Sodium Chloride Suppresses Vegetable Bitterness Only When Plain Vegetables Are Perceived as Highly Bitter
- 326 Downloads
The efficacy of sodium salts as bitterness suppressors is highly variable depending on the tastants used, and few studies have investigated whether salt can mask the bitterness of nutritious vegetables. We compared how sodium chloride (NaCl) affected bitterness ratings of vegetables and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). In Experiment 1, Brussels sprouts and cauliflower were rated plain and with the addition of NaCl on hedonic and sensory attributes. In Experiment 2, multiple concentrations of NaCl were given on the vegetables, and participants tasted QHCl plain and with the addition of NaCl. In both experiments, reported bitterness and liking of the vegetables did not change with the addition of NaCl; all p values > 0.3. Hierarchical linear regression modeling revealed that NaCl decreased the bitterness ratings of the vegetables most for participants who perceived the plain vegetables as highly bitter, R 2 = 0.211, and increased hedonic ratings of the vegetables most for participants who disliked the plain vegetables, R 2 = 0.243. The addition of NaCl to QHCl significantly reduced bitterness ratings, p < 0.001, especially for participants who found the plain QHCl highly bitter, R 2 = 0.339. Sodium chloride suppressed bitterness and increased liking for participants who disliked plain vegetables and tasted them as highly bitter. These results suggest that NaCl would be efficacious as a bitterness masking agent for people particularly vulnerable to vegetable underconsumption. Furthermore, NaCl might interact fundamentally differently with a full food matrix than it does with QHCl, limiting the generalizeability of chemical suppression studies.
KeywordsBitterness suppression Salt Sodium chloride Individual differences Quinine hydrochloride
Analysis of variance
Body mass index
Generalized labeled magnitude scale
Recommended daily allowance
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
Conflict of Interest
Lynn M. Wilkie declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Elizabeth D. Capaldi Phillips declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Devina Wadhera declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Beauchamp GK, Bertino M, Burke D, Engelman K (1990) Experimental sodium depletion and salt taste in normal human volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 51:881–889Google Scholar
- Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K (1982) Long-term reduction in dietary sodium alters the taste of salt. Am J Clin Nutr 36:1134–1144Google Scholar
- Chang VC, Mark GP, Hernandez L, Hoebel BG (1988) Extracellular dopamine increases in the nucleus accumbens following rehydration or sodium repletion in rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 14:527Google Scholar
- Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 72:1424–1435Google Scholar
- Gravina SA, McGregor RA, Nossoughi R, Kherlopian J, Hofmann T (2003). Biomimetic in vitro assay for the characterization of bitter tastants and identification of bitter taste blockers. In: ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES (vol. 867, pp 91–103). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC; 1999Google Scholar
- Keast RSJ, Breslin PAS, Beauchamp GK (2001) Suppression of bitterness using sodium salts. ChiMA Int J Chem 55(5):441–447Google Scholar
- Lewin L (1894) Ueber die Geschmacksverbesserung von Medicamenten und über Saturationen. Berl Klin Wochenschr 28:644–645Google Scholar
- Miller IJ (1991) Taste perception, taste bud distribution and spatial relationships. Smell and taste in health and disease. New York, NY: Raven Press; 205–233Google Scholar
- Murphy MM, Barraj LM, Herman D, Bi X, Cheatham R, Randolph RK (2011) Phytonutrient intake by adults in the United States in relation to fruit and vegetable consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 112(2):222–229Google Scholar
- Snyder DJ, Puentes LA, Sims CA, Bartoshuk LM (2008) Building a better intensity scale: which labels are essential? Chem Senses 33(8):S142Google Scholar
- van Duijnhoven FJ, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Ferrari P, Jenab M, Boshuizen HC, Ros MM, Casagrande C, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Flavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Morois S, Kaaks R, Linseisen J, Boeing H, Nothlings U, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Misirli G, Palli D, Sieri S, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Peeters PHM, van Gils CG, Ocke MC, Lund E, Engeset D, Skeie G, Rodriguez-Suarez L, Gonzalez CA, Sanchez M-J, Dorronsoro M, Navarro C, Barricarte A, Berglund G, Manjer J, Hallamans G, Palmqvist R, Bingham SA, Khaw K-T, Key TJ, Allen NE, Boffetta P, Slimani N, Rinaldi S, Gallo V, Norat T, Riboli E (2009) Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 89(5):1441–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yokomukai Y, Breslin PAS, Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK (1994) Sensitivity to the bitterness of iso-α-acids: the effects of age and interactions with NaCl. Chem Senses 19:577Google Scholar