Advertisement

Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 10, Issue 1–2, pp 23–30 | Cite as

Personality and Perceptions of Common Odors

  • Daniel Shepherd
  • Michael J. Hautus
  • Poutasi W. B. Urale
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Common brain areas play a role in processing both personality and odor, while personality theory predicts that olfactory performance should vary according to personality traits. The Big Five model of personality is considered a gold standard measure but has yet to be directly applied in investigations linking personality and olfactory responses. Moreover, olfactory measures commonly used in personality studies are usually rudimentary sensory performance indices such as thresholds as opposed to higher-order perceptual and psychological metrics.

Methods

This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between comprehensive measures of personality and perceptual responses to odors. Personality was measured using a comprehensive test of the Big Five model of personality, while olfactory responses included identification, pleasantness, perceived intensity, and familiarity. Odors were presented using the Sniffin’ Sticks test.

Results

Small to moderate correlations were noted between aspects of personality and response to odor, even after controlling for participant (N = 74) characteristics such as age and gender. Regression analyses indicated that, overall, odor familiarity co-varies the most with aspects of personality.

Conclusions and Implications

Responses to olfactory stimuli are moderated by specific personality dimensions. This finding is consistent with approach and avoidance motivational models of personality.

Keywords

Olfaction Personality Big Five Sensory perception 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Sources of Funding

No external funding was obtained for the research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The procedures used in this study were approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee before data collection began. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. Atanasova B, Graux J, El Hage W, Hommet C, Camus V, Belzung C (2008) Olfaction: a potential cognitive marker of psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1315–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barresi M, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, Cuzzola V, Celi D, Bramanti P, Marino S (2012) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci 323:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechara A, Damazio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair KS, Newman C, Mitchell DGV, Richell RA, Leonard A, Morton J, Blair RJR (2006) Differentiating among prefrontal substrates in psychopathy: neuropsychological test findings. Neuropsychology 20:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2000) Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 37(2):204–215Google Scholar
  6. Brocke B, Beauducel A, Tasche KG (1999) Biopsychological bases and behavioural correlates of sensation seeking: contributions to a multilevel validation. Personal Individ Differ 26:1103–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burón E, Bulbena A, Bulbena-Cabré A (2015) Olfactory functioning in panic disorder. J Affect Disord 175:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen D, Dalton P (2005) The effect of emotion and personality on olfactory perception. Chem Senses 30:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) NEO PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FLGoogle Scholar
  10. Croy I, Springborn M, Loetsch J, Johnston ANB, Hummel T (2011) Agreeable smellers and sensitive neurotics correlations among personality traits and sensory thresholds. PLoS One 6:e18701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martinez-Gomez M, Schicker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R (1999) Perception of everyday odours—correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses 24:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot AJ, Thrash TM (2002) Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:804–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eysenck HJ (1967) The biological basis of personality. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  14. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck MW (1985) Personality and individual differences. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filsinger EE, Fabes RA, Hughston G (1987) Introversion-extroversion and dimensions of olfactory perception. Percept Motor Skills 64:695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrikson M, Georgiades A (1992) personality dimensions and classical conditioning of autonomic nervous system reactions 13:1013–1020Google Scholar
  17. Herbener ES, Kagan J, Cohen M (1989) Shyness and olfactory threshold. Personal Individ Differ 10:1159–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) Sniffin’ sticks: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–226Google Scholar
  19. Koelega HS (1994) Sex differences in olfactory sensitivity and the problem of the generality of smell acuity. Percept Mot Skills 78:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koenig J, Gillie B, Bernardi A, Williams D, Hillecke T, Thayer J (2015) Neuroticism influences affective but not sensory ratings of experimentally induced pain. Presented at the 34th annual scientific meeting of the American pain society, Columbus, OH. http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(15)00114-5/fulltext. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.076
  21. Larsson M, Finkel D, Pedersen NL (2000) Odor identification: influences of age, gender, cognition, and personality. J Gerontol 55:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ledoux J (2003) The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell Mol Neurobiol 23:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee IH, Cheng CC, Yang YK, Yeh TL, Chen PS, Chiu NT (2005) Correlation between striatal dopamine D2 receptor density and neuroticism in community volunteers. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 138:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehrner J, Kirchebner J, Auff E, Pusswald G (2015) Higher level of neuroticism in patients with problems with the sense of smell. Wien Klin Wochenschr (The Central European Journal of Medicine) 127:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahmut MK, Stevenson RJ (2012) Olfactory abilities and psychopathy: higher psychopathy scores are associated with poorer odor discrimination and identification. Chemical. Perception 5:300–307Google Scholar
  26. Martzke JS, Kopala LC, Good KP (1997) Olfactory dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders: review and methodological considerations. Biol Psychiatry 42:721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pause BA, Ferstl R, Fehm-Wolfsdorf G (1998) Personality and olfactory sensitivity. J Res Pers 32:510–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with the Bonferroni adjustments. Br Med Bull 316:1236–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepherd D, Hautus MJ (2015) The feasibility of gelatin-based retronasal stimuli to assess olfactory perception. Sage Open. doi: 10.1177/2158244015610173
  30. Shepherd D, Heinonen-Guzejevb M, Hautus MJ, Heikkiläb K (2015) Elucidating the relationship between noise sensitivity and personality. Noise and Health 17:54–59Google Scholar
  31. Soudry Y, Lemognea C, Malinvaud D, Consoli SM, Bonfils P (2011) Olfactory system and emotion: common substrates. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spinella M (2002) A relationship between smell identification and empathy. Int J Neurosci 112(6):605–612Google Scholar
  33. Stelmack R, Rammsayer T (2008) Psychophysiological and biochemical correlates of personality. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH (eds) The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol 1: personality theories and models. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  34. Stenberg G (1992) Personality and the EEG: arousal and emotional arousability. Personal Individ Differ 13:1097–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strelau J (1987) Personality dimensions based on arousal theories. In: Personality in dimensions and arousal edited by Jan Strelau, Michael EysenckGoogle Scholar
  36. Thayer JF, Lane RD (2009) Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zangwill N (2014) Aesthetic judgment. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2014 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/aesthetic-judgment

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Shepherd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michael J. Hautus
    • 2
  • Poutasi W. B. Urale
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public HealthAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations