Advertisement

Mitomycin-C in Post-endoscopic Septoplasty Synechiae: Does it Really Helps?

  • Abu Sayeed
  • Mehtab AlamEmail author
  • Satish Chandra Sharma
  • Syed Abrar Hasan
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Endoscopic septoplasty has advantage of magnified image and access to posterior part of the septum. Synechiae formation is a common complication of this procedure. The incidence of adhesions rises particularly in cases of submucosal flap tears which is sometimes unavoidable during spurectomy. Various procedures like septal splints, nasal packings have been tried to reduce the incidence of adhesions. Recently mitomycin-C is being tried to decrease post operative adhesions after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, endoscopic Dacrocystorhinostomy, with varying degree of success. Mitomycin-C has got anti fibroblastic activity, which inhibits the fibroblasts without hampering epithelization. Eighty (80) Patients undergoing septoplasty and spurectomy were observed for any submucosal flap tear, and those developing flap tear were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 40 each. In group-1 topical mitomycin (0.4 mg/ml) was applied at the raw area for 5 min, similarly normal saline was applied in group-2 (control).The aim of study was to evaluate the role of mitomycin-C in preventing post operative adhesions in Endoscopic septoplasty. Adhesion rate was calculated at 1 month, and compared using Chi square test. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. The adhesion rate at 1 month was 17.5% in group-1 and 45% in group-2 (P = 0.008). Incidence of adhesion decreased significantly in mitomycin-C treated group. Mitomycin-C can routinely be used in septoplasty to prevent post op adhesions, particularly in cases of submucosal flap tears/concurrent turbinate reduction procedures.

Keywords

Mitomycin-C Endoscopic-septoplasty Post-operative synechiae 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Otolaryngology (2009) Fact Sheet: Deviated Septum. 04 Feb 2009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alpini D, Corti A, Brusa E et al (1986) Septal deviation in newborn infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 11:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamid OA (1990) Deviated Nasal Septum in Saudi Newborns. Ann Saud Med 10(3):293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cottle MH, Fischer GG, Loring RM, et al (1956) Early nasal injuries. Presented at the Meeting of the American Medical Association. (Cited in: Jazbi B (1977) Subluxation of the nasal septum in the newborn: etiology, diagnosis, treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 10:125–36)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abhinandan Bhattacharjee S, Uddin PP (2005) Deviated nasal septum in the newborn—A 1-year study.Indian Journal of. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57(4):304–308Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goyal P, Hwang PH (2012) Rhinology: diseases of the nose, sinuses, and skull base, Ch 34. In: Surgery of the septum and turbinates Thieme publications, pp 444–456Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shone GR, Clegg RT (1987) Nasal adhesions. J Laryngol Otol 101:555–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    White A, Murray JA (1988) Intranasal adhesions formation following surgery for chronic nasal obstruction. Clin Otholaryngol 13:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Junior RGC et al (2008) Frequency of nasal synechia after septoplasty with turbinectomy with or without the use of nasal splints. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 12:124–127Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahbar R, Shapshay SM, Healy GB (2001) Mitomycin: effects on laryngeal and tracheal stenosis, benefits and complications. Ann Oto Rhino Laryngo 110:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee DA (1994) Antifibrosis agent in glaucoma surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3789–3791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rohail A, Khan AA, Shafi A, Zia R, Akram S (2015) Frequency of intranasal adhesion in septoplasty without putting nasal splints. PJMHS 9(2):498Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jain L, Jain M, Chouhan AN, Harshwardhan R (2011) Conventional septoplasty verses endoscopic septoplasty: a comparative study. Peoples J Sci Re 4:24–28Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bothra R, Mathur NN (2009) Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Laryngol Otol 123:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pringle MB (1992) The use of intra-nasal splints: a consultant survey. UK Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17(6):535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harugop AS, Mudhol R, Nargund A, Hugar S, Kapoor A, Shetty R (2014) Efficacy of Mitomycin-C for prevention of adhesion formation after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in cases of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective cross-sectional study. Clin Rhinol An Int J 7(3):100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wellington YY, Luuis C (2012) The use of mitomycin-C to reduce synechia in middle meatus in sinus surgery: preliminary results. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78(5):44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaidyanathan V, Balasubramanian D, Suria Gopalakrishnan S, Saxena SK, Shanmugasundaram N (2012) Topical Mitomycin C in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1791–1794.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1870-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tilakraj S, Himani L, Natesh V (2011) Role of Mitomycin-C in prevention of post operative adhesions after endoscopic sinus surgery—a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63(3):249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0145-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chung JH, Cosenza MJ, Rahbar R et al (2002) Mitomycin C for the prevention of adhesion formation after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, controlled study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gupta V, Singh I, Dwivedi G, Goyal S, Kumar M, Sood A et al (2018) A comparative study in the use of topical mitomycin-C versus nasolacrimal stent in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for chronic dacryocystitis. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 4:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farooq MU, Ansari MA, Khyani IAM (2013) Role of mitomycin-c in endoscopic management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Dow Univ Health Sci Karachi 7(2):63–67Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harugop AS, Rekha BK, Mudhol RS, Zingade ND, Hugar SM, Das AT, Maheswaran M (2013) Randomized placebo controlled trial of Mitomycin-C in surgical outcome of primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Al Ameen J Med Sci 6(3):231–236Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jain NK, Vashistha S, Kaushik S (2013) Comparative study of endonasal endoscopic dacryorhinostomy with or without intraoperative Mitomycin C. Clin Rhinol: Int J 6(2):77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical CollegeAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations