Comparison Between Radiological Versus Endoscopic Assessment of Adenoid Tissue in Patients of Chronic Adenoiditis
- 17 Downloads
The adenoids are a common cause for morbidity in pre-school and school going children. Adenoid hypertrophy is common cause of nasal obstruction in pediatric population. The assessment of the size of palatine tonsil hypertrophy is quiet easy to perform, however, measuring the size of nasopharyngeal tonsil and establishing its connection with the given symptoms is more difficult. This is basically due to the location of a tonsil in the nasopharyngeal cavity. Since the cavity is inaccessible directly and cannot be examined visually, many direct and indirect methods of adenoid size evaluation have been developed. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of both X-ray soft tissue nasopharynx lateral view and nasoendoscopy in evaluation of adenoid size in patients having chronic adenoiditis. Our study included 50 children in age group of 3–14 years who had signs and symptoms of adenoiditis clinically. After comparing X-ray and endoscopic findings we found that there was good agreement between X-ray and endoscopic method. Sensitivity of X-ray was 79.41% and specificity of 75% whereas sensitivity of nasoendoscopy was 87.10% and specificity was 63.16%. Nasal endoscopy is good screening method and more accurate method to assess the size of adenoids in patients of chronic adenoiditis.
KeywordsChronic adenoiditis Cohen and Konak method Fujiokas method Clemens classification Nasoendoscopy X-ray soft tissue nasopharynx
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involves Human Participants
No animal study was conducted.
Informed consent has been taken.
- 1.Stranding S (ed) (2008) Gray’s Anatomy The anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th edn. London, Churchill Livingstone ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gleeson MJ, Browning GG, Burton MJ, Clarke K, Hibbert J, Jones NS et al (eds) (2008) Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, 7th edn. Hodder Arnold, Great Britain, pp 1094–1101Google Scholar
- 3.Snow JB, Ballenger JJ (eds) (2003) Ballenger’s otorhinolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 16th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 1009–1047Google Scholar
- 5.Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, Niparko JK, Richardson MA, Robbins KT et al (eds) (2010) Cummings otolaryngology—head and neck surgery, 5th edn. Mosby/Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 2782–2802Google Scholar
- 7.Fujioka M, Young LW, Girdany BR (1979) Radiographic evaluation of adenoidal size in children: adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio. Am J Radiol 133:401–404Google Scholar
- 10.Gill JS, Bhardwaj B, Anand V, Singla S (2013) The comparative roles of X-ray nasopharynx and nasal endoscopy in diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy. Nepal J ENT Head Neck Surg 4(1):26–28Google Scholar
- 12.Dixit Y, Tripathi P (2015) Clinical and roentegenographic evaluation of adenoidal hypertrophy in children and its endoscopic assessment. Natl J Med Dental Res 3(3):162–165Google Scholar
- 13.Yaseen ET, Khammas AH, Al-Anbaky F (2012) Adenoid enlargement assessment by plain X-ray and nasoendoscopy. Iraqi J Community Med 1:88–90Google Scholar