To investigate the ototoxic effects of different concentrations of povidone-iodine solutions applied to the middle ear cavity of rats using distortion product otoacoustic emissions. 24 healthy 3–3.5-month-old adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups. The group A (n = 8 ears) received 5 % povidone-iodine solution to the right ear, the group B (n = 8 ears) received 7.5 % povidone-iodine solution to the right ear and the group C (n = 8 ears) received 10 % povidone-iodine solution to the right ear. All animals received saline solution to the left ear as a control (n = 24 ears). The animals were tested before, 1 and 10 days after solutions administration to the middle ear. The resulting distortion product otoacoustic emissions were evaluated at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 kHz. Statistically significant reductions in DP-gram amplitudes were noted at high frequencies (7, 8, 10, 12 kHz) in the group A at day 1 but this effect return at day 10. In group B and group C statistically significant differences were recorded for low and high frequencies (1.5, 2, 7, 8, 10, 12 kHz) according to the control group at day 1 and 10. 7.5 and 10 % povidone-iodine showed a significant ototoxic effect on day 1 and 10. But this toxic effect could not be elicited in 5 % povidone-iodine group on day 10. The present study revealed that commercially available high concentration povidone-iodine solution may cause significant ototoxic effects when applied topically through a perforated ear drum in rats. Based on results of this experiment, high concentration povidone-iodine solutions should not be used for preoperative surgical site cleansing for otologic surgery.
Povidone-iodine Concentration Ototoxicity Rat
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Moen MD, Noone MB, Kirson I (2002) Povidone-iodine spray technique versus traditional scrub-paint technique for preoperative abdominal wall preparation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1434–1436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalantar-Hormozi AJ, Davami B (2005) No need for preoperative antiseptics in elective outpatient plastic surgical operations: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:529–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garibaldi RA, Skolnick D, Lerer T, Poirot A, Graham J, Krisuinas E, Lyons R (1988) The impact of preoperative skin disinfection on preventing intraoperative wound contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 9:109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earnshaw JJ, Berridge DC, Slack RCB, Makin GS, Hopkinson BR (1989) Do preoperative chlorhexidine baths reduce the risk of infection after vascular reconstruction? Eur J Vasc Surg 3:323–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell G, Russell AD (1999) Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:147–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
Burks RI (1998) Povidone-iodine solution in wound treatment. Phys Ther 78:212–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mayer DA, Tsapogas MJ (1993) Povidone-iodine and wound healing: a critical review. Wounds 5:14–23Google Scholar
Jayaraj KK, Jayachandran E, Gridhar B, Nair R, Jayakandan M, Kathiravan M, GMl Srinivas (2009) Formulation and evaluation of povidone iodine liquid anti-dandruff shampoo. J Pharm Sci Res 1:108–111Google Scholar
Sunil Kumar P, Raja Babu P, Jagadish Reddy G, Uttam A (2011) Povidone iodine–revisited. IJDA 3:617–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichibangase T, Yamano T, Miyagi M, Nakagawa T, Morizono T (2011) Ototoxicity of povidone-iodine applied to the middle ear cavity of guinea pigs. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 75:1078–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar