Assessment of Olfaction Using the “I-Smell” Test in an Indian Population: A Pilot Study

  • Neelima Gupta
  • P. P. Singh
  • Arun Goyal
  • Darvesh Bhatia
Original Article

Abstract

The objective of our study was to assess the olfactory function in patients having sinonasal disease and in normal healthy individuals and to establish a clinical test for olfaction in Indian population. Odor threshold and odor identification testing in patients of sinonasal disease and in subjects with no sinonasal disease was done in an academic tertiary medical center. Fifty patients with sinonasal disease (Group A) and 100 normal subjects with no complaints of olfactory dysfunction (Group B) were prospectively recruited. Group A was evaluated using visual analogue scales for subjective grading of olfactory function, nasal endoscopy and odor threshold and identification abilities. Group B was evaluated using nasal endoscopy and combined olfactory score. The combined olfactory score (COS) in group A ranged from 0 to 15 (mean 7.85, SD 2.26). The score in group B ranged from 7 to 19 (mean 14.57, SD 4.78). Statistically significant correlation was observed between VAS and COS (r = 0.764, p < 0.001) and nasal endoscopy score and COS (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) in group A. The “I-Smell” test could effectively discriminate between subjects with olfactory dysfunction and the normosmic subjects and is feasible to be used in Indian population.

Keywords

Olfaction Olfactory threshold test Olfactory identification test 

References

  1. 1.
    Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, Dinardo LJ, Reiter ER (2001) Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:497–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doty RL, Bromley SM (2008) Abnormalities of smell. In: Gleeson M (ed) Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Hodder Arnold, Great Britain, pp 1660–1676Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jackman AH, Doty RL (2005) Utility of a three-item smell identification test in detecting olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 115:2209–2212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS (1984) University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 94:176–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) “Sniffin’ sticks”: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34(4):222–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katotomichelakis M, Balatsouras D, Tripsianis G, Tsaroucha A, Homsioglou E, Danielides V (2007) Normative values of olfactory function testing using the ‘Sniffin sticks’. Laryngoscope 117:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G (1988) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut chemosensory clinical research center. Laryngoscope 98:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW (1996) Development of the 12-item cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lam HCK, Sung JKK, Abdullah VJ, Hasselt CA (2006) The combined olfactory test in a Chinese population. J Laryngol Otol 120:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Konstantinidis I, Printza A, Genetzaki S, Mamali K, Kekes G, Constantinidis J (2008) Cultural adaptation of an olfactory identification test: the Greek version of Sniffin’ sticks. Rhinology 46(4):292–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang RS, Su MC, Liang KL, Shiao JY, Wu SH, Hsin CH (2010) A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test for application in Taiwan. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(1):45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shu CH, Yuan BC (2008) Assessment of odor identification function in Asia using a modified ‘Sniffin’ Stick’ odor identification test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(7):787–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P (1995) A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 20:645–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hummel T, Konnerth CG, Rosenheim K, Kobal G (2001) Screening of olfactory function with a four minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:976–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobal G, Palisch K, Wolf SR, Meyer ED, Huttenbrink KB, Roscher S, Wagner R, Hummel T (2001) A threshold like measure for the assessment of olfactory sensitivity: the “random” procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwartz BS, Doty RL, Monroe C, Frye R, Barker S (1989) Olfactory function in chemical workers exposed to acrylate and methacrylate vapors. Am J Public Health 79:613–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simola M, Malmberg H (1998) Sense of smell in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Allergy 53:190–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doty RL, Mishra A (2001) Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis, and rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 111:409–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T (2002) Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:635–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hashimoto Y, Fukazawa K, Fujii M, Takayasu S, Muto T, Saito S, Takashima Y, Sakagami M (2004) Usefulness of the odor stick identification test for Japanese patients with olfactory dysfunction. Chem Senses 29(7):565–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neelima Gupta
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. P. Singh
    • 1
  • Arun Goyal
    • 1
  • Darvesh Bhatia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity College of Medical Sciences, GTB HospitalDelhiIndia
  2. 2.DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations