Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 87–108 | Cite as

Distance decay for supply and demand potentials

Original Paper
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

This paper introduces a model framework which identifies the economic activity of each local economy (location) and observes the time distance between each pair of locations. Time distance for interaction inside local economies is taken as reference. Two models of location patterns are formulated on the basis of principles adhering to new economic geography (NEG). The first model describes how business service firms (classified into three levels of knowledge intensity) select locations with a favorable demand potential, depicting a location’s access to customer demand. The second model takes the location of business-service supply as given and describes how other firms select locations with a favorable supply potential, depicting the access to business-service supply. In order to calculate each location’s demand and supply potentials we need distance-decay parameters for interaction outside the local economy. When estimating the two models we develop an approach where the distance-decay (time sensitivity) parameters are determined endogenously as an integral part of estimating location choice parameters. The exercise can be appreciated as a test of NEG principles.

Keywords

Demand potential Supply potential Location of sectors Distance decay Time sensitivity NEG principles 

JEL Classification

C21 L84 R11 R12 R30 

References

  1. Anas, A., Arnott, R., Small, K.: Urban spatial structure. J. Econ. Lit. 36, 1426–1464 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M., Johansson, B.: Heterogeneous distributions of firms sustained by innovation dynamics—a model with empirical illustrations and analysis. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 12, 239–263 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann, M.J.: Location Theory. Random House, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  4. Beckmann, M.J.: Lectures on Location Theory. Springer, Berlin (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coffey, W.J., Polese, M.: Producer services and regional development. Pap. Reg. Sci. 67, 13–27 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., Thisse, J.-F.: Economic Geography—The Integration of Regions and Nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R.: Collaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business services. J. Econ. Geogr. 12(1), 79–105 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duranton, G., Puga, D.: Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson, J.V., Thisse, J.F. (eds.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Chapter 48. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, M.P., Audretsch, D.B.: Innovations in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur. Econ. Rev. 43, 409–429 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujita, M., Thisse, J.-F.: Economics of Agglomeration—Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., Venables, A.J.: The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999)Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, J.: Cities and the Wealth of Nations—Principles of Economic Life. Penguin, Hammondsworth (1984)Google Scholar
  13. Johansson, B., Klaesson, J.: Infrastructure, labor market accessibility and economic development. In: Karlsson, C., Andersson, W.P., Johansson, B., Koayashi, K. (eds.) The Management and Measurement of Infrastructure, pp. 69–98. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Johansson, B., Klaesson, J.: Agglomeration dynamics of business services. Ann. Reg. Sci. 47, 373–391 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson, B., Lööf, H.: Innovation strategies combining internal and external knowledge. In: Antonelli, C., Link, A. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Knowledge, pp. 29–52. Routledge, Oxon (2015)Google Scholar
  16. Johansson, B., Johansson, S., Wallin, T.: Internal and External Knowledge—Innovation of Export Varieties, CESIS WP 297. Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2013)Google Scholar
  17. Johansson, B., Klaesson, J., Olsson, M.: Time distances and labor market integration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 81(3), 305–327 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson, B., Klaesson, J., Olsson, M.: Commuters’ non-linear response to time distances. J. Geogr. Syst. 5, 315–329 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krugman, P.: Geography and Trade. Leuven University Press, Leuven (1991)Google Scholar
  20. Lakshmanan, T.R., Hansen, W.G.: A retail market potential model. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 31, 134–143 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsuyama, K.: Complementarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. J. Econ. Lit. 33, 701–729 (1995)Google Scholar
  22. Mattsson, L.-G.: Equivalence between welfare and entropy approaches to residential location. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 14, 147–173 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCann, P.: Urban and Regional Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  24. McCann, P.: Sketching out a model of innovation, face-to-face interaction and economic geography. Spat. Econ. Anal. 2(2), 117–134 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quigley, J.M.: Urban diversity and economic growth. J. Econ. Perspect. 12, 127–140 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quigley, J.M.: Agglomeration, regional growth, and economic development. In: Klaesson, J., Johansson, B., Karlsson, C. (eds.) Metropolitan Regions: Knowledge Infrastructures of the Global Economy, pp. 29–46. Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivera-Batiz, F.L.: Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and agglomeration economies in consumption and production. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 18, 125–153 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shearmur, R.: Innovation, regions and proximity: from neo-regionalism to spatial analysis. Reg. Stud. 45(9), 1225–1244 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shearmur, R., Doloreux, D.: Urban hierarchy or local buzz? High-order producer service and (or) knowledge-intensive business service location in Canada, 1991–2001”. Prof. Geogr. 60(3), 333–355 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shearmur, R., Doloreux, D.: Innovation and knowledge-intensive business service: the contribution of knowledge intensive business service to innovation in manufacturing establishments. Econ. Innov. N. Technol. 22(8), 751–774 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weibull, J.W.: An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 6, 357–379 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEnSE (Centre of Entrepreneurship and Spatial Economics), Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.CESIS (Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies), Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  3. 3.The Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations