Advertisement

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Flap Suturing

  • Milind V. Kirtane
  • Abhineet LallEmail author
  • Kashmira Chavan
  • Dhruv Satwalekar
Original Article

Abstract

Multiple reports have demonstrated the efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). However the results of the same have varied from centre to centre. Many still regard external DCR as the gold standard. To describe an endoscopic DCR technique which anatomically simulates an external DCR and assess its results. Prospective, nonrandomized and noncomparative interventional case series. Clinical charts of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction based on symptomatic, clinical and radiological basis were included in the study. All surgeries were done endonasally using standard operative technique. The modification in the standard technique included creating a wide exposure of the lacrimal sac, incising the sac and the suturing the medial wall of the lacrimal sac with the lateral nasal wall. The same was achieved by using either vascular clips or 5.0 vicryl sutures. Twenty (11 females and 9 males) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 56.86 years old (range 27–85 years old). The main presenting symptom was epiphora and 1 patient with mucocele. Successful outcome was measured in terms of relief of sympto anatomical patency assessed by sac syringing and nasal endoscopy showing a wide patent lumen. A primary success rate of 95% and ultimate rate of 100% was achieved in the cases with a nasolacrimal duct (NLD) block while an overall success rate of 82.6% was noted when the cases with NLD block and common canalicular block were considered together. Endoscopic DCR can now easily replace external DCR as a standard. It is not only minimally invasive, but has minimal complications and using this technique, we have been able to achieve very high success rates.

Keywords

Endoscopic surgical procedure Dacrycystorhinostomy Lacrimal apparatus Lacrimal duct obstruction Lacrimal gland Dacryocystitis Lacrimal apparatus disease Lacrimal Lacrimal duct Mucocele 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 38078 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ (2003) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flap. Am J Opthalmol 135:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caldwell GW (1893) Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi, and with an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. Am J Opthalmol 10:189–193Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDonough M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Onceri M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoglu O, Irkec M (2000) Long term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yuen KSC, Lam LYM, Tse MWY, Chan DDN, Won BWC, Chan WM (2004) Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal sac flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hong Kong Med J 10:394–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Opthalmol 86:792–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leong SC, Karkos PD, Burgess P, Halliwell M, Hampal SA (2010) Comparison of outcomes between nonlaser endoscopic endonasal and external dacryocystorhiostomy: single centre experience and a review of British trends. Am J Otolaryngol 31:32–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozgur Y, Mehmet S, Umit T, Serdar C, Kadir E, Murat Y (2007) External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results. Eur Arch Oto rhino laryngol 264:879–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jha KN, Ramalingam WVBS (2009) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a retrospective study. MJAFI 65:23–25Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jim HR, Yeon JY, Cho MJ (2006) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: creation of large marsulialized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci 21:719–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liao SL, Kao SC, Tseng JH, Chen Hou PK (2000) Results of intraoperative mitomycin c application in dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Opthalmol 84:903–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selig YK, Biesman BS, Rebeiz EE (2000) Topical application of mitomycin c in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 14:205–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zilelioglu G, Ugurbas SH, Anadolu Y, Akmer M, Akturk T (1998) Adjunctive use of mitomycin c on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Opthalmol 82:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deka A, Bhattacharjee K, Bhuyan SK, Bhattacharjee H, Khaund G (2006) Effect of mitomycin c on ostium in dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Opthalmol 34:557–561Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Unlu HH, Gunhan K, Baser EF, Songu M (2009) Long term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinosotmy: Is intubation really required? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:589–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milind V. Kirtane
    • 1
  • Abhineet Lall
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Kashmira Chavan
    • 1
  • Dhruv Satwalekar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.P D Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, MahimMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Cumballa Hill HospitalMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Kirtane ClinicMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations