Personality and Perceptions of Common Odors
Common brain areas play a role in processing both personality and odor, while personality theory predicts that olfactory performance should vary according to personality traits. The Big Five model of personality is considered a gold standard measure but has yet to be directly applied in investigations linking personality and olfactory responses. Moreover, olfactory measures commonly used in personality studies are usually rudimentary sensory performance indices such as thresholds as opposed to higher-order perceptual and psychological metrics.
This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between comprehensive measures of personality and perceptual responses to odors. Personality was measured using a comprehensive test of the Big Five model of personality, while olfactory responses included identification, pleasantness, perceived intensity, and familiarity. Odors were presented using the Sniffin’ Sticks test.
Small to moderate correlations were noted between aspects of personality and response to odor, even after controlling for participant (N = 74) characteristics such as age and gender. Regression analyses indicated that, overall, odor familiarity co-varies the most with aspects of personality.
Conclusions and Implications
Responses to olfactory stimuli are moderated by specific personality dimensions. This finding is consistent with approach and avoidance motivational models of personality.
KeywordsOlfaction Personality Big Five Sensory perception
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Sources of Funding
No external funding was obtained for the research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The procedures used in this study were approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee before data collection began. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2000) Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 37(2):204–215Google Scholar
- Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) NEO PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FLGoogle Scholar
- Eysenck HJ (1967) The biological basis of personality. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
- Fredrikson M, Georgiades A (1992) personality dimensions and classical conditioning of autonomic nervous system reactions 13:1013–1020Google Scholar
- Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) Sniffin’ sticks: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–226Google Scholar
- Koenig J, Gillie B, Bernardi A, Williams D, Hillecke T, Thayer J (2015) Neuroticism influences affective but not sensory ratings of experimentally induced pain. Presented at the 34th annual scientific meeting of the American pain society, Columbus, OH. http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(15)00114-5/fulltext. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.076
- Mahmut MK, Stevenson RJ (2012) Olfactory abilities and psychopathy: higher psychopathy scores are associated with poorer odor discrimination and identification. Chemical. Perception 5:300–307Google Scholar
- Shepherd D, Hautus MJ (2015) The feasibility of gelatin-based retronasal stimuli to assess olfactory perception. Sage Open. doi: 10.1177/2158244015610173
- Shepherd D, Heinonen-Guzejevb M, Hautus MJ, Heikkiläb K (2015) Elucidating the relationship between noise sensitivity and personality. Noise and Health 17:54–59Google Scholar
- Spinella M (2002) A relationship between smell identification and empathy. Int J Neurosci 112(6):605–612Google Scholar
- Stelmack R, Rammsayer T (2008) Psychophysiological and biochemical correlates of personality. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH (eds) The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol 1: personality theories and models. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Strelau J (1987) Personality dimensions based on arousal theories. In: Personality in dimensions and arousal edited by Jan Strelau, Michael EysenckGoogle Scholar
- Zangwill N (2014) Aesthetic judgment. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2014 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/aesthetic-judgment