Advertisement

Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 107–115 | Cite as

The phylogenetic component of food web structure and intervality

  • Anna Eklöf
  • Daniel B. Stouffer
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Despite the exceptional complexity formed by species and their interactions in ecological networks, such as food webs, regularities in the network structures are repeatedly demonstrated. The interactions are determined by the characteristics of a species. The characteristics are in turn determined by the species’ phylogenetic relationships, but also by factors not related to evolutionary history. Here, we test whether species’ phylogenetic relationships provides a significant proxy for food web intervality. We thereafter quantify the degree to which different species traits remain valuable predictors of food web structure after the baseline effect of species’ relatedness has been removed. We find that the phylogenetic relationships provide a significant background from which to estimate food web intervality and thereby structure. However, we also find that there is an important, non-negligible part of some traits, e.g., body size, in food webs that is not accounted for by the phylogenetic relationships. Additionally, both these relationships differ depending if a predator or a prey perspective is adopted. Clearly, species’ evolutionary history as well as traits not determined by phylogenetic relationships shapes predator-prey interactions in food webs, and the underlying evolutionary processes take place on slightly different time scales depending on the direction of predator-prey adaptations.

Keywords

Ecological networks Food web Intervality Phylogenetic correction Taxonomy Traits 

Notes

Acknowledgments

AE acknowledges the support of Swedish Research Council Grant for Young Researchers. DBS acknowledges a Marsden Fund Fast-Start grant (UOC-1101) and Rutherford Discovery Fellowship, both administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. The authors also thank Ute Jacob for agreeing to share the trait data.

Supplementary material

12080_2015_273_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (128 kb)
(PDF 127 KB)

References

  1. Allesina S (2011) Predicting trophic relations in ecological networks: a test of the allometric diet breadth model. J Theor Biol 279(1):161–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allesina S, Alonso D, Pascual M (2008) A general model for food web structure. Science 320(5876):658–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bersier L, Kehrli P (2008) The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food web structure. Ecol Compl 5(2):132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomberg S, Garland T, Ives A (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4):717–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Briand F, Cohen JE (1984) Community food webs have scale-invariant structure. Nature 307:264–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler MA, Schoener TW, Losos JB (2000) The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in greater antillean anolis lizards. Evolution 54(1):259–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cadle JE, Greene HW (1993) Phylogenetic patterns, biogeography, and the ecological structure of neotropical assemblages. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattin M, Bersier L, Banaṡek-Richter C, Baltensperger R, Gabriel J (2004) Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food web structure. Nature 427(6977):835–839CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavalli-Sforza L, Piazza A (1975) Analysis of evolution: evolutionary rates, independence and treeness. Theor Popul Biol 8(2):127–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12(7):693–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Christian R, Luczkovich J (1999) Organizing and understanding a winter’s seagrass foodweb network through effective trophic levels. Ecol Model 117(1):99–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J (1978) Food webs and niche space. 11. Princeton Univ PrGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen J, Newman C (1985) A stochastic theory of community food webs: I. models and aggregated data. Proc Roy Soc Lond B: Bio 224(1237):421–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen J, Schittler D, Raffaelli D, Reuman D (2009) Food webs are more than the sum of their tritrophic parts. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106(52):22,335–22,340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen JE (1977) Food webs and the dimensionality of trophic niche space. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74(10):4533–4536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Eklöf A, Helmus MR, Moore M, Allesina S (2012) Relevance of evolutionary history for food web structure. Proc Roy Soc Lond B: Bio 279(1733):1588–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eklöf A, Jacob U, Kopp J, Bosch J, Castro-Urgal R, Chacoff N P, Dalsgaard B, Sassi C, Galetti M, Guimarães PR et al (2013) The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecol Lett 16(5): 577–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Emerson B, Gillespie R (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23(11):619–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forbes SA (1887) The lake as a microcosm. Bull Sci Assoc, Peoria, pp 77–87Google Scholar
  21. Gardner JL, Peters A, Kearney MR, Joseph L, Heinsohn R (2011) Declining body size: a third universal response to warming? Trends Ecol Evol 26(6):285–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155(3):346–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 326(1233):119–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen TF, Martins EP (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution:1404–1417Google Scholar
  25. Helmus MR, Bland TJ, Williams CK, Ives AR (2007) Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity. Am Nat 169(3):E68–E83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchinson G (1957) The multivariate niche. Cold Spr Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacob U (2005) Trophic dynamics of antarctic shelf ecosystems—food webs and energy flow budgets, thesis. University of Bremen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacob U, Thierry A, Brose U, Arntz W, Berg S, Brey T, Fetzer I, Jonsson T, Mintenbeck K, Mollmann C et al (2011) The role of body size in complex food webs: a cold case. Adv Ecol Res 45:181–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Köster FW, Trippel EA, Tomkiewicz J (2013) Linking size and age at sexual maturation to body growth, productivity and recruitment of Atlantic cod stocks spanning the north atlantic. Fish Res 138:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacDonald N (1979) Simple aspects of foodweb complexity. J Theor Biol 80(4):577–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez ND (1992) Constant connectance in community food webs. Am Nat 139(6):1208–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21(4):178–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Messier J, McGill BJ, Lechowicz MJ (2010) How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecol Lett 13(7):838–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Naisbit RE, Rohr RP, Rossberg AG, Kehrli P, Bersier LF (2012) Phylogeny versus body size as determinants of food web structure. Proc Roy Soc Lond B: Bio rspb20120327Google Scholar
  35. Neubert MG, Blumenshine SC, Duplisea DE, Jonsson T, Rashleigh B (2000) Body size and food web structure: testing the equiprobability assumption of the cascade model. Oecologia 123:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Optiz S (1996) Trophic interactions in Caribbean coral reefs. Tech. Rep. 43. ICLARM, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  37. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Petchey O, Beckerman A, Riede J, Warren P (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105(11):4191–4196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org
  41. Rao C (1965) Linear statistical inference and its applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Rao C, Toutenberg H, Shalabh, Heumann C (2010) Linear Models and Generalizations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. Rezende EL, Albert EM, Fortuna MA, Bascompte J (2009) Compartments in a marine food web associated with phylogeny, body mass, and habitat structure. Ecol Lett 12(8):779–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Riede J, Rall B, Banasek-Richter C, Navarrete S, Wieters E, Emmerson M, Jacob U, Brose U (2010) Scaling of food web properties with diversity and complexity across ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 42:139–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Riede JO, Brose U, Ebenman B, Jacob U, Thompson R, Townsend CR, Jonsson T (2011) Stepping in eltons footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14(2):169–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rohlf FJ (2001) Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55(11):2143–2160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rohlf FJ (2006) A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60(7):1509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rohr RP, Scherer H, Kehrli P, Mazza C, Bersier LF (2010) Modeling food webs: exploring unexplained structure using latent traits. Am Nat 176(2):170–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rossberg A, Matsuda H, Amemiya T, Itoh K (2006) Food webs: experts consuming families of experts. J Theor Biol 241(3):552–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rossberg AG, Brännström Å, Dieckmann U (2010) food web structure in low-and high-dimensional trophic niche spaces. J R Soc Interface 7(53):1735–1743CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheridan JA, Bickford D (2011) Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 1(8):401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1962) The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon 11(2):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stouffer D, Camacho J, Amaral L (2006) A robust measure of food web intervality. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103(50):19,015–19,020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stouffer D, Rezende E, Amaral L (2011) The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food web structure. J Anim Ecol 80(3):632–639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Stouffer DB, Camacho J, Guimerà R, Ng CA, Amaral LAN (2005) Quantitative patterns in the structure of model and empirical food webs. Ecology 86:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stouffer DB, Sales-Pardo M, Sirer MI, Bascompte J (2012) Evolutionary conservation of species’ roles in food webs. Science 335(6075):1489–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sugihara G (1982) Niche hierarchy: Structure, organization, and assembly in natural communities. PhD thesis. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  58. Sugihara G (1984) Graph theory, homology, and food webs. In: Levin SA (ed) Population biology, American Mathematical Society, vol 30. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Providence, pp 83–101Google Scholar
  59. Thompson J (1994) The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vamosi JC, Vamosi SM (2007) Body size, rarity, and phylogenetic community structure: insights from diving beetle assemblages of Alberta. Divers Distrib 13(1):1–10Google Scholar
  61. Warren PH, Lawton JH (1987) Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams R, Martinez N (2000) Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404(6774):180–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zook A, Eklöf A, Jacob U, Allesina S (2011) Food webs: ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality. J Theor Biol 271(1):106–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveiliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations