A Comparative Study Between Septal Quilting Sutures Without Nasal Packing and Only Nasal Packing Post-septal Correction
- 3 Downloads
Septal correction is the commonest surgery by rhinologists worldwide. We aimed at studying the comfort level of the patient with standard postoperative nasal packing with Merocel and placing quilting sutures in septum leaving the nose unpacked in the postoperative period. We conducted the study in the tertiary care centre enrolling 82 patients in a quasi-randomised method of odd and even numbers placing them in the nasal packing group and the quilting group respectively. We used analogue scoring method for subjective assessment of comfort level in the postoperative period and the surgeon objectively assessed the patient on follow up. The results were tabulated and analysed. Postoperative pain, headache and sleep disturbance was significantly more in the nasal packing group. We found that the crusting is commonly seen in patients in the nasal packing group. Quilting the nasal septum and leaving the nasal cavity unpacked increases the comfort level of the patient in the postoperative period. The resultant pain, headache and sleep disturbance caused by nasal packing can be significantly avoided by using quilting the septum without nasal packing. We also observed that by avoiding nasal packing postoperatively, the patients were more comfortable and compliant with the treatment regimen and follow-up.
KeywordsSeptal deviation Nasal packing Quilting suture Postoperative
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
The author hereby declares that there were no ethical issues involved in the publishing of this article in any journal.
- 3.Low WK, Willat DJ (1992) Submucous resection for deviated nasal septum. Singap Med J 33:617–619Google Scholar
- 4.Weber R, Hochapfel F, Draf W (2000) Packing and stents in endonasal surgery. Rhinology 38:49–62Google Scholar
- 6.Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 21:88–91Google Scholar
- 7.Naghibzadeh B, Peyvandi AA, Naghibzadeh G (2011) Does post septoplasty nasal packing reduce complications? Acta Med Iran 49(1):9–12Google Scholar
- 9.Muhammad IA, Rahman NU (2003) Complications of the surgery for deviated nasal septum. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 13(10):565–568Google Scholar
- 11.Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32:111–114Google Scholar
- 17.Veluswamy A, Handa S, Shivaswamy S (2011) Nasal septal clips: an alternative to nasal packing after septal surgery? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 64:1–5Google Scholar
- 18.Ansari MA, Islam U, Hirani I, Khayani IAM, Kashmiri ZA (2013) Trans-septal suturing technique without intra-nasal packing in nasal septal surgery. Pak J Surg 29(2):123–126Google Scholar
- 20.Thapa N, Pradhan B (2011) Postoperative complications of septal quilting and BIPP packing following septoplasty. J Nepal Health Res Counc 9(19):186–188Google Scholar