Advertisement

Movement behaviour of fish, harvesting-induced habitat degradation and the optimal size of marine reserves

  • Yousef Alqawasmeh
  • Frithjof LutscherEmail author
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Many models have assessed how marine reserves protect fish populations and—under certain conditions—simultaneously increase yield. Only recently have models considered the effects of fishing-induced habitat damage by assuming reduced population growth in fishing areas. Even though it is understood that fish movement patterns affect the functioning and design of marine reserves, fishing-induced changes in movement patterns, as a response to decreased habitat quality, have not been studied in this context. Our work explores how harvesting-induced movement behaviour of fish can affect optimal yield and size of a marine reserve. Our model is based on reaction-diffusion equations and recent advances in their application to strongly heterogeneous environments with sharp transitions in environmental conditions. We model movement behaviour in response to harvesting and habitat destruction via increased diffusion rates and increased preference for protected areas, and implement reduced reproduction as an effect of habitat degradation. We find an alternative mechanistic explanation for the empirical observation that high fish mobility may not decrease fish density inside a reserve. We also find that movement-behavioural responses of fish to harvesting can decrease the economic value of protected areas and increase their conservation value. For maximum sustainable yield, we find that a low harvesting rate and small protected area are optimal when fish show a strong preference for protected areas as a response to fishing efforts. On the other hand, a high harvesting rate and a large protected area are optimal if fish respond to harvesting by a strong increase in movement rates in fishing areas.

Keywords

Fish movement behaviour Marine protected area Maximum sustainable yield Reaction-diffusion equation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

YA and FL thank Michael Neubert for inspiring discussions. FL gratefully acknowledges funding by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the Discovery Grants program (RGPIN-2016-04759) and a Discovery Accelerator Supplement (RGPAS-2016-492872). We also thank two reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Almany G, Hamilton RJ, Bode M, Matawai M, Potuku T, Saenz-Agudelo P, Planes S, Berumen M, Rhodes K, Thorrold S, Russ G, Jones G (2013) Dispersal of grouper larvae drives local resource sharing in a coral reef fishery. Curr Biol 23:626–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alqawasmeh Y (2017) Models for persistence and spread of structured populations in patchy landscapes. Phd thesis, University of Ottawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/36845
  3. Alqawasmeh Y, Lutscher F (2019) Persistence and spread of stage-structured populations in heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of Mathematical Biology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-018-1317-8
  4. Bohnsack J (1993) Marine reserves: they enhance fisheries, reduce conflicts, and protect resources. Oceanus 36(1):63Google Scholar
  5. Botsford L, Hastings A, Gaines S (2001) Dependence of sustainability on the configuration of marine reserves and larval dispersal distance. Ecol Lett 4(2):144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claudet J, Osenberg C, Domenici P, Badalamenti F, Milazzo M, Falcon J, Bertocci I, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Garcia-Charton J-A, Goni R, Borg J, Forcada A, Lucia GD, Perez-Ruzafa A, Afonso P, Brito A, Guala I, Direach L, Sanchez-Jerez P, Somerfield PJ, Planes S (2010) Marine reserves: fish life history and ecological traits matter. Ecol Appl 20(3):830–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman F, Williams S (2002) Overexploiting marine ecosystem engineers: potential consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 17(1):40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogarty M (2005) Impacts of fishing activities on benthic habitat and carrying capacity: approaches to assessing and managing risk. In: American fisheries society symposium, vol 41, pp 769Google Scholar
  9. Gell F, Roberts C (2003) Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 18(9):448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerber L, Botsford L, Hastings A, Possingham H, Gaines S, Palumbi S, Andelman S (2003) Population models for marine reserve design: a retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecol Appl 13:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green AL, Maypa AP, Almany G, Rhodes KL, Weeks R, Abesamis RA, Gleason MG, Mumby PJ, White AT (2015) Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design. Biol Rev 90:1215–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grüss A, Kaplan D, Guénette S, Roberts C, Botsford L (2011) Consequences of adult and juvenile movement for marine protected areas. J Biol Conserv 144:692–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison H, Williamson D, Evans R, Almany G, Thorrold S, Russ G, Feldheim K, van Herwerden L, Planes S, Srinivasan M, Berumen M, Jones G (2012) Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries. Curr Biol 22(11):1023–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastings A, Botsford LW (2006) Persistence of spatial populations depends on returning home. PNAS 103(15):6067–6072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiddink J, Jennings S, Kaiser M (2007) Assessing and predicting the relative ecological impacts of disturbance on habitats with different sensitivities. J Appl Ecol 44(2):405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hilborn R, Stokes K, Maguire J, Smith T, Botsford L, Mangel M, Orensanz J, Parma A, Rice J, Bell J, Cochrane K, Garcia S, Hall S, Kirkwood G, Sainsbury K, Stefansson G, Walters C (2004) When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean Coast Manag 47:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchings J (2000) Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature 406(16798):882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly M, Xing Y, Lenhart S (2016) Optimal fish harvesting for a population modeled by a nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation. Nat Resour Model 29:36–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langebrake J, Lambert L, Osenberg C, Leenheer PD (2012) Differential movement and movement bias models for marine protected areas. J Math Biol 64(4):667–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lester S, Halpern B, Grorud-Colvert K, Lubchenco J, Ruttenberg B, Gaines S, Airame S, Warner R (2009) Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 384:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockwood D, Hastings A, Botsford L (2002) The effects of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog? Theor Popul Biol 61:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maciel G, Lutscher F (2013) How individual movement response to hapitat edge effects population persistence and spatial spread. Am Nat 182:42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maciel G, Lutscher F (2015) Allee effects and population spread in patchy landscapes. J Biol Dyn 9(1):109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millar R (1992) Estimating the size-selectivity of fishing gear by conditioning on the total catch. J Am Stat Assoc 87(420):962–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moberg E, Shyu E, Herrera G, Lenhart S, Lou Y, Neubert M (2015) On the bioeconomics of marine reserves when dispersal evolves. Nat Resour Model 28:456–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moeller H, Neubert M (2013) Habitat damage, marine reserves, and the value of spatial management. Ecol Appl 23:959–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mosquera I, Côté I, Jennings S, Reynolds J (2000) Conservation benefits of marine reserves for fish populations. Anim Conserv 4:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neubert M (2003) Marine reserves and optimal harvesting. Ecol Lett 6(9):843–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neubert M, Caswell H (2000) Density-dependent vital rates and their population dynamic consequences. J Math Biol 41:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsgard F, Schaanning M, Widdicombe S, Kendall M, Austen M (2008) Effects of bottom trawling on ecosystem functioning. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366(1–2):123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ovaskainen O, Cornell S (2003) Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes. J Appl Probab 40:557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reeve J, Cronin J (2010) Edge behaviour in a minute parasitic wasp. J Animal Ecol 79:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts C, Bohnsack J, Gell F, Hawking J, Goodridge R (2001) Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294(5548):1920–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schultz C, Crone E (2001) Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82:1879–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsikliras A, Polymeros K (2014) Fish market prices drive overfishing of the big ones. PeerJ 2:e638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White J (2015) Marine reserve design theory for species with ontogenetic migration. R Soc 11(1):20140511–20140511Google Scholar
  37. Yurk B, Cobbold C (2018) Homogenization techniques for population dynamics in strongly heterogeneous landscapes. J Biol Dyn 12:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations