Advertisement

Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Proustian Products are Preferred: The Relationship Between Odor-Evoked Memory and Product Evaluation

  • Haruko Sugiyama
  • Akiko Oshida
  • Paula Thueneman
  • Susan Littell
  • Atsushi Katayama
  • Mitsuyoshi Kashiwagi
  • Satoshi Hikichi
  • Rachel S. Herz
Article

Abstract

Introduction

The Proustian memory effect—that fragrances elicit more emotional and evocative memories than other memory cues—is well established. Fragrances also potentiate a variety of psychological states from moods to motivated behavior. Consumer research has shown that pleasant, product-congruent scents enhance product appeal, that products with greater emotional and cognitive involvement are perceived more positively, and that scent can increase recall for product information. However, the effect of Proustian memories on product perception has never been examined. The aim of the present study was to address this issue.

Methods

An extensive pilot test in which the methods for the main experiment were established was first conducted. The main experiment then tested how a product (body lotion) that varied in fragrance pleasantness and Proustian memory potency was perceived.

Results

Data analyses from a nationwide study showed that if the lotion fragrance was perceived as very pleasant, and it evoked potent personal emotional memories, that lotion was liked better and judged to be superior on a variety of functional and emotional attributes than the same lotion whose scent was perceived as equally pleasant but was not experienced as evocative.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that it is the personal potency of Proustian memories evoked by a product’s fragrance, more than the hedonic qualities of the scent per se, that drives product perception and has important implications for the development of scented products.

Keywords

Proustian memory Odor Pleasantness Consumer preferences Scented products 

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Conflict of Interest

Rachel Herz has received research grants from Kao Corporation. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Alba JW, Huchinson JW, Lynch JG (1991) Memory and decision making. In: Roberston TS, Kassarjian HH (eds) Handbook of consumer behavior. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  2. Arshamian A, Iannilli E, Gerber JC, Willander J, Persson J, Seo H, & … Larsson M (2013) The functional neuroanatomy of odor-evoked autobiographical memories cued by odors and words. Neuropsychologia 51:123–131Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner H, Sujan M, Bettman JR (1992) Autobiographical memories, affect, and consumer information processing. J Consum Psychol 1:53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cahill L, Babinsky R, Markowitsch HJ, McGaugh JL (1995) The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature 377:295–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chebat JC, Michon R (2003) Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers’ emotions, cognition, and spending: a test of competitive causal theories. J Bus Res 56:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen D, Dalton P (2005) The effect of emotion and personality on olfactory perception. Chem Senses 30:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu S, Downes JJ (2000) Odour-evoked autobiographical memories: psychological investigations of Proustian phenomena. Chem Senses 25:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb-Walgren CJ, Ruble CA, Donthu N (1995) Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. J Advert 24:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Houwer J, Thomas S, Baeyens F (2001) Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychol Bull 127:853–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martínez-Gómez M, Schicker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R (1999) Perception of everyday odors—correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses 24:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doty RL, Cameron EL (2009) Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol Behav 97:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L (1984) Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science 226:1441–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doucé L, Poels K, Janssens W, De Backer C (2013) Smelling the books: the effect of chocolate scent on purchase-related behavior in a bookstore. J Environ Psychol 36:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eichenbaum H (2001) The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav Brain Res 127:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engen T (1988) The acquisition of odor hedonics. In: van Toller S, Dodd GH (eds) Perfumery: the psychology and biology of fragrance. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Epple G, Herz RS (1999) Ambient odors associated to failure influence cognitive performance in children. Dev Psychobiol 35:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiore AM, Yah X, Yoh E (2000) Effects of product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences. Psychol Mark 17:27–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herz RS (1998) Are odors the best cues to memory? A cross-modal comparison of associative memory stimuli. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855:670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herz RS (2004) A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory, visual and auditory stimuli. Chem Senses 29:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herz RS (2009) Aromatherapy facts and fictions: a scientific analysis of olfactory effects on mood, physiology and behavior. Int J Neurosci 119:263–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herz RS (2012) Odor memory and the special role of associative learning. In: Zucco GM, Herz RS, Schall B (eds) Olfactory cognition: from perception and memory to environmental odours and neuroscience. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herz RS, Cupchik GC (1992) An experimental characterization of odor-evoked memories in humans. Chem Senses 17:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herz RS, Engen T (1996) Odor memory: review and analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 3:300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herz RS, Beland SL, Hellerstein M (2004a) Changing odor hedonic perception through emotional associations in humans. Int J Comp Psychol 17:315–339Google Scholar
  25. Herz RS, Eliassen JC, Beland SL, Souza T (2004b) Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory. Neuropsychologia 42:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herz RS, Schankler C, Beland S (2004c) Olfaction, emotion and associative learning: effects on motivated behavior. Motiv Emot 28:363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann W, De Houwer J, Perugini M, Baeyens F, Crombez G (2010) Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 136:390–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keller KL (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark 57:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna A, Lwin MO, Morrin M (2010) Product scent and memory. J Consum Res 37:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuroda K, Inoue N, Ito Y, Kubota K, Sugimoto A, Kakuda T et al (2005) Sedative effects of the jasmine tea odor and (R)-(−) linalool one of its major odor components, on autonomic nerve activity and mood states. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsson M, Willander J (2009) Autobiographical odor memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170:318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehrner J, Marwinski G, Lehr S, Johren P, Deecke L (2005) Ambient odors of orange and lavender reduce anxiety and improve mood in a dental office. Physiol Behav 86:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mattila AS, Wirtz J (2001) Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior. J Retail 77:273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Proust M (1928) Swann’s way. Modern Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Raudenbush B, Corley N, Eppich W (2001) Enhancing athletic performance through the administration of peppermint odor. J Sports Exerc Psychol 23:156–160Google Scholar
  36. Raudenbush B, Grayhem R, Sears T, Wilson I (2009) Effects of peppermint and cinnamon odor administration on simulated driving alertness, mood and workload. N Am J Psychol 11:245–256Google Scholar
  37. Rubin DC, Groth E, Goldsmith DJ (1984) Olfactory cuing of autobiographical memory. Am J Psychol 97:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spangenberg ER, Sprott DE, Grohmann B, Tracy DL (2006) Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviors in a retail store. J Bus Res 59:1281–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stuart EW, Shimp TA, Engle RW (1987) Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes: four experiments in an advertising context. J Consum Res 14:334–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Till BD (1998) Using celebrity endorsers effectively: lessons from associative learning. J Prod Brand Manag 7:400–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Willander J, Larsson M (2006) Smell your way back to childhood: autobiographical odor memory. Psychon Bull Rev 13:240–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson DA, Stevenson RJ (2006) Learning to smell: olfactory perception from neurobiology to behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeshurun Y, Lapid H, Dudai Y, Sobel N (2009) The privileged brain representation of first olfactory associations. Curr Biol 19:1869–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zucco GM (2007) Odor memory: the unique nature of a memory system. In: Plümacher M, Holz P (eds) Speaking of colors and odors. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zucco GM (2012) The acquisition of odour preference via evaluative olfactory conditioning: historical background and state of the art. In: Zucco GM, Herz RS, Schall B (eds) Olfactory cognition: from perception and memory to environmental odours and neuroscience. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zucco GM, Aiello L, Turuani L, Köster E (2012) Odor-evoked autobiographical memories: age and gender differences along the life span. Chem Senses 37:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haruko Sugiyama
    • 1
  • Akiko Oshida
    • 1
  • Paula Thueneman
    • 2
  • Susan Littell
    • 2
  • Atsushi Katayama
    • 3
  • Mitsuyoshi Kashiwagi
    • 3
  • Satoshi Hikichi
    • 4
  • Rachel S. Herz
    • 5
  1. 1.Kansei Science ResearchKao CorporationTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Kao USA Inc.CincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Perfumery Development ResearchKao CorporationTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Kao CorporationTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Psychiatry and Human BehaviorBrown University Medical SchoolProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations