Advertisement

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 201–217 | Cite as

Regional diversity in residential development: a decade of urban and peri-urban housing dynamics in The Netherlands

  • Dani Broitman
  • Eric Koomen
Original Paper

Abstract

Residential development is a dynamic process, as changes in housing stock vary substantially over space and time. These spatiotemporal dynamics are expected to differ in various hierarchical levels of urban areas. Urban cores, peri-urban areas and predominantly rural areas are likely to experience different housing development processes as the economic and demographic drivers of change are different in these areas. To obtain a deeper understanding of recent changes in urban development, we analyse the residential stock development in the Netherlands, measured as the number of housing units available. At the national level housing stock is continuously growing at a fairly stable rate of 1.1 %. Disaggregating the national data into different hierarchical levels we find that in absolute numbers urban cores are growing more than peri-urban areas. However, in relative terms, peri-urban areas are growing faster than urban cores. At the regional level we find substantial differences between different geographical zones. The Randstad—the western and most urbanized region of the country—is growing more than the other regions. This is the only region, however, where residential stock in peri-urban zones grew faster than their associated urban cores. Testing the different regions and hierarchical levels for their correspondence with the generally accepted Gibrat’s law of proportionate growth, we find that the urban cores in the Randstad are growing less than could be expected from their initial size. Their peri-urban areas, on the other hand, are growing faster than their initial size would suggest. These findings hint a degree of saturation of the current urban cores in this region and a spill-over of residential development into their peri-urban areas. The study is complemented by an explanatory analysis linking socio-economic indicators and physical planning criteria (such as the amount of land available for the development and the presence of restrictive policies) to the observed residential stock development.

Keywords

Residential development Regional growth Urban Peri-urban Gibrat’s law 

JEL Classification

R14 Land use patterns R21 Housing demand R31 Housing supply and markets 

References

  1. Allen, A.: Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ. Urban. 15(1), 135–147 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpkokin, P.: Historical and critical review of spatial and transport planning in The Netherlands. Land Use Policy 293, 536–547 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alterman, R.: The challenge of farmland preservation: lessons from a six-nation comparison. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 632, 220–243 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D.L., Blei, A.M.: Making room for a planet of cities. Policy Focus Report Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Berry, B.J.L., Okulicz-Kozaryn, A.: The city size distribution debate: resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities 29, 17–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bijl, R., Boelhouwer, J., Cloïn, M., Pommer, E. (eds.): De sociale staat van Nederland. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag (2011)Google Scholar
  7. CBS: Kaart met statistieken per vierkant van 100 bij 100 meter. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/dossiers/nederland-regionaal/publicaties/geografische-data/archief/2013/2013-kaart-vierkanten-art.htm (2013a). Accessed 22 Aug 2013
  8. CBS: Statline, the central database of Statistics Netherlands. http://www.statline.nl. (2013b). Accessed 22 Aug 2013
  9. De Jong, A.: Regionale prognose 2009–2040: Vergrijzing en omslag van groei naar krimp. PBL Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, Den Haag (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Deavers, K.: What is rural? Policy Stud. J. 20(2), 184–189 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delmelle, E.C., Zhou, Y., Thill, J.C.: Densification without growth management? Evidence from local land development and housing trends in Charlotte, North Carolina USA. Sustainability 6, 3975–3990 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duca, J.V., Muellbauer, J., Murphy, A.: Housing markets and the financial crisis of 2007–2009: lessons for the future. J. Financ. Stab. 6(4), 203–217 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eeckhout, J.: Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(23), 1429–1451 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evers, W., Vries, L., De Man, R., Schotten, C.G.J.: Woning- en populatiebestanden in het dataportaal. Overzicht van de basisbestanden, bewerkingen en kwaliteitsacties. RIVM, Bilthoven (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Faludi, A., Van Der Valk, A.: Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabaix, X., Ioannides, Y.M.: The evolution of city size distributions. In: Vernon Henderson, J., Francois Thisse, Jacques (eds.) Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. Cities and geography, vol. 4. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Giesen, K., Suedekum, J.: Zipf’s Law for cities in the regions and the country. IZA DP No. 3928 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. Glaeser, E.L., Gyourko, J., Saks, R.E.: Urban growth and housing supply. J. Econ. Geogr. 6(1), 71–89 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. González-Val, R., Lanaspa, L., Sanz-Gracia, F.: New evidence on Gibrat’s law for cities. Urban Stud. 51(1), 93–115 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haase, A., Kabisch, S., Steinführer, A., Bouzarovski, S., Hall, R., Ogden, P.: Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in a European setting. Popul. Space Place 16, 443–463 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. Haase, D., Kabisch, N., Haase, A.: Endless urban growth? On the mismatch of population, household and urban land area growth and its effects on the urban debate. PLoS One 86, e66531 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hornis, W., Ritsema van Eck, J.: Het nieuwe ommeland—Veranderingen in stad-landrelaties. NAi Uitgevers, Rotterdam, Ruimtelijk Planbureau, Den Haag (2007)Google Scholar
  23. Hornis, W., van Eck Ritsema, J.: A typology of the peri-urban areas in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 99(5), 619–628 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inostroza, L., Baur, R., Csaplovics, E.: Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: a dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. J. Environ. Manag. 115, 87–97 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jongman, R.H.G.: Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 32, 169–183 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koomen, E., Dekkers, J., van Dijk, T.: Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: planning, practice and prospects. Land Use Policy 25(3), 361–377 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. Masucci, A.P., Stanilov, K., Batty, M.: Limited urban growth: London’s street network dynamics since the 18th century. PLoS One 8(8), e69469 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069469 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Orenstein, D.E., Hamburg, S.P.: Population and pavement: population growth and land development in Israel. Popul. Environ. 31, 223–254 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pahl, R.E.: The rural-urban continuum. Sociologia Ruralis 6(3), 299–329 (1966)Google Scholar
  30. Rozenfeld, H.D., Rybski, D., Andrade, J.S., Batty, M., Stanley, H.E., Makse, H.A.: Laws of population growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(48), 18702–18707 (2008)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Van der Cammen, H., De Klerk, L.A.: Ruimtelijke Ordening; van Grachtengordel tot VINEXwijk. Spectrum, Utrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  32. Vermeulen, W., van Ommeren, J.: Housing supply and the interaction of regional population and employment. CPB Discussion Paper No 65 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. VROM, LNV, V&W and EZ Nota Ruimte. Ruimte voor ontwikkeling. Ministeries van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, Verkeer en Waterstaat en Economische zaken, SDU uitgeverij, Den Haag (2004)Google Scholar
  34. Zonneveld, W., Evers, D.: Dutch national spatial planning at the end of an era. Chapter 4. In: Reimer, M., Getimis, P., Blotevogel, H. (eds.) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. Routledge (2014) (forthcoming)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VU University-AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations