Outage performance improvement with cooperative relaying in cognitive radio networks
- 199 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the outage probability in three different relay modes, namely Amplify-and-Forward (AF), Decode-and-Forward (DF), and Hybrid Decode-Amplify-Forward (HDAF). We derive the closed-form outage probability expressions for cooperative communication. Our aim is to ensure the quality of service (QoS) of the primary link while minimizing the outage probability of the cognitive radio user. The cooperation based spectrum access is investigated at the secondary network. The cognitive transmitter will allocate low power if the quality of service is very rigid. Firstly, it is beneficial that the cooperation is obtained at the cognitive user from the surrounding cognitive users to decrease outage probability. Secondly, we select the best relay that can provide the minimal outage probability for cooperation. Finally, we investigate the outage probability under the peak and average interference constraints. The results indicate that the average interference constraints has lower outage probability than the peak interference constraints, due to the power adaptation between the transmitter and relay. The comparison among three cooperation relay modes shows that the HDAF outperforms the AF and DF. At the same time, we can see that the performance gain of the HDAF cooperation is better than the other modes, and a lower outage probability can be acquired as the number of potential relays increases.
Keywords
Cognitive radio Outage probability Cooperative relay Interference constraintsNotes
Acknowledgments
The work was supported partly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61473247, 61172064).
References
- 1.FCC (2002) Spectrum policy task force report. Rep. ET DocketGoogle Scholar
- 2.Li H, Liu B, Liu H (2008) Transmission schemes for multicarrier broadcast and unicast hybrid systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(11):4321–4330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Southwell R, Chen X, Huang J (2013) Quality of service satisfaction games of spectrum sharing. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 32(589-600):589–600Google Scholar
- 4.Goldsmith A, Jafar S, Maric I (2009) Breaking spectrum gridlock with cognitive radios: an information theoretic perspective. Proc IEEE 97(5):894–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Laneman J, Tse D, Wornell G (2004) Cooperative diversity in wireless network: efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 50(12):3062–3080CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.Bao X, Li J (2007) Efficient message relaying for wireless user cooperation: decode-amplify-forward and hybrid DAF and coded-cooperation. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 6(11):3975–3984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Musavian L, Aissa S, Lambotharan S (2010) Effective capacity for interference and delay constrained cognitive radio relay channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 9(5):1698–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Yue W, Zheng B, Meng Q (2011) Optimal power allocation for cognitive relay networks: amplify-and-forward versus selection relay. Sci China Inf Sci 54(4):861–872CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jing T, Zhu SX, Li HJ, Cheng XZ, Huo Y (2013) Cooperative relay selection in cognitive radio networks. Proc IEEE INFOCOM:175–179Google Scholar
- 10.Afana A, Ngatched TMN, Dobre OA (2015) Cooperative AF relaying with beamforming and limited feedback in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Commun Lett 19(3):491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kang X, Ying C, Nallanathan A (2008) Optimal power allocation for fading channels in cognitive radio networks: delay-limited capacity and outage capacity. In: Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), pp 1544–1548Google Scholar
- 12.Sun L, Wang W (2009) On study of achievable capacity with hybrid relay in cognitive radio networks. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- 13.Bao V, Duong T (2012) Exact outage probability of cognitive underlay DF relay networks with best relay selection. IEICE Trans Commun 95(6):2169–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Chen H, Liu J, Zhai C (2010) Performance analysis of SNR-based hybrid decode-amplify-forward cooperative diversity networks over Reyleigh fading channels. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp 1–6Google Scholar
- 15.Deng RL, Chen JM, Yuen C, Cheng P, Sun abd YX (2012) Energy-efficient cooperative spectrum sensing by optimal scheduling in sensor-aided cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(2):716–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Duy TT, Kong HY (2014) On performance evaluation of hybrid decode-amplify-forward relaying protocol with partial relay selection in underlay cognitive networks. J Commun Netw 16(5):502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sun C, Ben Letaief B (2008) User cooperation in heterogeneous cognitive radio networks with interference reduction. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp 3193–3197Google Scholar
- 18.Mahmood N, Yilmaz F, Oien G (2012) On hybrid cooperation in underlay cognitive radio networks. In: Signals of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), pp 308–312Google Scholar
- 19.Hasna M, Alouini M-S. (2003) End-to-end performance of transmission systems with relays over Rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2(6):1126–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Laneman J, Wornell W (2003) Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploting cooperative diversity in wireless networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 49(10):2415–2425CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar