications and switching topologies

  • Chao MaEmail author
  • Erlong Kang
Article
  • 136 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Issue on Networked Cyber-Physical Systems

Abstract

This paper investigates the distributed leaderless consensus problem of networked Markov jump multi-agent systems with mode-dependent switching topologies. Specifically, a novel mode-dependent sampling and event-triggered communication strategy is proposed to reduce the network burden with less conservatism. Based on model transformation and constructing the mode-dependent Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, sufficient consensus criteria are first established. Then, the desired event triggering function parameters and the controller gains are designed in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). In the end, an illustrative example is provided to verify the effectiveness of our proposed consensus method.

Keywords

Distributed consensus Markov jump multi-agent systems Mode-dependent event-triggered communication Mode-dependent switching topologies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61703038 and 61627808.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ren W, Beard RW (2005) Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(5):655–661MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tian YP, Liu CL (2008) Consensus of multi-agent systems with diverse input and communication delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(9):2122–2128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong Y, Hu J, Gao L (2006) Tracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology. Automatica 42(7):1177–1182MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu W, Zheng WX, Chen G, Ren W, Cao J (2011) Second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems with sampled position data. Automatica 47(7):1496–1503MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed NR, Cortes J, Martinez S (2016) Distributed control and estimation of robotic vehicle networks: An overview of part 2. IEEE Control Syst Mag 36(4):18–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yin X, Liu J (2017) Distributed moving horizon state estimation of two-time-scale nonlinear systems. Automatica 79:152–161MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nedic A, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2010) Constrained consensus and optimization in multi-agent networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 55(4):922–938MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin P, Jia Y (2009) Consensus of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with nonuniform time-delays and dynamically changing topologies. Automatica 45(9):2154–2158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiao F, Wang L (2008) Asynchronous consensus in continuous-time multi-agent systems with switching topology and time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(8):1804–1816MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim H, Shim H, Seo JH (2011) Output consensus of heterogeneous uncertain linear multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(1):200–206MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma C, Shi P, Zhao X, Zeng Q (2015) Consensus of Euler-Lagrange systems networked by sampled-data information with probabilistic time delays. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 45(6):1126–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olfati-Saber R, Murray RM (2004) Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(9):1520–1533MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ni W, Cheng D (2010) Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies. Syst Control Lett 59(3-4):209–217MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun YG, Wang L, Xie G (2008) Average consensus in networks of dynamic agents with switching topologies and multiple time-varying delays. Syst Control Lett 57(2):175–183MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen G, Duan Z, Chen G, Yu W (2014) Consensus tracking of multi-agent systems with Lipschitz-type node dynamics and switching topologies. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Regul Pap 61(2):499–511MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yin X, Li Z, Zhang L, Han M (2018) Distributed state estimation of sensor-network systems subject to Markovian channel switching with application to a chemical process. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 48 (6):864–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu Y, Zhong Z, Basin MV, Zhou D (2018) A descriptor system approach to stability and stabilization of discrete-time switched PWA systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 63(10):3456– 3463MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu Y, Zhong Z, Zheng WX, Zhou D (2018) HMM-based H filtering for discrete-time Markov jump LPV systems over unreliable communication channels. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 48(12):2035–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang L, Zhu Y, Zheng WX (2017) State estimation of discrete-time switched neural networks with multiple communication channels. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 47(4):1028–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu Y, Zhang L, Zheng WX (2016) Distributed H filtering for a class of discrete-time Markov jump lur’e systems with redundant channels. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(3):1876–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang BC, Zhang JF (2013) Distributed output feedback control of Markov jump multi-agent systems. Automatica 49(5):1397– 1402MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakthivel R, Sakthivel R, Kaviarasan B, Alzahrani F (2018) Leader-following exponential consensus of input saturated stochastic multi-agent systems with Markov jump parameters. Neurocomputing 287:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang W, Branicky MS, Phillips SM (2001) Stability of networked control systems. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21(1):84–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang L, Gao H, Kaynak O (2013) Network-induced constraints in networked control systems–A survey. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 9(1):403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fawzi H, Tabuada P, Diggavi S (2014) Secure estimation and control for cyber-physical systems under adversarial attacks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 59(6):1454–1467MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wan J, Yan H, Suo H, Li F (2011) Advances in cyber-physical systems research. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems 5(11):1891–1907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dimarogonas DV, Frazzoli E, Johansson KH (2012) Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 57(5):1291–1297MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mazo M, Tabuada P (2011) Decentralized event-triggered control over wireless sensor/actuator networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(10):2456–2461MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guo G, Ding L, Han QL (2014) A distributed event-triggered transmission strategy for sampled-data consensus of multi-agent systems. Automatica 50(5):1489–1496MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang XM, Han QL (2014) Event-triggered dynamic output feedback control for networked control systems. IET Control Theory Appl 8(4):226–234MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dai J, Guo G (2018) Event-triggered leader-following consensus for multi-agent systems with semi-Markov switching topologies. Inform Sci 459:290–301MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pei Y, Sun J (2015) Consensus of discrete-time linear multi-agent systems with Markov switching topologies and time-delay. Neurocomputing 151:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang Y, Cheng L, Ren W, Hou ZG, Tan M (2015) Seeking consensus in networks of linear agents: communication noises and Markovian switching topologies. IEEE Trans Autom Control 60(5):1374–1379MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gu K, Niculescu SI (2003) Survey on recent results in the stability and control of time-delay systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 125(2):158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Automation and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of AutomationChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations