Advertisement

Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mucosal Flaps: Our Experience

  • Aniruddha Majumder
  • Mukesh Singh
  • Chiranjib Das
  • Saumik Das
  • Tapan kanti Hazra
Original Article

Abstract

The endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) has distinct advantage over external DCR. There is no ugly scar on the face, less intraoperative bleeding, it is a daycare procedure and patient is discharged on the same day evening. Endoscopic DCR is considered to be a superior alternative technique to the conventional external DCR. Patients diagnosed with nasolacrimal duct obstruction between Jan 2009 and Jan 2011 were included in the study. One hundred and twenty endo DCR were performed with conventional ‘cold steel’ instruments. The technique involved complete exposure and marsupialization of the lacrimal sac. The surgical technique involved the creation of nasal mucosal and large posterior lacrimal flaps at the medial lacrimal sac wall and the two flaps were placed in close apposition. Success was defined as complete resolution of epiphora and a patent lacrimal system, evaluated by lacrimal irrigation and endoscopy, 1 year postoperatively.

Keywords

Chronic dacryocystitis Sac syringing Mucosal preservation technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, Pukka P, Seppa H, Grenman R (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 108:1861–1866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eloy PH, Bertrand B, Martinez M, Hoebeke M (1995) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results. Rhinology 33:229–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P (1993) Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 7(54):5–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibrahim HA, Noble JL, Batterbury M, Johnson CP, Williams R (2001) Endoscopic guided trephination dacryocystorhinostomy (Hesham DCR): technique and pilot trial. Opthalmology 108:2337–2346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seppa Heikki, Grenman Reider, Hartikinen Jouko (1994) Endonasal CO2-Nd: YAG laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Opthalmologica 72:703–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garfin SW (1942) Etiology of dacryocystitis and epiphora. Arch Opthalmol 27:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ (2003) Endonasal dacaryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flap. Am J Opthalmol 135:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuen KS, Lam LY, Tse MW, Chan DD, Wong BW, Chann WM (2004) Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal sac flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hongkong Med J 10:394–400Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolman PJ (2003) Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with non laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Opthalmology 110:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sonkhya N, Mishra P (2009) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy with nasal mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap. J Laryngol Otol 123:320–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mann BS, Wormald PJ (2006) Endoscopic assessment of the dacryocystorhinostomy ostium after endoscopic surgery. Laryngoscope 116:1172–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wormald PJ (2002) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 112:69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniruddha Majumder
    • 1
  • Mukesh Singh
    • 1
  • Chiranjib Das
    • 1
  • Saumik Das
    • 1
  • Tapan kanti Hazra
    • 1
  1. 1.Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital (NRSMCH)KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations