Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 223–237 | Cite as

A patch-dynamic framework for food web metacommunities

Original paper

Abstract

The metacommunity concept has proved to be a valuable tool for studying how space can affect the properties and assembly of competitive communities. However, the concept has not been as extensively applied to the study of food webs or trophically structured communities. Here, we demonstrate how to develop a modelling framework that permits food webs to be considered from a spatial perspective. We do this by broadening the classic metapopulation patch-dynamic framework so that it can also account for trophic interactions between many species and patches. Unlike previous metacommunity models, we argue that this requires a system of equations to track the changing patch occupancy of the various species interactions, not the patch occupancy of individual species. We then suggest how this general theoretical framework can be used to study complex and spatially extended food web metacommunities.

Keywords

Food webs Metacommunities Trophic interactions Patch-dynamic models Metapopulation theory Predator–prey 

References

  1. Allesina S, Pascual M (2008) Network structure, predator–prey modules, and stability in large food webs. Theor Ecol 1:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amarasekare P (2008) Spatial dynamics of keystone predation. J Anim Ecol 77:1306–1315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bascompte J, Sole RV (1998) Effects of habitat destruction in a prey–predator metapopulation model. J Theor Biol 195:383–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brose U, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Eklof ABJ, Berg MP, Cousins SH, Mulder C, Verhoef HA, Wolters V (2005) Spatial aspects of food webs. In: de Ruiter P, Wolters V, Moore JC (eds) Dynamic food webs: multispecies assemblages, ecosystem development and environmental change. Academic, Burlington, pp 463–469Google Scholar
  5. Brose U, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2006) Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. Ecol Lett 9:1228–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Calcagno V, Mouquet N, Jarne P, David P (2006) Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition–colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol Lett 9:897–907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cottenie K, De Meester L (2003) Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 48:823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cottenie K, De Meester L (2004) Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 85:114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cottenie K, Michels E, Nuytten N, De Meester L (2003) Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowley PH (1979) Predator-mediated coexistence—equilibrium interpretation. J Theor Biol 80:129–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner MR, Ashby WR (1970) Connectance of large dynamic (Cybernetic) systems—critical values for stability. Nature 228:784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gouhier T, Guichard F, Gonzalez A (2010) Synchrony and stability of food webs in metacommunities. Am Nat (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Guichard F (2005) Interaction strength and extinction risk in a metacommunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1571–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastings A (1980) Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor Popul Biol 18:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holt RD (1997) Community modules. In: Gange AC, Brown VK (eds) Multitrophic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 333–349Google Scholar
  16. Holt RD (2002) Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecol Res 17:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) (2005) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383Google Scholar
  19. Keeling MJ (2002) Using individual-based simulations to test the Levins metapopulation paradigm. J Anim Ecol 71:270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kneitel JM, Miller TE (2003) Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Am Nat 162:165–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koelle K, Vandermeer J (2005) Dispersal-induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities. Ecol Lett 8:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawton JH, Warren PH (1988) Static and dynamic explanations for patterns in food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 3:242–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
  25. Levins R (1970) Complex systems. In: Waddington ECH (ed) Towards a theoretical biology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 73–88Google Scholar
  26. Levins R, Culver D (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species (mathematical model/habitable patches). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 68:1246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Loreau M, Downing A, Emmerson M, Gonzalez A, Hughes J, Inchausti P, Joshi J, Norberg J, Sala O (2002) A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 79–91Google Scholar
  28. Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12765–12770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. May RM (1972) Will a large complex system be stable. Nature 238:413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. May RM (1994) The effects of spatial scale on ecological questions and answers. In: Edwards PJ, May RM, Webb RN (eds) Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  32. May RM, Nowak MA (1994) Superinfection, metapopulation dynamics, and the evolution of diversity. J Theor Biol 170:95–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCann KS, Rasmussen JB, Umbanhowar J (2005) The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol Lett 8:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melian CJ, Bascompte J (2002) Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecol Lett 5:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michalski J, Arditi R (1995) Food-web structure at equilibrium and far from it—is it the same. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 259:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller TE, Kneitel JM, Burns JH (2002) Effect of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology 83:898–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Neutel AM, Heesterbeek JAP, van de Koppel J, Hoenderboom G, Vos A, Kaldeway C, Berendse F, de Ruiter PC (2007) Reconciling complexity with stability in naturally assembling food webs. Nature 449:599-U11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Otto SB, Rall BC, Brose U (2007) Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability. Nature 450:1226-U7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paine RT (1988) Food webs—road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development. Ecology 69:1648–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pimm SL, Lawton JH (1978) Feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275:542–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polis GA (1991) Complex trophic interactions in deserts— an empirical critique of food-web theory. Am Nat 138:123–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rooney N, McCann K, Gellner G, Moore JC (2006) Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature 442:265–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ryall KL, Fahrig L (2006) Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87:1086–1093CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schoenly K, Cohen JE (1991) Temporal variation in food web structure—16 empirical cases. Ecol Monogr 61:267–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Swihart RK, Feng ZL, Slade NA, Mason DM, Gehring TM (2001) Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator–prey metapopulation model. J Theor Biol 210:287–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Declerck S, Jeppesen E, Conde-Porcuna JM, Schwenk K, Zwart G, Degans H, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2007) The power of species sorting: local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20404–20409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. van Nouhuys S, Hanski I (2005) Metacommunities of butterflies, their host plants, and their parasitoids. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 99–121Google Scholar
  53. Vandermeer J (1973) Regional stabilization of locally unstable predator-prey relationships. J Theor Biol 41:161–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Warren PH (1989) Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of a fresh-water food web. Oikos 55:299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zeigler BP (1977) Persistence and patchiness of predator–prey systems induced by discrete event population exchange mechanisms. J Theor Biol 67:687–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradeep Pillai
    • 1
  • Michel Loreau
    • 1
  • Andrew Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations