Endoscopic Myringoplasty Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty in Tubotympanic CSOM: A Comparative Study of 120 Cases
- 184 Downloads
Myringoplasty is one of the commonest operations performed on the middle ear. Our aim was to compare the results of endoscopic permeatal myringoplasty with that of conventional myringoplasty by post aural approach using operating microscope. A total of 120 patients having central perforation of tympanic membrane were randomly divided into two equal groups of 60 patients each. In the first group, endoscope was used and in the second group microscope was used to do myringoplasty. Temporalis fascia was used as a graft material. The patients were kept in follow-up for 1 year. The pre-operative and post-operative audiograms, post-operative pain, graft uptake and time taken for surgery were compared in both the groups. The graft uptake rate was 91.67% in the endoscopic group, whereas it was 93.3% in the microscopic group. Post-operative pain was significantly less in the endoscopic group as compared with microscopic group and not much difference was found in the gain in A-B gap in either group. The mean ABG gain was 16.16 dB (SD = 4.68) in endoscopic group and 19.54 dB (SD = 3.45) in microscopic group. On applying the Mann–Whitney U test, this finding was statistically significant (p value = 0.0001). In our study success rate was equal between endoscopic and microscopic technique. In terms of morbidity and postoperative recovery endoscope produced better results. Endoscopic tympanoplasty can be a good alternative of microscopic tympanoplasty.
KeywordsCSOM Endoscopic myringoplasty Conventional myringoplasty Post aural approach Oto-endoscopy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Godhi RA (2008) A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and microscope assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 60:290–302Google Scholar
- 2.Glasscock ME, Shambaugh GE (2003) Tympanoplasty. In: Glasscock and Shambaugh, surgery of the ear, 5th edn. People’s Medical Publishing House, Connecticut, pp 350–370Google Scholar
- 9.Mc Kennan KX (1993) Endoscopic second look mastoidoscopy to rule out residual epitympanic—mastoid cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 103:810–814Google Scholar
- 10.Kennady DW (1997) Endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 30:313–330Google Scholar
- 11.Fry TL, Newton DF (1979) Otoscopy and photography. Ann Otolaryngol 88:771–773Google Scholar
- 12.Konrad HR et al (1979) Paediatric otoscopy and photography of the tympanic membrane. Otolaryngology 105:431–433Google Scholar
- 15.Usami S, Iijima N, Fujita S et al (2001) Endoscope-assisted myringoplasty. Otorhinolaryngology 63:287–290Google Scholar
- 19.Lela M, Michael W (2015) Minimally invasive transcanal endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopy—innovative uses and emerging technologies. In: Associate Prof. Amornyotin S (ed), InTech. doi: 10.5772/60551. http://www.intechopen.com/books/endoscopy-innovative-uses-and-emerging-technologies/minimally-invasive-transcanal-endoscopic-ear-surgery