Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 213–223 | Cite as

The role of sex separation in neutral speciation

  • Elizabeth M. Baptestini
  • Marcus A. M. de Aguiar
  • Yaneer Bar-Yam
Original Paper

Abstract

Neutral speciation mechanisms based on isolation by distance and assortative mating, termed topopatric, has recently been shown to describe the observed patterns of abundance distributions and species–area relationships. Previous works have considered this type of process only in the context of hermaphroditic populations. In this work, we extend a hermaphroditic model of topopatric speciation to populations where individuals are explicitly separated into males and females. We show that for a particular carrying capacity, speciation occurs under similar conditions, but the number of species generated is lower than in the hermaphroditic case. As a consequence, the species–area curve has lower exponents, especially at intermediate scales. Evolution results in fewer species having more abundant populations.

Keywords

Neutral speciation Assortative mating Biodiversity patterns Sex separation 

Supplementary material

12080_2012_172_MOESM1_ESM.ps (2 mb)
ESM 1(PS 2066 kb)

References

  1. Arrhenius O (1921) Specie and area. J Ecol 9:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashlock D, Clare EL, von Königslöw TE, Ashlock W (2010) Evolution and instability in ring species complexes: an in silico approach to the study of speciation. JTB 264:1202–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banavar J, Maritan A (2009) Towards a theory of biodiversity. Nature 460:334–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baptestini EM, de Aguiar MAM, Araujo MS, Bolnick D (2009) The shape of the competition and carrying capacity kernels affects the likelihood of disruptive selection. JTB 259:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolnick D, Doebeli M (2003) Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M (2012) The relationship between intraspecific assortative mating and reproductive isolation between divergent populations. Current Zoology 58(3):484–492Google Scholar
  7. Cannings C (1974) The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics; a new approach, haploid models. Adv Appl Prob 6:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  9. de Aguiar MAM, Bar-Yam Y (2011) The Moran model as a dynamical process on networks and its implications for neutral speciation. Phys Rev E 84:031901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Aguiar MAM, Baranger M, Baptestini EM, Kaufman L, Bar-Yam Y (2009) Global patterns of specation and diversity. Nature 460:384–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desjardins-Proulx P, Gravel D (2012) A complex speciation-richness relationship in a simple neutral model. arXiv:1203.3884v1 [q-bio.PE]Google Scholar
  12. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M (1999) On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M (2000) Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am Nat 156:S77–S101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2003) Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etienne RS, Haegeman B (2011) The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation. Theor Ecol 4:87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewens WJ (1979) Mathematical population genetics I. Theoretical introduction series: biomathematics, Vol. 9. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick BM, Fordyce JA, Gavrilets S (2009) Pattern, process and geographic modes of speciation. J Evol Biol 22:2342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Gavrilets S, Cruzan MB (1998) Neutral gene flow across single locus cline. Evolution 52(5):1277–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gavrilets S, Arnqvist G, Friberg U (2000) The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:531–539. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie JH (2004) Population genetics: a concise guide. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorelick R, Heng HHQ (2011) Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review. Evolution 65:1088–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haerty W, Singh RS (2006) Gene regulation divergence is a major contributor to the evolution of Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities between species of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 23(9):1707–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgs P, Derrida B (1991) Stochastic models for species formation in evolving populations. J Phys A 24:L985–L991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Higgs P, Derrida B (1992) Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. J Mol Evol 35:454–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoelzer GA, Drewes R, Meier J, Doursat R (2008) Isolation-by-distance and outbreeding depression are sufficient to drive parapatric speciation in the absence of environmental influences. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubbell S (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Irwin DE, Bensch S, Price TD (2001) Speciation in a ring. Nature 409:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Irwin DE, Bensch S, Irwin JH, Price TD (2005) Speciation by distance in a ring species. Science 307:414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimura M, Weiss GH (1964) The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49:561–576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS (2001) Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12089–12092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kopp M (2010) Speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. BioEssays 32:564–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leimar O, Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2008) Evolution of phenotypic clusters through competition and local adaptation along an environmental gradient. Evolution 62(4):807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mallet J (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Eco Evol 10:294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. May R (1975) In: Cody M, Diamond Belknap J (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayr E (1955) In: Arai R, Kato M, Doi Y (eds) Biodiversity and evolution. National Science Museum Foundation, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayr E (1988) Toward a new philosophy of biology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Melian CJ, Alonso D, Vázquez DP, Regetz J, Allesina S (2010) Frequency-dependent selection predicts patterns of radiations and biodiversity. PLoS Comp Biol 6:e1000892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melian CJ, Alonso D, Allesina S, Condit RS, Etienne RS (2012) Does sex speed up evolutionary rate and increase biodiversity? PLoS Comput Biol 8(3):e1002414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moran PAP (1958) Random processes in genetics. Proc Cam Phil Soc 54:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O'Dwyer JP, Green JL (2010) Field theory for biogeography: a spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13:87–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orr HA (1997) Haldane's rule. Annu Rev Ecol Svst 28:195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orr HA, Presgraves DC (2000) Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. BioEssays 22:1085–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parker GA, Partridge L (1998) Sexual confict and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinho C, Hey J (2010) Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Preston FW (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 42:611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenzweig M (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenzweig ML (1997) Tempo and mode of speciation. Science 277:1622–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosindell J, Phillimore AB (2011) A unified model of island biogeography sheds light on the zone of radiation. Ecol Lett 14:552–560. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01617.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosindell J, Cornell SJ, Hubbell SP, Etienne RS (2010) Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13:716–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosindell J, Hubbell SP, Etienne RS (2011) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol Evol 26:340–348. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sayama H, de Aguiar MAM, Bar-Yam Y, Baranger M (2002) Spontaneous pattern formulation and genetic invasion in locally mating and competing populations. Phys Rev E 65:051919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sugihara G (1980) Minimal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns. Am Nat 116:770–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Templeton A (1989) In: Otte D, Endler J (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  55. Ter Steege H (2010) How neutral is ecology? Biotropica 42:631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thornhill NW (1993) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  57. Tjorve E (2003) Shapes and functions of specie-area curves: a review of possible models. J Biogeogr 30:827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turelli M, Orr HA (2000) Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663–1679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright SJ (1940) Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am Nat 74:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright SJ (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth M. Baptestini
    • 1
  • Marcus A. M. de Aguiar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yaneer Bar-Yam
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de Física Gleb WataghinUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.New England Complex Systems InstituteCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations