Advertisement

Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 94–107 | Cite as

Gustatory, Olfactory and Trigeminal Interactions in a Model Carbonated Beverage

  • L. HewsonEmail author
  • T. Hollowood
  • S. Chandra
  • J. Hort
Article

Abstract

Flavour results from the integration of aroma, taste and chemosensory information within the brain. Understanding interactions between the anatomically separate systems which relay this information is crucial to our appreciation of how different aspects of food contribute to flavour perception and the formulation of successful products. To examine these interactions, a beverage system was created containing elements capable of stimulating gustatory, olfactory and trigeminal systems. Using ingredients relevant to commercial beverages, water, aroma volatiles, tastants and carbonation, enabled examination of the effects of tastant–aroma–carbonation interactions on sensory perception. Samples, selected according to D-optimal designs, were evaluated by a trained panel. Predictive polynomial models were generated from mean panel data to explain variations in the attributes as a function of design factors. Increasing both sugars and acids resulted in increases in perceived flavour. Evidence of differential flavour enhancement profiles of two sugars at perceptually equi-sweet levels, glucose and fructose, supported previous findings in a non-carbonated system (Hewson et al., Food Qual Prefer 19:323–334, 2008). This difference was also evident in models generated for some mouthfeel attributes (tingling and irritant attributes). Carbonation increased sourness, in agreement with previous literature (McLellan et al., J Food Sci 49:1595–1597, 1984; Yau and McDaniel, J Food Sci 57:1412–1416, 1992), but also suppressed sweetness. Interestingly, evaluation of beverages revealed the perception of a bitter aftertaste, which was primarily driven by CO2 level, enhanced by citric acid, and suppressed by increasing sugar concentration. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the sensory profile of a model carbonated beverage. Analysis provided novel evidence of the influence of multimodal interactions from gustatory, olfactory and trigeminal origin on sensory perception and highlighted the differential effects of two monosaccharides on key sensory attributes.

Keywords

Multimodal Interactions Carbonation Glucose Fructose Trigeminal System 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with financial support from BBSRC and GSK.

References

  1. Bouvet JF, Delaleu JC, Holley A (1987) Olfactory receptor cell-function is affected by trigeminal nerve activity. Neurosci Lett 77:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brand G (2006) Olfactory/trigeminal interactions in nasal chemoreception. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:908–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M (1999) Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. Br Med J 319:1393–1397Google Scholar
  4. Carstens E, Carstens MI, Dessirier JM, O'Mahony M, Simons CT, Sudo M, Sudo S (2002) It hurts so good: oral irritation by spices and carbonated drinks and the underlying neural mechanisms. Food Qual Prefer 13:431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comettomuniz JE, Garciamedina MR, Calvino AM, Noriega G (1987) Interactions between Co2 oral pungency and taste. Perception 16:629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowart BJ (1998) The addition of CO2 to traditional taste solutions alters taste quality. Chem Senses 23:397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delwiche J (2004) The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Qual Prefer 15:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dessirier JM, O'Mahony M, Iodi-Carstens M, Carstens E (2000a) Sensory properties of citric acid: psychophysical evidence for sensitization, self-desensitization, cross-desensitization and cross-stimulus-induced recovery following capsaicin. Chem Senses 25:769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dessirier JM, Simons CT, Carstens MI, O'Mahony M, Carstens E (2000b) Psychophysical and neurobiological evidence that the oral sensation elicited by carbonated water is of chemogenic origin. Chem Senses 25:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eylam S, Kennedy LM (1998) Identification and characterization of human fructose or glucose taste variants with hypogeusia for one monosaccharide but not for the other. In "Olfaction and Taste Xii" vol. 855, pp 170–174Google Scholar
  11. Eylam S, Kennedy LM, Stevens DA (1995) Potential human variants for glucose taste suggest separate fructose and glucose mechanisms. Chem Senses 20:77–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank RA, Byram J (1988) Taste smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses 13:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilmore MM, Green BG (1993) Sensory irritation and taste produced by nacl and citric-acid—effects of capsaicin desensitization. Chem Senses 18:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green BG (1996) Chemesthesis: pungency as a component of flavor. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green BG, Alvarez-Reeves M, George P, Akirav C (2005) Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity. Physiol Behav 86:526–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harper SJ, McDaniel MR (1993) Carbonated water lexicon—temperature and Co2 level influence on descriptive ratings. J Food Sci 58:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewson L, Hollowood T, Chandra S, Hort J (2008) Taste-aroma interactions in a citrus flavoured model beverage system: similarities and differences between acid and sugar type. Food Qual Prefer 19:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hummel T, Livermore A (2002) Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International, Z. (2007). The 2007 Soft Drinks ReportGoogle Scholar
  20. Isik U, Ozek E, Bilgen H, Cebeci D (2000) Comparison of oral glucose and sucrose solutions on pain response in neonates. J Pain 1:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kallithraka S, Bakker J, Clifford MN (1997) Effect of pH on astringency in model solutions and wines. J Agric Food Chem 45:2211–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kappes SM, Schmidt SI, Lee SY (2006a) Descriptive analysis of cola and lemon/lime carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 71:S583–S589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee SY (2006b) Mouthfeel detection threshold and instrumental viscosity of sucrose and high fructose corn syrup solutions. J Food Sci 71:S597–S602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee SY (2007) Relationship between physical properties and sensory attributes of carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 72:S1–S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keast SJR, Breslin PAS (2003) An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Qual Prefer 14:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King BM, Arents P, Bouter N, Duineveld CAA, Meyners M, Schroff SI, Soekhai ST (2006) Sweetener/sweetness-induced changes in flavor perception and flavor release of fruity and green character in beverages. J Agric Food Chem 54:2671–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kracke GR, Uthoff KA, Tobias JD (2005) Sugar solution analgesia: the effects of glucose on expressed mu opioid receptors. Anesth Analg 101:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawless HT, Clark CC (1992) Psychological biases in time-intensity scaling. Food Technol 46:81Google Scholar
  29. Lawless HT, Horne J, Giasi P (1996) Astringency of organic acids is related to pH. Chem Senses 21:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lederer, C. L., Bodyfelt, F. W., and McDaniel, M. R. (1991). The Effect of Carbonation Level on the Sensory Properties of Flavored Milk Beverages 74, 2100-2108Google Scholar
  31. McEvoy. (1998). Sensory evaluation of carbonated beverages utilizing a hyperbaric chamber or what would soda taste like if you could get inside the can? In:Chemical senses day XIV abstracts. Santa Rosa, CA. Chemical senses Google Scholar
  32. McLellan MR, Barnard J, Queale DT (1984) Sensory analysis of carbonated apple juice using response-surface methodology. J Food Sci 49:1595–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nahon DF, Roozen JP, DeGraaf C (1996) Sweetness flavour interactions in soft drinks. Food Chem 56:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble AC (1996) Taste-aroma interactions. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Odake S (2001) Sweetness intensity in low-carbonated beverages. Biomolecular Engineering 17:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pangborn RM (1960) Taste interrelationships. Food Research 25:245–256Google Scholar
  37. Pangborn RM (1961) Taste interrelationships. 2. Suprathreshold solutions of sucrose and citric acid. J Food Sci 26:648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prescott J, Soo J, Campbell H, Robells C (2004) Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages. Physiol Behav 82:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prescott J, Stevenson RJ (1995a) Effects of oral pungency on tastes and flavors in mixtures. Chem Senses 20:87–87Google Scholar
  40. Prescott J, Stevenson RJ (1995b) Pungency in food perception and preference. Food Rev Int 11:665–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramenghi LA, Evans DJ, Levene MI (1999) "Sucrose analgesia": absorptive mechanism or taste perception? Arch Dis Child 80:F146–F147Google Scholar
  42. Savant L, McDaniel MR (2004) Suppression of sourness: a comparative study involving mixtures of organic acids and sugars. Percept Psychophys 66:642–650Google Scholar
  43. Schifferstein HNJ (1995) Role of congruency in odor–taste interactions. Appetite 24:299–299Google Scholar
  44. Schifferstein HNJ, Frijters JER (1991) The effectiveness of different sweeteners in suppressing citric-acid sourness. Percept Psychophys 49:1–9Google Scholar
  45. Shann F (2007) Suckling and sugar reduce pain in babies. Lancet 369:721–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simons CT, Boucher Y, Carstens E (2003) Suppression of central taste transmission by oral capsaicin. J Neurosci 23:978–985Google Scholar
  47. Simons CT, Dessirier JM, Carstens MI, O'Mahony M, Carstens E (1999) Neurobiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying the oral sensation produced by carbonated water. J Neurosci 19:8134–8144Google Scholar
  48. Verhagen JV, Engelen L (2006) The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: sensory integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:613–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walters DE, Roy G (1996) Taste interactions of sweet and bitter compounds. In "Flavor–Food Interactions", Vol. 633, pp 130–142Google Scholar
  50. Yau NJN, McDaniel MR (1992) Carbonation interactions with sweetness and sourness. J Food Sci 57:1412–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yau NJN, McDaniel MR, Bodyfelt FW (1989) Sensory Evaluation of Sweetened Flavored Carbonated Milk Beverages. J Dairy Sci 72:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food SciencesUniversity of NottinghamLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Sensory DimensionsNottinghamUK
  3. 3.Glaxo SmithKlineColefordUK

Personalised recommendations