A Study of Use of Autologous Cartilage in Ossicular Reconstruction

  • Prakash Nagenahlli SiddappaEmail author
  • Puneeth Poojar Jayakumar
  • Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda
Original Article


Ossiculoplasty is one of the commonly done and challenging surgery in otology and has been done using various graft materials. Materials such as autologous cartilage (tragal or conchal) or allograft (homograft) of the same tissue and synthetic materials like polyethylene TORP, ceramic and hydroxyapatite PORP or Titanium prosthesis have been used. But the latter synthetic materials are expensive and have high extrusion rates. Autologous cartilage grafts are selected for Ossiculoplasty as they are easy to harvest at the same site of operation, non-toxic, has less extrusion rate, minimum shrinkage and lateralization. The aim of this study is to know the efficacy of cartilage in ossicular reconstruction and to evaluate hearing outcome. It is a prospective study done on patients attending ENT outpatient department at hospitals attached to J.J.M Medical College, Davanagere. 50 patients were included in the study who underwent ossicular reconstruction either with canal wall up or down mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty. Pre-operative mean ABG was 39.3 db whereas 6 months post-operative mean ABG was 31.6 db with mean ABG improvement of 7.7 db which was statistically significant. Hearing improvement is better in cases where stapes suprastructure was present and also in canal wall up mastoidectomy procedures. This study suggests that cartilage graft (tragal and conchal) is effective in cases of ossicular reconstruction in patients of chronic otitis media and gives good hearing gain. It is also a economical option in developing countries.


Tragal cartilage Conchal cartilage Ossicular reconstruction 


  1. 1.
    Siddiq MA, Raut VV (2006) Early results of titanium ossiculoplasty using the Kurz titanium prosthesis—a UK perspective. J Laryngol Otol 121(6):539–544 (Epub 2006 Nov 2) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmerber S, Troussier J, Dumas G et al (2006) Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses. Eur Arch Oto Rhino Laryngol 263(4):347–354 (Epub 2005 Dec 3) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C et al (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28(4):492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yung M (2006) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dornhoffer JL (2006) Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39(6):1161–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kyrodimos E, Sismanis A, Santos D (2007) Type III cartilage “shield” tympanoplasty: an effective procedure for hearing improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(6):982–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doi T, Hosoda Y, Kaneko T et al (2007) Hearing results for ossicular reconstruction using a cartilage-connecting hydroxyapatite prosthesis with a spearhead. Otol Neurotol 28:1041–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozer E, Bayazit YA, Kanlikama M, Mumbuc S, Ozen Z (2002) Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otol Neurotol 23(5):643–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beatty CW et al (1998) Bone cement reconstruction of the ossicular chain: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 108:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Austin DF (1971) Ossicular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 94(6):525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kartush JM (1994) Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27(4):689–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shreshtha S, Sinha BK (2006) Hearing results after myringoplasty. Kathmandu Univ Med J 4(4):455–459Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohanty S et al (2015) comparative study of outcome of ossiculoplasty using cartilage graft, bone and different alloplasts in chronic otitis media. Indian J Otol 21:144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chole RA, Kim HJ (1996) Ossiculoplasty with presculpted banked cartilage. Operative techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 7:38–44Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jha S, Mehta K, Prajapati V, Patel D, Kharadi P (2011) A comparative study of ossiculoplasty by using various graft materials. NJIRM 2(4):53–55Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey SA, Lin SY (1999) Double cartilage block ossiculoplasty in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 109(6):911–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prakash Nagenahlli Siddappa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Puneeth Poojar Jayakumar
    • 2
  • Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ENTJ.J.M Medical CollegeDavangereIndia
  2. 2.Department of ENTJ.J.M Medical CollegeDavangereIndia

Personalised recommendations