Demographic heterogeneity impacts density-dependent population dynamics
- 304 Downloads
Among-individual variation in vital parameters such as birth and death rates that is unrelated to age, stage, sex, or environmental fluctuations is referred to as demographic heterogeneity. This kind of heterogeneity is prevalent in ecological populations, but is almost always left out of models. Demographic heterogeneity has been shown to affect demographic stochasticity in small populations and to increase growth rates for density-independent populations. The latter is due to “cohort selection,” where the most frail individuals die out first, lowering the cohort’s average mortality as it ages. The importance of cohort selection to population dynamics has only recently been recognized. We use a continuous-time model with density dependence, based on the logistic equation, to study the effects of demographic heterogeneity in mortality and reproduction. Reproductive heterogeneity is introduced in three ways: parent fertility, offspring viability, and parent–offspring correlation. We find that both the low-density growth rate and the equilibrium population size increase as the magnitude of mortality heterogeneity increases or as parent–offspring phenotypic correlation increases. Population dynamics are affected by complex interactions among the different types of heterogeneity, and trade-off scenarios are examined which can sometimes reverse the effect of increased heterogeneity. We show that there are a number of different homogeneous approximations to heterogeneous models, but all fail to capture important parts of the dynamics of the full model.
KeywordsDemographic heterogeneity Individual variation Frailty Cohort selection Logistic model
We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments which improved the manuscript. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 615024.
- Casellas J, Noguera JL, Varona L, Sánchez A, Arqué M, Piedrafita J (2004) Viability of Iberian × Meishan F2 newborn pigs. II. Survival analysis up to weaning. J Anim Sci 82(7):1925–1930. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/82/7/1925 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franklin AB, Anderson DR, Gutiérrez RJ, Burnham KP (2000) Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in Northern Spotted Owl populations in northwestern California. Ecol Monogr 70(4):539–590. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615%282000%29070%5B0539%3ACHQAFI%5D2.0.CO%3B2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerdes LU, Jeune B, Ranberg KA, Nybo H, Vaupel JW (2000) Estimation of apolipoprotein E genotype-specific relative mortality risks from the distribution of genotypes in centenarians and middle-aged men: Apolipoprotein E gene is a “frailty gene,” not a “longevity gene”. Genet Epidemiol 19(3):202–210. doi: 10.1002/1098-2272%28200010%2919%3A3%3C202%3AAID-GEPI2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kendall B, Fox G, Fujiwara M, Nogeire T (2011) Demographic heterogeneity, cohort selection, and population growth. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Manolis JC, Andersen DE, Cuthbert FJ (2002) Edge effect on nesting success of ground nesting birds near regenerating clearcuts in a forest-dominated landscape. Auk 119(4):955–970. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038%282002%29119%5B0955%3AEEONSO%5D2.0.CO%3B2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaupel JW, Yashin AI (1983) The deviant dynamics of death in heterogeneous populations. Research Reports RR-83-1, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar