Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Effect of Pulsed or Continuous Delivery of Salt on Sensory Perception Over Short Time Intervals

  • Cecile Morris
  • Anne-Laure Koliandris
  • Bettina Wolf
  • Joanne Hort
  • Andrew J. Taylor
Article

Abstract

Salt in the human diet is a major risk factor for hypertension and many countries have set targets to reduce salt consumption. Technological solutions are being sought to lower the salt content of processed foods without altering their taste. In this study, the approach was to deliver salt solutions in pulses of different concentrations to determine whether a pulsed delivery profile affected sensory perception of salt. Nine different salt profiles were delivered by a Dynataste device and a trained panel assessed their saltiness using time–intensity and single-score sensory techniques. The profile duration (15 s) was designed to match eating conditions and the effects of intensity and duration of the pulses on sensory perception were investigated. Sensory results from the profiles delivered in either water or in a bouillon base were not statistically different. Maximum perceived salt intensities and the area under the time–intensity curves correlated well with the overall perceived saltiness intensity despite the stimulus being delivered as several pulses. The overall saltiness scores for profiles delivering the same overall amount of sodium were statistically not different from one another suggesting that, in this system, pulsed delivery did not enhance salt perception but the overall amount of salt delivered in each profile did affect sensory perception.

Keywords

Dynataste Sensory Perception Sodium Chloride Time–Intensity 

References

  1. Abrahams H, Krakauer D, Dallenbach KM (1937) Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University LXXXIV Gustatory adaptation to salt. Am J Psychol 49:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus F (2007) Dietary salt intake: sources and targets for reduction. In: Kilcast D, Angus F (eds) Reducing salt in foods. Practical strategies. Woodhead, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bujas Z, Ajdukovic D, Szabo S, Mayer D, Vodanovic M (1995) Central processes in gustatory adaptation. Physiol Behav 57(5):875–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi SP, Chen TC (1992) Predicting optimum monosodium glutamate and sodium-chloride concentrations in chicken broth as affected by spice addition. J Food Process Preserv 16(5):313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desobry-Bandon S, Vickers Z (1998) Cohesiveness of mass evaluation by time–intensity and single value measurements. J Food Sci 63(1):174–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubois GE, Tsau J (1992) Low sodium salt composition suitable as table salt—comprises sodium chloride, non-gritty bulking agent and binder. Patent no. US5098724-A.Google Scholar
  7. Duizer LM, Gullett EA, Findlay CJ (1993) Time–intensity methodology for beef tenderness perception. J Food Sci 58(5):943–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganzevles PGJ, Kroeze JHA (1987) Cross-adaptation in taste measured with a filter-paper method. Chem Senses 12(2):341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halpern BP (2000) Glutamate and the flavor of foods. J Nutr 130(4):910S–914SGoogle Scholar
  10. Halpern BP, Meiselman HL (1980) Taste psychophysics based on a simulation of human drinking. Chem Senses 5(4):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hort J, Hollowood TA (2004) Controlled continuous flow delivery system for investigating taste–aroma interactions. J Agric Food Chem 52(15):4834–4843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansson B, Drake B, Pangborn RM, Barylkop N, Koster E (1973) Difference taste thresholds for sodium-chloride among young adults—interlaboratory study. J Food Sci 38(3):524–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laing DG, Prescott J, Bell GA, Gillmore R, James C, Best DJ, Allen S, Yoshida M, Yamazaki K (1993) A cross-cultural-study of taste discrimination with Australians and Japanese. Chem Senses 18(2):161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawless HT, Heymann H (1998) Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee WE (1989) Single-point versus time–intensity sensory measurements: an informational entropy analysis. J Sens Stud 4(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu YH, Macfie HJH (1990) Methods for averaging time–intensity curves. Chem Senses 15(4):471–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McBurney DH (1976) Temporal properties of human taste system. Sens Processes 1(2):150–162Google Scholar
  18. Meiselman HL, Buffington C (1980) Effects of filter-paper stimulus application on gustatory adaptation. Chem Senses 5(4):273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meiselman HL, Halpern BP (1973) Enhancement of taste intensity through pulsatile stimulation. Physiol Behav 11(5):713–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moskowitz HR (1978) Taste and food technology: acceptability, aesthetics, and preference. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP (eds) Handbook of perception via tasting and smelling. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Neyraud E, Prinz J, Dransfield E (2003) NaCl and sugar release, salivation and taste during mastication of salted chewing gum. Physiol Behav 79(4–5):731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okiyama A, Beauchamp GK (1998) Taste dimensions of monosodium glutamate (MSG) in a food system: role of glutamate in young American subjects. Physiol Behav 65(1):177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Overbosch P, Vandenenden JC, Keur BM (1986) An improved method for measuring perceived intensity time relationships in human taste and smell. Chem Senses 11(3):331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pasin G, Omahony M, York G, Weitzel B, Gabriel L, Zeidler G (1989) Replacement of sodium-chloride by modified potassium-chloride (cocrystallized disodium-5′-inosinate and disodium-5′-guanylate with potassium-chloride) in fresh pork sausages—acceptability testing using signal-detection measures. J Food Sci 54(3):553–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Theunissen MJM, Kroeze JHA (1996) Mouth movements diminish taste adaptation, but rate of mouth movement does not affect adaptation. Chem Senses 21(5):545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Theunissen MJM, Polet IA, Kroeze JHA, Schifferstein HNJ (2000) Taste adaptation during the eating of sweetened yogurt. Appetite 34(1):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuorila H, Hellemann U, Matuszewska I (1990) Can sodium contents of foods be reduced by adding flavors—studies with beef broth. Physiol Behav 47(4):709–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UK Food Standards Agency (2008) UK industry commitments to salt reduction. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/spreadsheets/saltcommitmentsum.xls. Accessed 22 December 2008
  29. Visschers RW, Jacobs MA, Frasnelli J, Hummel T, Burgering M, Boelrijk AEM (2006) Cross-modality of texture and aroma perception is independent of orthonasal or retronasal stimulation. J Agric Food Chem 54(15):5509–5515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wendin K, Hall G (2001) Influences of fat, thickener and emulsifier contents on salad dressing: static and dynamic sensory and rheological analyses. Lebensm Wiss Technol 34(4):222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamaguchi S, Takahashi C (1984) Interactions of monosodium glutamate and sodium-chloride on saltiness and palatability of a clear soup. J Food Sci 49(1):82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecile Morris
    • 1
  • Anne-Laure Koliandris
    • 1
  • Bettina Wolf
    • 1
  • Joanne Hort
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Food SciencesUniversity of NottinghamLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations