Advertisement

Interregional productivity differentials: a shift-share decomposition analysis and its application to post-war Japan

  • Mitsuhiko KataokaEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study proposes a squared employment-weighted coefficient of variation through a shift-share decomposition analysis, addressing the disadvantage of Esteban’s (Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 30:353–364, 2000) variance measure. The aim is to analyze the role of each shift-share component in explaining interregional inequality in productivity per worker. Applying this inequality decomposition approach to prefectural data in post-war Japan generates several empirical results. One of the most interesting results is that the productivity differential component, which can be attributed to the region-specific sectoral productivity differential, was a dominant contributor throughout the period, although its values varied by year. Considering that the productivity differential component as an index of accumulated past investments within a given sector, its yearly variation indicates alternating policy shifts in the regional allocation of investment. This is consistent with the empirical result of Kataoka (Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 17:115–139, 2005) that the regional development policy in post-war Japan alternated between efficiency-oriented investment allocation, which implies greater investment in higher-productivity regions, and equity-oriented investment allocation, which implies greater investment in lower-productivity regions. Moreover, the divergence in the interprefectural inequality of sectoral productivity differentials and the convergence in the interprefectural inequality of the sectoral employment share, observed from the mid-1970s, imply the advance of interregional division of labor, which may result from the agglomeration of the knowledge-intensive activities in Tokyo regions. This interregional relocation was described as Tokyo monopolar regional system by Fujita and Tabuchi (Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 27:643–667, 1997).

Keywords

Inequality decomposition Interregional inequality Shift-share analysis Post-war Japan 

JEL Classification

D63 O40 R11 R58 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand, S.: The measurement of income inequality. In: Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia—Measurement and Decomposition, pp. 302–355. Oxford University Press, London (1983) Google Scholar
  2. Dall’erba, et al.: Regional productivity differentials in three new member countries: what can we learn from the 1986 enlargement to the South? Rev. Reg. Stud. 35, 97–116 (2005) Google Scholar
  3. Dunn, E.S.: A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Pap. Reg. Sci. 6, 97–112 (1960) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Esteban, J.: Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: a shift-share analysis. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 30, 353–364 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita, M., Tabuchi, T.: Regional growth in postwar Japan. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 27, 643–667 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kataoka, M.: Effect of public investment on the regional economies in postwar Japan. Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 17, 115–139 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mutlu, S.: Regional disparities, industry and government policy in Japan. Dev. Change 22, 547–586 (1991) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsChiba Keizai UniversityInageJapan

Personalised recommendations