Advertisement

Sommelier Students Display Superior Abilities to Identify but Not to Detect or Discriminate Odors Early in their Training

  • Daphnée PouponEmail author
  • Pauline Fernandez
  • Johannes Frasnelli
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Experts acquire superior abilities in their specific domains by training. Sommelier students, who are future olfaction experts, could be an excellent model to study the effects of olfactory training.

Methods

We tested whether sommelier students display superior olfactory abilities early in their education: within the first 2 months of education, we examined the olfactory function, i.e., discrimination and identification of odors as well as olfactory threshold and olfactory memory, of n = 25 sommelier students and compared them to n = 29 control students. We also tested episodic and working memory.

Results

We found that sommelier students outperformed controls in free and cued identification, but we did not observe any difference in discrimination or threshold tasks. There was also no difference in memory tasks.

Conclusions

Early in their education, sommelier students appear to be better at identifying odors, but do not display other superior olfactory abilities.

Implications

Results suggest that sommeliers are better at identifying odors than the average person, either because they enter into training with superior identifications skills or are able to learn to identify odors at a very fast rate.

Keywords

Olfaction Expertise Sommeliers Training Memory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank M. Daniel Vintrou for kindly enabling us to contact sommelier students from the Centre de Formation Professionnelle Bel-Avenir in Trois-Rivieres. This study was funded by the UQTR Research Chair in Chemosensory Neuroanatomy, the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (JF).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Quebec in Trois-Rivières, Canada.

Informed Consent

All participants gave informed written consent to participate.

References

  1. Altundag A, Cayonu M, Kayabasoglu G, Salihoglu M, Tekeli H, Saglam O, Hummel T (2015) Modified olfactory training in patients with postinfectious olfactory loss. Laryngoscope 125(8):1763–1766.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks SJ, Sreenivasan KR, Weintraub DM, Baldock D, Noback M, Pierce ME, Frasnelli J, James J, Beall E, Zhuang X, Cordes D, Leger GC (2016) Structural and functional MRI differences in master sommeliers: a pilot study on expertise in the brain. Front Hum Neurosci 10:414.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bende M, Nordin S (1997) Perceptual learning in olfaction: professional wine tasters versus controls. Physiol Behav 62(5):1065–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen JD, Forman SD, Braver TS, Casey BJ, Servan-Schreiber D, Noll DC (1994) Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 1(4):293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.460010407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corkin S, Amaral DG, Gonzalez RG, Johnson KA, Hyman BT (1997) HM’s medial temporal lobe lesion: findings from magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 17(10):3964–3979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croy I, Olgun S, Mueller L, Schmidt A, Muench M, Hummel C, Gisselmann G, Hatt H, Hummel T (2015) Peripheral adaptive filtering in human olfaction? Three studies on prevalence and effects of olfactory training in specific anosmia in more than 1600 participants. Cortex 73:180–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PA (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci 5(3):199–200.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damm M, Pikart LK, Reimann H, Burkert S, Goktas O, Haxel B, Frey S, Charalampakis I, Beule A, Renner B, Hummel T, Huttenbrink KB (2014) Olfactory training is helpful in postinfectious olfactory loss: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Laryngoscope 124(4):826–831.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delon-Martin C, Plailly J, Fonlupt P, Veyrac A, Royet JP (2013) Perfumers’ expertise induces structural reorganization in olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage 68:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dileo MD, Amedee RG (1994) Disorders of taste and smell. J La State Med Soc 146(10):433–437Google Scholar
  11. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A (2004) Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427(6972):311–312.  https://doi.org/10.1038/427311a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Driemeyer J, Boyke J, Gaser C, Buchel C, May A (2008) Changes in gray matter induced by learning--revisited. PLoS One 3(7):e2669.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C (2007) The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:123–152.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleiner F, Lau L, Goktas O (2012) Active olfactory training for the treatment of smelling disorders. Ear Nose Throat J 91(5):198–203 215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frasnelli J, Lundstrom JN, Boyle JA, Djordjevic J, Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M (2010) Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance. Exp Brain Res 201(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1999-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geissler K, Reimann H, Gudziol H, Bitter T, Guntinas-Lichius O (2014) Olfactory training for patients with olfactory loss after upper respiratory tract infections. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(6):1557–1562.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2747-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haehner A, Tosch C, Wolz M, Klingelhoefer L, Fauser M, Storch A, Reichmann H, Hummel T (2013) Olfactory training in patients with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 8(4):e61680.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hedner M, Larsson M, Arnold N, Zucco GM, Hummel T (2010) Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 32(10):1062–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803391003683070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(3):237–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB (2009) Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope 119(3):496–499.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kollndorfer K, Kowalczyk K, Hoche E, Mueller CA, Pollak M, Trattnig S, Schopf V (2014) Recovery of olfactory function induces neuroplasticity effects in patients with smell loss. Neural Plast 2014:140419–140417.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/140419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kollndorfer K, Fischmeister FP, Kowalczyk K, Hoche E, Mueller CA, Trattnig S, Schopf V (2015) Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss. Neuroimage Clin 9:401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Konstantinidis I, Tsakiropoulou E, Bekiaridou P, Kazantzidou C, Constantinidis J (2013) Use of olfactory training in post-traumatic and postinfectious olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 123(12):E85–E90.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livermore A, Hummel T (2004) The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem Senses 29(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacMillan N, Creelman C (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  27. Majid A, Speed L, Croijmans I, Arshamian A (2017) What makes a better smeller? Perception 46(3–4):406–430.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616688224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moller R, Pause BM, Ferstl R (1999) Inducibility of olfactory sensitivity by odor exposure of persons with specific anosmia. Z Exp Psychol 46(1):53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Negoias S, Friedrich H, Caversaccio MD, Landis BN (2016) Rapidly fluctuating anosmia: a clinical sign for unilateral smell impairment. Laryngoscope 126(2):E57–E59.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parr WV, Heatherbell D, White KG (2002) Demystifying wine expertise: olfactory threshold, perceptual skill and semantic memory in expert and novice wine judges. Chem Senses 27(8):747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parr WV, Mouret M, Blackmore S, Pelquest-Hunt T, Urdapilleta I (2011) Representation of complexity in wine: influence of expertise. Food Qual Prefer 22(7):647–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pazart L, Comte A, Magnin E, Millot JL, Moulin T (2014) An fMRI study on the influence of sommeliers’ expertise on the integration of flavor. Front Behav Neurosci 8:358.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pekala K, Chandra RK, Turner JH (2016) Efficacy of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(3):299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Plailly J, Delon-Martin C, Royet JP (2012) Experience induces functional reorganization in brain regions involved in odor imagery in perfumers. Hum Brain Mapp 33(1):224–234.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poupon D, Hummel T, Haehner A, Welge-Luessen A, Frasnelli J (2017) Nostril differences in the olfactory performance in health and disease. Chem Senses 42(8):625–634.  https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabin MD, Cain WS (1986) Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity. Percept Psychophys 39(4):281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rey A (1958) L’examen clinique en psychologie. Press Universitaire de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Royet JP, Plailly J, Saive AL, Veyrac A, Delon-Martin C (2013) The impact of expertise in olfaction. Front Psychol 4:928.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sreenivasan K, Zhuang X, Banks SJ, Mishra V, Yang Z, Deshpande G, Cordes D (2017) Olfactory network differences in master sommeliers: connectivity analysis using granger causality and graph theoretical approach. Brain Connect 7(2):123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2016.0458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang L, Chen L, Jacob T (2004) Evidence for peripheral plasticity in human odour response. J Physiol 554(Pt 1):236–244.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daphnée Poupon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pauline Fernandez
    • 2
  • Johannes Frasnelli
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresQCCanada
  2. 2.Institut du Tourisme et d’Hôtellerie du QuébecMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Research CentreSacré Coeur HospitalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations