A Short Term Comparison of Cartilage with Temporalis Fascia Graft Tympanoplasty in Paediatric and Adolescent Population

  • Neeraj Narayan Mathur
  • Vinoth ManimaranEmail author
  • Anupal Deka
Original Article


To compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of the cartilage and temporalis fascia graft materials in type 1 tympanoplasty in paediatric and adolescent population. A total of 55 patients aged <18 years who required type 1 tympanoplasty were selected. 30 patients underwent cartilage palisade tympanoplasty and 25 using temporalis fascia grafts. The age, the side of the operated ear, the operative technique, pre- and post operative pure tone and impedance audiological results, and the status of the graft were noted. Graft was considered taken up if there was successful closure of tympanic membrane perforation. At the end of 6 months, the graft take rate for cartilage was 90% and for temporalis fascia it was 80% (p > 0.05). ABG closure ratio in cartilage group was 58.54 ± 23.10% and in temporalis fascia group was 56.46 ± 27.4% (p > 0.05). Pre operatively all patients had type B tympanogram in both the groups. While post operatively either type A or C curve was seen in 80% patients of cartilage and 68% patients of temporalis fascia group. Hearing outcomes and graft success rates were high in both fascia and cartilage graft groups but not significantly different.


Pediatric Tympanoplasty Cartilage Temporalis fascia 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest between any of authors.

Ethical Standard

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the parents/guardians of the participants included in the study, as the study included pediatric population.


  1. 1.
    Wullstein HL (1953) Functional operations in the middle ear with split thickness skin graft. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 161:422–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zoellner F (1955) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69:567–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heermann H (1960) Tympanic membrane plastic with temporal fascia. Hals Naser Ohren 9:136–139Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheehy JL, Anderson RG (1980) Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89:331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joynt JA (1919) Repair of drum. Iowa Med Soc 9:51Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heermann JJ, Heermann H, Kopstein E (1970) Fascia and cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Nine years experience. Arch Otolaryngol 91(3):228–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koch WM, Friedman EM, McGill TJ, Healy GB (1990) Tympanoplasty in children. The Boston children’s hospital experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merenda D, Koike K, Sha Wei M, Ramadan H (2007) Tympanometric volume: a predictor of success of tympanoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pignataro L, Grillo Della Beta L, Cappacio P, Zaghis A (2001) Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 115:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP (2002) Myringoplasty: does size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emir H, Ceylan K (2007) Kizilkaya. Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty: influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 624:595–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tek A, Karaman M, Uslu C, Habeşoğlu T, Kılıçarslan Y, Durmuş R, Esen S, Egeli E (2012) Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1117–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N (2011) Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(3):471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Karadas H, Acıkgoz C, Caylan R, Samim EE (2014) Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties. Am J Otolaryngol 35(6):796–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vashishth A, Mathur NN, Choudhary SR, Bhardwaj A (2014) Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 41(5):422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dornhoffer JL (1997) Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 107:1094–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozbek C, Çifti O, Tuna EEU, Yazkan O, Ozdem C (2008) A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 29:679–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaslin M, Robert C, Reilly O, Morlet T, McCormick M (2007) Pediatric cartilage interleave tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdellatf H, Y R, Omar M, Hassan N, Lahcen A, Abdelaziz R (2015) Myringoplasty in children: retrospective analysis of 60 cases. Pan Afr Med J 20:82Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee JC, Lee SR, Nam JK, Lee TH, Kwon JK (2012) Comparison of different grafting techniques in type I tympanoplasty in cases of significant middle ear granulation. Otol Neurotol 33(4):586–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moore GF (2002) Revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis cartilage (candidate’s thesis). Laryngoscope 112:1543–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Awad OG, Hamid KA (2015) Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(6):532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neeraj Narayan Mathur
    • 1
  • Vinoth Manimaran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anupal Deka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryVardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations