A Questionnaire to Assess Phonation and Problems in Daily Living for Provox® Voice Prosthesis Users in Japan
- 4 Downloads
The aim of this study was to investigate the problems in daily life of Provox® users in Japan with the use of a questionnaire survey and to consider future guidance methods for these patients. We mailed questionnaires to 190 members of a Japanese laryngectomized patient group. We received 118 questionnaires with valid responses. The total voice handicap index (VHI) score was 44.1. Patients were allocated to two groups based on the type of surgery they underwent—laryngectomy or jejunum reconstruction. The VHI score was significantly lower in the simple laryngectomy group than that in the free jejunum reconstruction group (p < 0.01). Only 55.9% of the patients reported having received voice rehabilitation therapy. For other problems of daily life, many patients answered “bad/very bad” for the “smelling,” “eating/drinking hot foodstuffs,” “blowing nose,” and “quantity of sputum” categories. Based on our results, there is a requirement for an effective rehabilitation therapy and appropriate guidance for patients with the Provox® voice prosthesis.
KeywordsLaryngectomy Voice prosthesis Questionnaires and surveys Phonation
This study would not have been achieved without the cooperation of all the members of YOUSAY-KAI. We sincerely appreciate their contributions.
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YI, YY, MS, and UK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YI and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was funded by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI; Grant No. 16K20770).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (ethics review committee of the International University of Health and Welfare, Japan]) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.de Coul BO, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ, Tan IB, Van den Hoogen FJ, Van Tinteren H (2000) A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single institution’s experience with consistent application of Provox indwelling voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.126.11.1320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hilgers FJ, Ackerstaff AH, Balm AJ, Tan IB, Aaronson NK, Persson JO (1997) Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox® 2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion. Acta Otolaryngol 117:889–896. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489709114220 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fukushima H (2015) Provox voice prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 87:73–79Google Scholar
- 15.Sakurai H, Nozaki M, Sasaki K (2002) Vocal rehabilitation for cervical esophageal cancer. Surg Ther 87:338–343Google Scholar
- 16.Kanda T, Tanuma A, Onitsuka T, Nakagawa M, Ando M, Tsuji T (2008) The difference of the training process of esophageal speech by the operation method: the comparison between total laryngectomy and total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy. Jpn J Speech Lang Hear Res 5:152–159Google Scholar
- 19.Sakaguchi A, Kawamoto R, Sakaguchi H, Nakajima N (1992) The olfactory function of laryngectomized patients. Bull Sch Allied Med Sci Nagasaki Univ 5:173–176Google Scholar
- 20.Hilgers FJ, van Dam FS, Keyzers S, Koster MN, van As CJ, Muller MJ (2000) Rehabilitation of olfaction after laryngectomy by means of a nasal airflow-inducing maneuver: the polite yawning technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:726–732. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.126.6.726 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hilgers FJ, Jansen HA, van As CJ, Polak MF, Muller MJ, van Dam FS (2002) Long-term results of olfaction rehabilitation using the nasal airflow-inducing (polite yawning) maneuver after total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:648–654. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.6.648 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Risberg-Berlin B, Ylitalo R, Finizia C (2006) Screening and rehabilitation of olfaction after total laryngectomy in Swedish patients: results from an intervention study using the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.3.301 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.van den Boer C, Vas Nunes JH, Muller SH, van der Noort V, van den Brekel MW, Hilgers FJ (2014) Water uptake performance of hygroscopic heat and moisture exchangers after 24-hour tracheostoma application. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814527420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ, Aaronson NK, van Zandwuk N (1993) Improvements in respiratory and psychosocial functioning following total laryngectomy by the use of a heat and moisture exchanger. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:878–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949310201111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar