Assessment of Olfaction Using the “I-Smell” Test in an Indian Population: A Pilot Study
- 84 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
The objective of our study was to assess the olfactory function in patients having sinonasal disease and in normal healthy individuals and to establish a clinical test for olfaction in Indian population. Odor threshold and odor identification testing in patients of sinonasal disease and in subjects with no sinonasal disease was done in an academic tertiary medical center. Fifty patients with sinonasal disease (Group A) and 100 normal subjects with no complaints of olfactory dysfunction (Group B) were prospectively recruited. Group A was evaluated using visual analogue scales for subjective grading of olfactory function, nasal endoscopy and odor threshold and identification abilities. Group B was evaluated using nasal endoscopy and combined olfactory score. The combined olfactory score (COS) in group A ranged from 0 to 15 (mean 7.85, SD 2.26). The score in group B ranged from 7 to 19 (mean 14.57, SD 4.78). Statistically significant correlation was observed between VAS and COS (r = 0.764, p < 0.001) and nasal endoscopy score and COS (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) in group A. The “I-Smell” test could effectively discriminate between subjects with olfactory dysfunction and the normosmic subjects and is feasible to be used in Indian population.
Keywords
Olfaction Olfactory threshold test Olfactory identification testReferences
- 1.Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, Dinardo LJ, Reiter ER (2001) Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:497–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Doty RL, Bromley SM (2008) Abnormalities of smell. In: Gleeson M (ed) Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Hodder Arnold, Great Britain, pp 1660–1676Google Scholar
- 3.Jackman AH, Doty RL (2005) Utility of a three-item smell identification test in detecting olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 115:2209–2212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS (1984) University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 94:176–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) “Sniffin’ sticks”: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34(4):222–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Katotomichelakis M, Balatsouras D, Tripsianis G, Tsaroucha A, Homsioglou E, Danielides V (2007) Normative values of olfactory function testing using the ‘Sniffin sticks’. Laryngoscope 117:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G (1988) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut chemosensory clinical research center. Laryngoscope 98:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW (1996) Development of the 12-item cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lam HCK, Sung JKK, Abdullah VJ, Hasselt CA (2006) The combined olfactory test in a Chinese population. J Laryngol Otol 120:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Konstantinidis I, Printza A, Genetzaki S, Mamali K, Kekes G, Constantinidis J (2008) Cultural adaptation of an olfactory identification test: the Greek version of Sniffin’ sticks. Rhinology 46(4):292–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jiang RS, Su MC, Liang KL, Shiao JY, Wu SH, Hsin CH (2010) A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test for application in Taiwan. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(1):45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Shu CH, Yuan BC (2008) Assessment of odor identification function in Asia using a modified ‘Sniffin’ Stick’ odor identification test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(7):787–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P (1995) A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 20:645–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hummel T, Konnerth CG, Rosenheim K, Kobal G (2001) Screening of olfactory function with a four minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:976–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kobal G, Palisch K, Wolf SR, Meyer ED, Huttenbrink KB, Roscher S, Wagner R, Hummel T (2001) A threshold like measure for the assessment of olfactory sensitivity: the “random” procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schwartz BS, Doty RL, Monroe C, Frye R, Barker S (1989) Olfactory function in chemical workers exposed to acrylate and methacrylate vapors. Am J Public Health 79:613–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Simola M, Malmberg H (1998) Sense of smell in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Allergy 53:190–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Doty RL, Mishra A (2001) Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis, and rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 111:409–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T (2002) Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:635–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hashimoto Y, Fukazawa K, Fujii M, Takayasu S, Muto T, Saito S, Takashima Y, Sakagami M (2004) Usefulness of the odor stick identification test for Japanese patients with olfactory dysfunction. Chem Senses 29(7):565–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar