# Functional responses and predator–prey models: a critique of ratio dependence

- 891 Downloads
- 5 Citations

## Abstract

Arditi and Ginzburg (2012) propose ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with ratio-dependent functional responses as the new null model for predation, based on their earlier work on ratio-dependent food chains and a number of functional response measurements. Here, I discuss some of their claims, arguing for a flexible and problem-driven approach to predator–prey modeling. Models to understand population cycles and models to predict the effect of basal enrichment on food chains need not be the same. While ratio-dependent functional responses in ODE models might sometimes be useful as limit cases for food chains, they are not intrinsically more useful than prey-dependent models to understand the effect of a given predator on prey population dynamics—and sometimes less useful, given the small temporal scales considered in many models. “Instantism” is showed to be an invalid criticism when ODEs are interpreted as describing average trajectories of stochastic birth–death processes. Moreover, other modeling frameworks with strong ties to time series statistics, such as stochastic difference equations, should be promoted to improve the feedback loop between field and theoretical research. The main problems of current trophic ecology do not lie in a wrong null model, as ecologists have already several at their disposal. The loose connection of ODE models with empirical data and spatial/temporal scaling up of empirical measurements constitute more serious challenges to our understanding of trophic interactions and their consequences on ecosystem functioning.

## Keywords

Consumer dependence Autoregressive models Kill rate Predation rate Trophic communities Exploitation ecosystems## Notes

### Acknowledgments

For exchanges on the concepts discussed here, I thank D. J. Murrell, J.A. Henden, J. Matthiopoulos, L. New, S. Redpath, G. Gauthier, and N.G. Yoccoz. D.J. Murrell provided detailed comments on a previous version. Two referees and the editor made constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript. Thanks to the participants of the ResearchGate Stochastic Processes list for help with model formulation in Fig. 2.

## References

- Abrams PA (1994) The fallacies of “ratio-dependent” predation. Ecology 75(6):1842–1850Google Scholar
- Abrams P (1997) Anomalous predictions of ratio-dependent models of predation. Oikos 80(1):163–171Google Scholar
- Abrams P, Ginzburg L (2000) The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol Evol 15(8):337–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams P, Roth J (1994) The effects of enrichment of three-species food chains with nonlinear functional responses. Ecology 75(4):1118–1130Google Scholar
- Abrams PA, Walters CJ (1996) Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology 77(4):1125–1133Google Scholar
- Ahrens RN, Walters CJ, Christensen V (2011) Foraging arena theory. Fish Fish 13(1):41–59Google Scholar
- Akcakaya H (1992) Population cycles of mammals: evidence for a ratio-dependent predation hypothesis. Ecol Monogr 62(1):119–142Google Scholar
- Andersson M, Erlinge S (1977) Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos 29(3):591–597Google Scholar
- Arditi R, Ginzburg L (1989) Coupling in predator–prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J Theor Biol 139(3):311–326Google Scholar
- Arditi R, Ginzburg LR (2012) How species interact: altering the standard view on trophic ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Barraquand F, Murrell DJ (2012) Evolutionarily stable consumer home range size in relation to resource demography and consumer spatial organization. Theor Ecol 5(4):567–589Google Scholar
- Barraquand F, Murrell D (2013) Scaling up predator–prey dynamics using spatial moment equations. Methods Ecol Evol 4(3):276–289Google Scholar
- Barraquand F, Inchausti P, Bretagnolle V (2009) Cognitive abilities of a central place forager interact with prey spatial aggregation in their effect on intake rate. Anim Behav 78(2):505–514Google Scholar
- Bartlett MS (1957) On theoretical models for competitive and predatory biological systems. Biometrika 44(1/2):27–42Google Scholar
- Beddington J (1975) Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol 44:331–340Google Scholar
- Begon M, Bennett M, Bowers R, French N, Hazel S, Turner J (2002) A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: numbers, densities and areas. Epidemiol Infect 129(1):147–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berryman A, Michalski J, Gutierrez A, Arditi R (1995) Logistic theory of food web dynamics. Ecology 76(2):336–343Google Scholar
- Bêty J, Gauthier G, Giroux JF, Korpimäki E (2001) Are goose nesting success and lemming cycles linked? Interplay between nest density and predators. Oikos 93(3):388–400Google Scholar
- Bêty J, Gauthier G, Korpimäki E, Giroux J (2002) Shared predators and indirect trophic interactions: lemming cycles and arctic-nesting geese. J Anim Ecol 71(1):88–98Google Scholar
- Bjørnstad O, Stenseth N, Saitoh T (1999) Synchrony and scaling in dynamics of voles and mice in northern Japan. Ecology 80(2):622–637Google Scholar
- Bolker B (2004) Continuous-space models for population dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti O (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution in metapopulations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 45–69Google Scholar
- Brose U, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2006) Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. Ecol Lett 9(11):1228–1236PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Charnov E, Orians G, Hyatt K (1976) Ecological implications of resource depression. Am Nat 110(972):247–259Google Scholar
- Cosner C, DeAngelis D, Ault J, Olson D (1999) Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. Theor Popul Biol 56(1):65–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cox D, Isham V (1980) Point processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
- de Roos A, McCauley E, Wilson W (1991) Mobility versus density-limited predator–prey dynamics on different spatial scales. Biol Sci 246(1316):117–122Google Scholar
- DeAngelis DL, Goldstein RA, O’Neill RV (1975) A model for trophic interaction. Ecology 56:881–892Google Scholar
- Elmhagen B, Ludwig G, Rushton S, Helle P, Linden H (2010) Top predators, mesopredators and their prey: interference ecosystems along bioclimatic productivity gradients. J Anim Ecol 79(4):785–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erbach A, Lutscher F, Seo G (2013) Bistability and limit cycles in generalist predator–prey dynamics. Ecol Complex 14:48–55Google Scholar
- Fenton A, Spencer M, Montagnes D (2010) Parameterising variable assimilation efficiency in predator–prey models. Oikos 119(6):1000–1010Google Scholar
- Fryxell J, Lundberg P (1998) Individual behavior and community dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fryxell J, Mosser A, Sinclair A, Packer C (2007) Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics. Nature 449(7165):1041–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulton E, Smith A, Johnson C (2003) Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:1–16Google Scholar
- Fussmann G, Blasius B (2005) Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure. Biol Lett 1(1):9–12PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fussmann GF, Weithoff G, Yoshida T (2005) A direct, experimental test of resource vs. consumer dependence. Ecology 86(11):2924–2930Google Scholar
- Fussmann G, Weithoff G, Yoshida T (2007) A direct, experimental test of resource vs. consumer dependence: reply. Ecology 88(6):1603–1604Google Scholar
- Garrott R, Bruggeman J, Becker M, Kalinowski S, White P (2007) Evaluating prey switching in wolf-ungulate systems. Ecol Appl 17(6):1588–1597PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gatto M (1991) Some remarks on models of plankton densities in lakes. Am Nat 137(2):264–267Google Scholar
- Gauthier G, Berteaux D, Bêty J, Tarroux A, Therrien J, McKinnon L, Legagneux P, Cadieux M (2011) The tundra food web of Bylot Island in a changing climate and the role of exchanges between ecosystems. Ecoscience 18(3):223–235Google Scholar
- Geritz S, Kisdi E (2004) On the mechanistic underpinning of discrete-time population models with complex dynamics. J Theor Biol 228(2):261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Getz WM (1984) Population dynamics: a per capita resource approach. J Theor Biol 108(4):623–643Google Scholar
- Gilg O, Hanski I, Sittler B (2003) Cyclic dynamics in a simple vertebrate predator–prey community. Science 301(5646):866–868Google Scholar
- Gilg O, Sittler B, Sabard B, Hurstel A, Sané R, Delattre P, Hanski I (2006) Functional and numerical responses of four lemming predators in high arctic Greenland. Oikos 113(2):193–216Google Scholar
- Ginzburg L, Jensen C (2004) Rules of thumb for judging ecological theories. Trends Ecol Evol 19(3):121–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansen T, Stenseth N, Henttonen H (1999) Multiannual vole cycles and population regulation during long winters: an analysis of seasonal density dependence. Am Nat 154(2):129–139Google Scholar
- Hanski I, Korpimäki E (1995) Microtine rodent dynamics in northern Europe: parameterized models for the predator–prey interaction. Ecology 76(3):840–850Google Scholar
- Hanski I, Henttonen H, Korpimaki E, Oksanen L, Turchin P (2001) Small-rodent dynamics and predation. Ecology 82(6):1505–1520Google Scholar
- Hassell M (2000) Host-parasitoid population dynamics. J Anim Ecol 69(4):543–566Google Scholar
- Higgins K, Hastings A, Sarvela J, Botsford L (1997) Stochastic dynamics and deterministic skeletons: population behavior of dungeness crab. Science 276(5317):1431–1435Google Scholar
- Hone J, Krebs C, O’Donoghue M, Boutin S (2007) Evaluation of predator numerical responses. Wildl Res 34(5):335–341Google Scholar
- Hu H, Nigmatulina K, Eckhoff P (2013) The scaling of contact rates with population density for the infectious disease models. Math Biosci 244:125–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huxley J (1934) A natural experiment on the territorial instinct. Brit Birds 27(10):270–277Google Scholar
- Ives A, Dennis B, Cottingham K, Carpenter S (2003) Estimating community stability and ecological interactions from time-series data. Ecol Monogr 73(2):301–330Google Scholar
- Ives AR, Einarsson Á, Jansen VA, Gardarsson A (2008) High-amplitude fluctuations and alternative dynamical states of midges in Lake Myvatn. Nature 452(7183):84–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jost C, Arditi R (2001) From pattern to process: identifying predatorprey models from time-series data. Popul Ecol 43(3):229–243Google Scholar
- Jost C, Ellner SP (2000) Testing for predator dependence in predatorprey dynamics: a non-parametric approach. Proc Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 267(1453):1611–1620Google Scholar
- Jost C, Devulder G, Vucetich J, Peterson R, Arditi R (2005) The wolves of Isle Royale display scale-invariant satiation and ratio-dependent predation on moose. J Anim Ecol 74(5):809–816Google Scholar
- Kendall B, Prendergast J, Bjørnstad O (1998) The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in population cycles. Ecol Lett 1(3):160–164Google Scholar
- Kendall B, Briggs C, Murdoch W, Turchin P, Ellner S, McCauley E, Nisbet R, Wood S (1999) Why do populations cycle? A synthesis of statistical and mechanistic modeling approaches. Ecology 80(6):1789–1805Google Scholar
- Kharitonov S, Volkov A, Willems F, van Kleef H, Klaassen R, Nowak D, Nowak A, Bublichenko A (2008) Brent goose colonies near snowy owls: internet distances in relation to abundance of lemmings and arctic foxes. Biol Bull 35(3):270–278Google Scholar
- King C, Powell R (2007) The natural history of weasels and stoats: ecology, behavior, and management. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- King A, Schaffer W (2001) The geometry of a population cycle: a mechanistic model of snowshoe hare demography. Ecology 82(3):814–830Google Scholar
- Klemola T, Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K, Tanhuanpää M, Koivula M (1999) Mobility and habitat utilization of small mustelids in relation to cyclically fluctuating prey abundances. Ann Zool Fenn 36(2):75–82Google Scholar
- Krebs CJ (2011) Of lemmings and snowshoe hares: the ecology of northern Canada. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278(1705):481–489Google Scholar
- Krebs CJ (2013) Population fluctuations in rodents. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lande R, Engen S, Sæther B (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- Leslie P (1948) Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika 35(3/4):213–245Google Scholar
- Lundberg P, Fryxell J (1995) Expected population density versus productivity in ratio-dependent and prey-dependent models. Am Nat 146(1):153–161Google Scholar
- Matthiopoulos J, Graham K, Smout S, Asseburg C, Redpath S, Thirgood S, Hudson P, Harwood J (2007) Sensitivity to assumptions in models of generalist predation on a cyclic prey. Ecology 88(10):2576–2586PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matthiopoulos J, Smout S, Winship A, Thompson D, Boyd I, Harwood J (2008) Getting beneath the surface of marine mammal–fisheries competition. Mamm Rev 38(2–3):167–188Google Scholar
- May R (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Maynard Smith J, Slatkin M (1973) The stability of predator–prey systems. Ecology 54(2):384–391Google Scholar
- McCallum H, Barlow N, Hone J (2001) How should pathogen transmission be modelled? Trends Ecol Evol 16(6):295–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCann K (2011) Food webs. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- McCauley E, Wilson W, de Roos A (1993) Dynamics of age-structured and spatially structured predator–prey interactions: individual-based models and population-level formulations. Am Nat 142(3):412PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCauley E, Wilson W, de Roos A (1996) Dynamics of age-structured predator–prey populations in space: asymmetrical effects of mobility in juvenile and adult predators. Oikos 76(3):485–497Google Scholar
- McKane A, Newman T (2005) Predator–prey cycles from resonant amplification of demographic stochasticity. Phys Rev Lett 94(21):218102PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merrill E, Sand H, Zimmermann B, McPhee H, Webb N, Hebblewhite M, Wabakken P, Frair JL (2010) Building a mechanistic understanding of predation with GPS-based movement data. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1550):2279–2288Google Scholar
- Moran PA (1953) The statistical analysis of the canadian lynx cycle. 1. Structure and prediction. Aust Can J Zool 1(2):163–173Google Scholar
- Murdoch W, Briggs C, Nisbet R (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Murrell D (2005) Local spatial structure and predator–prey dynamics: counterintuitive effects of prey enrichment. Am Nat 166(3):354–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
- New L, Matthiopoulos J, Redpath S, Buckland S (2009) Fitting models of multiple hypotheses to partial population data: investigating the causes of cycles in red grouse. Am Nat 174(3):399–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
- New L, Buckland S, Redpath S, Matthiopoulos J (2012) Modelling the impact of hen harrier management measures on a red grouse population in the UK. Oikos 121(7):1061–1072Google Scholar
- Nielsen Ó (1999) Gyrfalcon predation on ptarmigan: numerical and functional responses. J Anim Ecol 68(5):1034–1050Google Scholar
- Nilsson I, Nilsson S, Sylven M (1982) Diet choice, resource depression, and the regular nest spacing of birds of prey. Biol J Linn Soc 18(1):1–9Google Scholar
- Nisbet R, Gurney W (1976) A simple mechanism for population cycles. Nature 263:319–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nisbet R, Gurney W (1982) Modelling fluctuating populations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen L, Oksanen T (2000) The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. Am Nat 155:703–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen L, Fretwell S, Arruda J, Memela P (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118(2):240–261Google Scholar
- Oksanen T, Oksanen L, Schneider M, Aunapuu M (2001) Regulation, cycles and stability in northern carnivore-herbivore systems: back to first principles. Oikos 94(1):101–117Google Scholar
- Oksanen T, Oksanen L, Dahlgren J, Olofsson J (2008) Arctic lemmings, Lemmus spp. and Dicrostonyx spp.: integrating ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Evol Ecol Res 10(3):415–434Google Scholar
- Pachepsky E, Nisbet R, Murdoch W (2008) Between discrete and continuous: consumer-resource dynamics with synchronized reproduction. Ecology 89(1):280–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peckarsky B, Abrams P, Bolnick D, Dill L, Grabowski J, Luttbeg B, Orrock J, Peacor S, Preisser E, Schmitz O (2008) Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator–prey interactions. Ecology 89(9):2416–2425PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pineda-Krch M, Blok J, Dieckmann U, Doebeli M (2007) A tale of two cycles-distinguishing quasi-cycles and limit cycles in finite predator–prey populations. Oikos 116(1):53Google Scholar
- Poggiale J, Michalski J, Arditi R (1998) Emergence of donor control in patchy predator–prey systems. Bull Math Biol 60(6):1149– 1166Google Scholar
- Post E, Stenseth N, Peterson R, Vucetich J, Ellis A (2002) Phase dependence and population cycles in a large-mammal predator–prey system. Ecology 83(11):2997–3002Google Scholar
- Rall BC, Guill C, Brose U (2008) Food-web connectance and predator interference dampen the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 117:202–213Google Scholar
- Redpath S, Mougeot F, Leckie F, Elston D, Hudson P (2006) Testing the role of parasites in driving the cyclic population dynamics of a gamebird. Ecol Lett 9(4):410–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renshaw E (1993) Modelling biological populations in space and time, vol 11. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Ripa J, Ives AR (2003) Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments. Theor Popul Biol 64(3):369–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rohani P, King AA (2010) Never mind the length, feel the quality: the impact of long-term epidemiological data sets on theory, application and policy. Trends Ecol Evol 25(10):611–618PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenzweig M (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171(3969):385–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenzweig M, MacArthur R (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator–prey interactions. Am Nat 97:209–223Google Scholar
- Roughgarden J (1998) Primer of ecological theory. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Royama T (1992) Analytical population dynamics. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sabelis M, Janssen A, Diekmann O, Jansen V (2005) Global persistence despite local extinction in acarine predator–prey systems: lessons from experimental and mathematical exercises. Adv Ecol Res 37:183–220Google Scholar
- Sheriff M, Krebs C, Boonstra R (2010) The ghosts of predators past: population cycles and the role of maternal programming under fluctuating predation risk. Ecology 91(10):2983–2994PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skalski G, Gilliam J (2001) Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82(11):3083–3092Google Scholar
- Smout S, Lindstrøm U (2007) Multispecies functional response of the minke whale
*Balaenoptera acutorostrata*based on small-scale foraging studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:277–291Google Scholar - Stenseth NC (1999) Population cycles in voles and lemmings: density dependence and phase dependence in a stochastic world. Oikos 87(3):427–461Google Scholar
- Stenseth NC, Bjørnstad ON, Falck W (1996) Is spacing behaviour coupled with predation causing the microtine density cycle? A synthesis of current process-oriented and pattern-oriented studies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263(1376):1423–1435Google Scholar
- Stenseth NC, Falck W, Chan KS, Bjørnstad ON, O’ Donoghue M, Tong H, Boonstra R, Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Yoccoz NG (1998) From patterns to processes: phase and density dependencies in the canadian lynx cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(26):15430–15435PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stenseth NC, Leirs H, Mercelis S, Mwanjabe P (2001) Comparing strategies for controlling an African pest rodent: an empirically based theoretical study. J Appl Ecol 38(5):1020–1031Google Scholar
- Stephens D, Brown J, Ydenberg R (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Taylor R (1984) Predation. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Taylor RA, Sherratt JA, White A (2012) Seasonal forcing and multi-year cycles in interacting populations: lessons from a predator–prey model. J Math Biol 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0612-z
- Tornberg R, Lindèn A, Byholm P, Ranta E, Valkama J, Helle P, Lindèn H (2013) Coupling in goshawk and grouse population dynamics in Finland. Oecologia 171(4):863–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turchin P, Batzli G (2001) Availability of food and the population dynamics of arvicoline rodents. Ecology 82(6):1521–1534Google Scholar
- Turchin P, Ellner S (2000) Living on the edge of chaos: population dynamics of fennoscandian voles. Ecology 81(11):3099–3116Google Scholar
- Turchin P, Hanski I (1997) An empirically based model for latitudinal gradient in vole population dynamics. Am Nat 149(5):842– 874PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turchin P, Ostfeld R (1997) Effects of density and season on the population rate of change in the meadow vole. Oikos 78(2):355–361Google Scholar
- Tyson R, Haines S, Hodges K (2010) Modelling the Canada lynx and snowshoe hare population cycle: the role of specialist predators. Theor Ecol 3(2):97–111Google Scholar
- Tyutyunov Y, Titova L, Arditi R (2008) Predator interference emerging from trophotaxis in predator–prey systems: an individual-based approach. Ecol Complex 5(1):48–58Google Scholar
- Vik JO, Brinch CN, Boutin S, Stenseth NC (2008) Interlinking hare and lynx dynamics using a century’s worth of annual data. Popul Ecol 50(3):267–274Google Scholar
- Vonesh JR, Bolker BM (2005) Compensatory larval responses shift trade-offs associated with predator-induced hatching plasticity. Ecology 86(6):1580–1591Google Scholar
- Vucetich J, Peterson R (2004a) The influence of top–down, bottom–up and abiotic factors on the moose (
*Alces alces*) population of Isle Royale. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271(1535):183– 189Google Scholar - Vucetich J, Peterson R (2004b) The influence of prey consumption and demographic stochasticity on population growth rate of isle royale wolves
*Canis lupus*. Oikos 107(2):309–320Google Scholar - Vucetich J, Peterson R, Schaefer C (2002) The effect of prey and predator densities on wolf predation. Ecology 83(11):3003–3013Google Scholar
- Vucetich J, Hebblewhite M, Smith D, Peterson R (2011) Predicting prey population dynamics from kill rate, predation rate and predator–prey ratios in three wolf-ungulate systems. J Anim Ecol 80(6):1236–1245PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walters C, Kitchell JF (2001) Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58(1):39–50Google Scholar
- Wilson D, Bromley R (2001) Functional and numerical responses of predators to cyclic lemming abundance: effects on loss of goose nests. Can J Zool 79(3):525–532Google Scholar
- Wilson W, De Roos A, McCauley E (1993) Spatial instabilities within the diffusive Lotka–Volterra system: individual-based simulation results. Theor Popul Biol 43(1):91–127Google Scholar
- Wilson W, McCauley E, De Roos A (1995) Effect of dimensionality on Lotka–Volterra predator–prey dynamics: individual based simulation results. Bull Math Biol 57(4):507–526Google Scholar
- Yodzis P (1994) Predator–prey theory and management of multispecies fisheries. Ecol Appl 4(1):51–58Google Scholar