Advertisement

Effect of Anatomical Variations of Osteomeatal Complex on Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Propective Study

  • Jayant SononeEmail author
  • Poonam Solanke
  • P. S. Nagpure
  • Deepika Garg
  • Manish Puttewar
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

This is a prospective observational cross sectional study comprising of 57 patients who were having symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis which were evaluated with the help of computed tomography scan (Coronal and axial sections) to identify various anatomical variants of osteomeatal complex and to find their percentage and to find the pattern of sinus involvement in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. The most common anatomical variation was agger nasi which was present in 52 (91.23%) patients followed by abnormal uncinate process in 43 (75.44%) patients and maxillary sinus was the most commonally involved sinus in CRS.

Keywords

Osteomeatal complex Chronic rhinosinusitis Computed tomograpgy Maxillary sinus 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of MGIMS, Sevagram and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and Animal Rights

This study does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Gliklich RE, Metson R (1995) Techniques for outcome research in chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 105(4 Pt 1):387–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaliner MA, Osguthorpe JD, Fireman P et al (1997) Sinusitis: bench to bedside. Current findings, future directions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116(6):S1–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benninger MS, Ferguson B, Hadley J et al (2003) Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3(suppl)):S1–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackwell DL, Collins JG, Coles R (2002) Summary health statistics for US adults: national health interview survey. Vital Health Stat 10:205Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31(4):183–184Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stammberger H, Wolf G (1988) Headaches and sinus diseases: the endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97(Suppl134):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dua K, Chopra H, Khurana A, Munjal M (2005) CT scan variations in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 15(3):315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tiwari R, Goyal R (2015) Study of anatomical variations on CT in chronic sinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67(1):18–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0734-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mundra RK et al (2014) CT scan study of influence of septal angle deviation on lateral nasal wall in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(2):187–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0713-7 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parson DS (1991) Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities; CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 101:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ameri AA, Eslambolchi A, Bakhshandeh H (2005) Anatomic variants of paranasal sinuses and chronic sinusitis. Iran J Radiol 2(34):121–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ENTMGIMSSevagram, WardhaIndia
  2. 2.Kasturba HospitalSevagram, WardhaIndia

Personalised recommendations