Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 679–696 | Cite as

A resource allocation model based on double-sided combinational auctions for transparent computing

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Issue on Transparent Computing

Abstract

Transparent Computing (TC) is becoming a promising paradigm in network computing era. Although many researchers believe that TC model has a high requirement for the communication bandwidth, there is no research on the communication bandwidth boundary or resource allocation, which impedes the development of TC. This paper focuses on studying an efficient transparent computing resource allocation model in an economic view. First, under the quality of experiments (QoE) ensured, the utility function of clients and transparent computing providers (TCPs) is constructed. After that, the demand boundary of communication bandwidth is analyzed under the ideal transparent computing model. Based on the above analyses, a resource allocation scheme based on double-sided combinational auctions (DCA) is proposed so that the resource can be shared by both the service side and the client side with the welfare of the whole society being maximized. Afterward, the results scheduled in different experimental scenarios are given, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Overall, this work provides an effective resource allocation model for optimizing the performance of TC.

Keywords

Transparent computing Communication bandwidth boundary Double-sided auctions Resources optimization 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572528, 61379110, 61073104, 61272494, 61572526), The National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program)(2014CB046305).

References

  1. 1.
    Kim SH, Kang DK, Kim WJ, Chen M., & Youn CH (2016) A science gateway cloud with cost adaptive VM management scheme for computational scientific applications. IEEE Syst J doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2501750
  2. 2.
    Liu J, Zhou Y, Zhang D (2016) TranSim: a simulation framework for cache-enabled transparent computing systems. IEEE Trans Comput 65(10):3171–3183MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo K, Xiao Y, Duan G (2016) A cost-efficient architecture for the campus information system based on transparent computing platform. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquit Comput 21(2):95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Chen M, Dai W, Qiu M (2015) Energy optimization with dynamic task scheduling mobile cloud computing. IEEE Syst J. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2442994 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Y, Zhou Y (2013) Transparent computing: spatio-temporal extension on von neumann architecture for cloud services. Tsinghua Sci Technol 18(1):10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xue C, Lin C (2016) Performance modelling for transparent computing using stochastic petri nets. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquit Comput 21(2):81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li H, Yang Y, Luan TH, Liang X, Zhou L, Shen XS (2016) Enabling fine-grained multi-keyword search supporting classified sub-dictionaries over encrypted cloud data. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 13(3):312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su Z, Xu Q, Fei M, Dong M (2016) Game theoretic resource allocation in media cloud with mobile social users. IEEE Trans Multimed 18(8):1650–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu A, Jin X, Cui G, Chen Z (2013) Deployment guidelines for achieving maximal Lifetime and avoiding energy holes in sensor network. Inf Sci 230:197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su Z, Xu Q, Qi Q (2016) Big data in mobile social networks: a QoE-oriented framework. IEEE Netw 30(1):52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeng J, Yang LT, Ma J (2016) A system-level modeling and design for cyber-physical-social systems. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst (TECS) 15(2):35Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Y, He S, Chen J et al (2013) Distributed sampling rate control for rechargeable sensor nodes with limited battery capacity. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(6):3096–3106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ren J, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Liu A, Chen J, Shen XS (2016) Lifetime and energy hole evolution analysis in data-gathering wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 12(2):788–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Z, Liu A, Li Z, Choi YJ, Li J (2017) Distributed duty cycle control for delay improvement in wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 10(3):559–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deng X, He L, Li X, Liu Q, Cai L, Chen Z (2016) A reliable QoS aware routing scheme for neighbor area nework in smart grid. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 9(4):616–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mianxiong D, Kimata T, Sugiura K et al (2014) Quality-of-experience (QoE) in emerging mobile social networks. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 97(10):2606–2612Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Platania M, Obenshain D, Tantillo T, Amir Y, Suri N (2016) On choosing server-or client-side solutions for BFT. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 48(4):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li H, Liu D, Dai Y, Luan TH (2015) Engineering searchable encryption of mobile cloud networks: when qoe meets qop. IEEE Wirel Commun 22(4):74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aazam M, Huh EN (2015) Fog computing micro datacenter based dynamic resource estimation and pricing model for IoT[C] //. IEEE 29th Int Conf Adv Inf Netw Appl:687–694Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yaoxue Zhang, Ju Ren, Jiagang Liu, et al (2017) A Survey on Emerging Computing Paradigms for Big Data. Chinese Journal of Electronics 26(1):1–12Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ren J, Zhang Y, Zhang K, et al (2015) Exploiting mobile crowdsourcing for pervasive cloud services: challenges and solutions[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine 53(3):98–105.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi CR, Jeong HY, Park JH, Jang HJ, Jeong YS (2016) Relative weight comparison between virtual key factors of cloud computing with analytic network process. J Supercomput 72(5):1694–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deng X, Peng Q, He L, He T (2016) Interference-aware QoS routing for neighborhood area network in smart grid. IET Commun. doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2016.0860 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao S, Liu A (2017) High performance target tracking scheme with low prediction precision requirement in WSNs, International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijahuc
  25. 25.
    Hoang DT, Niyato D, Wang P (2012) Optimal admission control policy for mobile cloud computing hotspot with cloudlet ∥WCNC 2012. IEEE Press, Atlanta, pp 3145–3149Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu X, Dong M, Ota K, Hung P, Liu A (2016) Service pricing decision in cyber-physical systems: insights from game theory. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 9(2):186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    He S, Chen J, Li X, Shen XS, Sun Y (2014) Mobility and intruder prior information improving the barrier coverage of sparse sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(6):1268–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    He S, Chen J, Jiang F, Yau DK, Xing G, Sun Y (2013) Energy provisioning in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(10):1931–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gui J, & Zhou K (2016) Flexible adjustments between energy and capacity for topology control in heterogeneous wireless multi-hop networks. Journal of Network and Systems Management 1-24Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu Y, Dong M, Ota K, Liu A (2016) ActiveTrust: secure and trustable routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 11:2013–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu Q, Su Z, Guo S (2016) A game theoretical incentive scheme for relay selection services in mobile social networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(8):6692–6702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li H, Lin X, Yang H, Liang X, Lu R, Shen X (2014) EPPDR: an efficient privacy-preserving demand response scheme with adaptive key evolution in smart grid. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25(8):2053–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Long J, Dong M, Ota K, Liu A (2015) Green TDMA scheduling algorithm for prolonging Lifetime in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Syst J doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2448355.
  34. 34.
    Chen M, Ma Y, Song J, Lai C, Hu B (2016) Smart clothing: connecting human with clouds and big data for sustainable health monitoring. ACM/Springer Mob Netw Appl 21(5):825–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deng X, Li G, Dong M, Ota K (2017) Finding overlapping communities based on Markov chain and link clustering. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 10(2):411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stojmenovic I, Wen S, Huang X, Luan H (2015) An overview of fog computing and its security issues. Concurr Comput: Pract Experience 28(10):2991–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Al Faruque MA, Vatanparvar K (2016) Energy management-as-a-service over fog computing platform. IEEE Internet Things J 3(2):161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Samimi P, Teimouri Y, Mukhtar M (2016) A combinatorial double auction resource allocation model in cloud computing. Inf Sci 357:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baranwal G, Vidyarthi DP (2015) A fair multi-attribute combinatorial double auction model for resource allocation in cloud computing. J Syst Softw 108:60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dong M, Liu X, Qian Z et al (2015) QoE-ensured price competition model for emerging mobile networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 22(4):50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Samaan N (2014) A novel economic sharing model in a federation of selfish cloud providers. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25(1):12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Business and Management DivisionBeijing Normal University - Hong Kong Baptist University United International CollegeZhuhaiChina

Personalised recommendations