Importance and Impact of Appropriate Radiology in the Management of Branchial Cleft Anomalies
- 37 Downloads
Branchial cleft anomalies are common differential diagnosis of neck masses. However, depending on the origin (1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th arch), this pathology presents at different locations as cyst, sinus and fistula. Incomplete excision or incision and drainage of infected branchial cleft anomalies (cystic presentation) can lead to multiple recurrences. Appropriate radiology is imperative to make a correct diagnosis and to achieve complete excision to prevent recurrence. Our case series highlights the mode of presentation, appropriate radiology and management for each type of branchial cleft anomalies. Data of 27 patients with the diagnosis of branchial cleft anomaly and treated in the department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery in a tertiary care referral centre in last 5 years was analysed retrospectively. Demographic data in terms of age, sex, laterality, clinical presentation, duration of symptoms and radiological investigations if any were recorded. The mean age at presentation was 22.1 years in this series of 27 cases including six (22.2%) recurrent cases. Most common clinical presentation was discharging sinus (59.25%) followed by cystic neck swelling (33.3%). Second branchial cleft anomalies were commonest (51.8%) followed by first branchial cleft anomalies (29.6%). Appropriate radiology was available for 17 (62.9%) patients. Branchial cleft anomaly is an important differential diagnosis of neck mass. Appropriate radiology helps in complete excision and prevents recurrences. Recurrent cases pose surgical challenge owing to fibrosis from previous surgery which further increases the chances of incomplete excision.
KeywordsBranchial cleft anomalies Sinus Fistula Cyst Facial nerve monitoring
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Rajeev Kumar, Prem Sagar, Chirom Amit Singh, Rakesh Kumar, Alok Thakar, Suresh C Sharma declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 2.Prasad SC, Azeez A, Thada ND, Rao P, Bacciu A, Prasad KC (2014) Branchial anomalies: diagnosis and management. Int J Otolaryngol 237015:9Google Scholar
- 9.Tucker HM, Skolnick ML (1973) Fourth branchial cleft (pharyngeal pouch) remnant. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 77(5):368–371Google Scholar