Interaction strength revisited—clarifying the role of energy flux for food web stability
- 811 Downloads
Interaction strength (IS) has been theoretically shown to play a major role in governing the stability and dynamics of food webs. Nonetheless, its definition has been varied and problematic, including a range of recent definitions based on biological rates associated with model parameters (e.g., attack rate). Results from food web theory have been used to argue that IS metrics based on energy flux ought to have a clear relationship with stability. Here, we use simple models to elucidate the actual relationship between local stability and a number of common IS metrics (total flux and per capita fluxes) as well as a more recently suggested metric. We find that the classical IS metrics map to stability in a more complex way than suggested by existing food web theory and that the new IS metric has a much clearer, and biologically interpretable, relationship with local stability. The total energy flux metric falls off existing theoretical predictions when the total resource productivity available to the consumer is reduced despite increased consumer attack rates. The density of a consumer can hence decrease when its attack rate increases. This effect, called the paradox of attack rate, is similar to the well-known hydra effect and can even cascade up a food chain to exclude a predator when consumer attack rate is increased.
KeywordsHydra effect Paradox of attack rate Paradox of searching efficiency Rosenzweig-MacArthur Lotka-Volterra Logistic growth
The study was financed by a post doc grant from the Swedish Research Council to Karin Nilsson. We thank Lauri Oksanen and Gabriel Gellner for inspiration and discussion, Amanda Caskenette for language editing, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- McCann KS (2012) Food webs vol 50. Monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. In: Consumer-resource dynamics, vol Volume 36. Monographs in Population Biology 1-462Google Scholar
- Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC (1998) Ecological dynamics. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Wootton JT, Emmerson M (2005) Measurement of interaction strength in nature. In: Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, vol 36. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. pp 419-444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175535