Advertisement

Ethnic Variation of Sinonasal Anatomy on CT Scan and Volumetric Analysis

  • Venkata Joga Prasanth Mokhasanavisu
  • Rohit SinghEmail author
  • R. Balakrishnan
  • Rajagopal Kadavigere
Original Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

To determine Ethnic differences in the frequency of the relatively common anatomical variants along with difference in anatomy of sinonasal region with surgical importance. A study was conducted to determine the frequency of anatomical variants, volumes of paranasal sinuses using computed tomography and to identify any difference between Group A consisting of people of Indian subcontinent and Group B consisting of people from north east Asian region. Volumetric analysis done using cumulative of area multiplied by slice thickness. The results were compared using Chi square test, p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among the common and uncommon anatomical variants (Agger nasi, pneumatized uncinate, concha bullosa etc.) there was no significant difference between the two groups. In both the groups Keros Type 1 was the most common type of ethmoid roof seen. On volumetric analysis sphenoid sinus volume was found to be higher in Indians without mongoloid features. Hence it’s ideal that in this era of endoscopic sinus surgery we tailor make approaches to address individual anatomical variation.

Keywords

Paranasal sinuses Anatomic variation Ethnic CT-scan Volumetric analysis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approval from institutional ethical committee.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Rowe Jones J, Mackay I, Colguhoun I (1995) Charing cross CT protocol for endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 109(11):1057–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang L, Han D, Ge W, Tao J, Wang X, Li Y, Zhou B (2007) Computed tomographic and endoscopic analysis of supraorbital ethmoid cells. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(4):562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stammberger H (1991) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: the Messerklinger technique. B.C. Decker, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolf G, Anderhuber W, Kuhn F (1993) Development of the paranasal sinuses in children: implications for paranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102(9):705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Badia L, Lund VJ, Wei W (2005) Ethnic variation in sinonasal anatomy on CT scanning. Rhinology 43:210–214Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yeoh KH, Tan KK (1994) The optic nerve in the posterior ethmoid in Asians. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 114:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS (1991) Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT Analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 101:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lloyd GA, Lund VJ, Scadding GK (1991) CT of the paranasal sinuses and functional endoscopic surgery: a critical analysis of 100 symptomatic patients. J Laryngol Otol 105(3):181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perez Pinas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Jiménez-Castellanos J (2000) Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat 197:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adeel M, Rajput MS, Akhter S, Ikram M, Arain A, Khattak YJ (2013) Anatomical variantions of nose and paranasal sinuses; CT scan review. J Pak Med Assoc 63(3):317–319Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Min Y-G, Koh T-Y, Rhee C-S, Han M-H (1995) Clinical implications of the uncinate process in paranasal sinusitis: radiologic evaluation. Am J Rhinol 9(3):131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tonai A, Baba S (1996) Anatomic variations of the bone in sinonasal CT. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 525:9–13Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moulin G, Dessi P, Chagnaud C et al (1994) Dehiscence of the lamina papyracea of the ethmoid bone: CT findings. Am J Neuroradiol 15(1):151–153Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lien C-F, Weng H-H, Chang Y-C, Lin Y-C, Wang W-H (2010) Computed Tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 120:2521–2527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han D, Zhang L, Ge W, Tao J, Xian J, Zhou B (2008) Multiplanar computed tomographic analyisis of the frontal recess region in Chinese subjects without frontal sinus disease symptoms. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 70(2):104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee WT, Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ (2004) 3D computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(3):164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chow JM, Mafee MF (1989) Radiological assessment preoperative to endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngolclin North Am 22(4):691–701Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderhuber W, Walch C, Fock C (2001) Configuration of ethmoid roof in children 0Y14 years of age. Laryngorhinootologie 80:509–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Souza SA, Souza MMA, Idagawa M et al (2008) Computed tomography assessment of the ethmoid roof: a relevant region at risk in endoscopic sinus surgery. Radiol Bras 41:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paber J, Cabato M, Villarta R (2008) Hernandez J radiographic analysis of the Ethmoid roof based on KEROS classification among Filipinos. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 23(1):15–19Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sahin C, Yılmaz Y, Titiz A et al (2007) Türk Toplumunda Etmoid C, atı ve Kafa Tabanı Analizi. KBB ve BBC Dergisi 15:1–6Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Basak S, Akdilli A, Karaman CZ et al (2000) Assessment of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by computed tomography in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 55:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mason JD, Jones NS, Hughes RJ, Holland IM (1998) A systematic approach to the interpretation of computed tomography scans prior to endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 112(10):986–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Driben JS, Bolger WE, Robles HA et al (1998) The reliability of computerized tomographic detection of the Onodi (Spheno-ethmoid) cell. Am J Rhinol 12:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A (2007) Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:191–195 004;118:877–81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen O, Warman M, Fried M, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Adi M, Halperin D, Lahav Y (2018) Auris, nasus, larynx Volumetric analysis of the maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses: a comparative computerized tomography based study. Auris Nasus Larynx 45(1):96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kawarai Y, Fukushima K, Ogawa T, Nishizaki K, Gunduz M, Fujimoto M et al (1999) Volume quantification of healthy paranasal cavity by threedimensional CT imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 540:45–49Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yonetsu K, Watanabe M, Nakamura T (2000) Age-related expansion and reduction in aeration of the sphenoid sinus: volume assessment by helical CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:179–182Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fernandes CL (2004) Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses of Zulu and European crania by helical, multislice computed tomography. J Laryngol Otol 118(11):877–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park IH, Song JS, Choi H, Kim TH, Hoon S, Lee SH et al (2010) Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:1347–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dessi P, Castro F, Triglia JM et al (1994) Major complications of sinus surgery: a review of 1192 procedures. J Laryngol Otol 108:212–215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical CollegeManipal Academy of Higher EducationManipalIndia
  2. 2.Kasturba Medical CollegeManipal Academy of Higher EducationManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations