Advertisement

A Clinico-Radiological Study: Veria Technique of Cochlear Implant—A Study of 50 Cases

  • Rajat Jain
  • Preeti Tiwari
  • Sheo Kumar
  • Prabhakar Mishra
  • P. K. Pearly
  • Amit KeshriEmail author
Original Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Main limitation of classical technique is limited access to cochlea in terms of cochlear rotations and related structures, thus causing difficulty in electrode insertion. Veria technique allows full access to cochlea after raising tympanomeatal flap. To our best knowledge this is first clinic-radiological study for Veria technique studying distance between tympanic segment of facial nerve and posterior wall of external auditory canal (EAC) demonstrating facial nerve safety. Prospective study was done on 50 patients having bilateral sensori-neural hearing loss. Patients underwent cochlear implant surgery irrespective of age and gender. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography temporal bone and magnetic resonance imaging head was done, distance between tympanic segment of facial nerve and posterior wall of EAC and basal turn angle were measured. Intraoperative NRT followed by orbito-meatal X-ray was done in post operative period. 25 (50%) were male, 25 (50%) female. 35 patients (70%) showed that the distance between tympanic segment of facial nerve and posterior wall of EAC was more than 3 mm with mean 4.41 mm (± 0.63 SD). Distance calculated was greater in older age group than younger group. Patient having inner ear malformation, mean was 3.96 mm (± .44 SD). Whereas patients having acquired disease, mean distance was 4.30 mm (± .47 SD). On gender comparison of basal turn angle score, no significant difference was observed male (54.34° ± 4.48°) versus female (55.66° ± 4.15°) (p = 0.282). Mean of basal turn angle (BTA) in ≤ 5 years age group was 54.89° ± 3.65°, in 6–10 years age group was 55.21° ± 5.23° and in age group ≥ 11 years was 54.93° ± 4° with no significant difference in mean value between the groups (p = 0.282). High jugular bulb was seen in 4 patients (2 in right side, 2 in left side), hypoplastic jugular bulb was seen in 10 patients (9 in left, 1 in right), otosclerosis in 2 patients. Veria technique is safe for facial nerve, as preoperatively distance between tympanic segment of facial nerve and posterior canal wall can be identified. It is suitable method for rotated cochlea (identified preoperatively through BTA) and deformed cochlea as it offers a wide visibility and accessibility as compared to posterior tympanotomy approach. BTA and distance between posterior canal wall of EAC and tympanic segment of facial nerve should be done in all cases to see any cochlear rotation and feasibility of surgery.

Keywords

Cochlear implant Veria Basal turn angle Facial nerve 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma S, Grover M, Singh SN, Kataria T, Lakhawat RS (2018) Cochlear orientation: pre-operative evaluation and intra-operative significance. J Laryngol Otol 132:540–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kiratzidis T (2000) Veria operation: cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. Adv Otolrhinolarygol 57:27–130Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell B, Gerber N, Williamson T, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W, Caversaccio M, Weber S (2013) In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access. Otol Neurotol 34(7):1284–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiratzidis T, Illiades T, Arnolde W (2002) Veria operation updated/veria operation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64(6):406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chole RA, Brodie HA, Jacob A (2006) Surgery of the mastoid and petrosa. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD (eds) Head & neck surgery—otorhinolaryngology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2094–2111Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waltzman SB, Roland JT (2005) Cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months. Pediatrics 116(4):e487–e493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woolley AL, Oser AB, Lusk RP, Bahadori RS (1997) Preoperative temporal bone computed tomography scan and its use in evaluating the pediatric cochlear implant candidate. Laryngoscope 107(8):1100–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sasindran V, Joseph A, Abraham SS, Hiremath SB (2014) High-riding jugular bulb: a rare entity year. Indian J Otol 20(3):129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hourani R, Carey J, Yousem DM (2005) Dehiscence of the jugular bulb and vestibular aqueduct: findings on 200 consecutive temporal bone computed tomography scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(5):657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedmann DR, Le BT, Pramanik BK, Lalwani AK (2010) Clinical spectrum of patients with erosion of the inner ear by jugular bulb abnormalities. Laryngoscope 120(2):365–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopen Q, Zhou G, Poe D, Kenna M, Jones D (2010) Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence: first reported case series. Otol Neurotol 31(2):339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lloyd SK, Kasbekar AV, Kenway B, Prevost T, Hockman M, Beale T, Graham J (2010) Developmental changes in cochlear orientation - implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 31:902–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsot-Dupuch K, Meyer B (2001) Cochlear implant assessment: imaging issues. Eur J Radiol 40(2):119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westerhof JP, Rademaker J, Weber BP, Becker H (2001) Congenital malformations of the inner ear and the vestibulocochlear nerve in children with sensorineural hearing loss: evaluation with CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hans JM, Prasad R (2015) Cochlear implant surgery by Veria technique: how and why? Experience from 1400 cases. Indian J Otolarngol Head NecK Surgery 67(2):107–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikhail S, Mandour MF, El-Zayat S, Hamad MH (2018) Lateral rotation of the basal turn of the cochlea with its impact on cochlear implant feasibility. Med J Cairo Univ 86(1):383–387Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajat Jain
    • 1
  • Preeti Tiwari
    • 2
  • Sheo Kumar
    • 2
  • Prabhakar Mishra
    • 3
  • P. K. Pearly
    • 1
  • Amit Keshri
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgerySanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia
  3. 3.Department of BiostaticsSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations