Skip to main content
Log in

Modified soccer game optimization and its application on power flow and distribution generation placement problems of distribution systems

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distribution power flow (DPF) and distribution generation (DG) placement are important problems in modern distribution systems (DSs). The DPF problem is modelled as an optimization problem of minimizing the node power mismatches, while considering the corrections of node voltages as solution variables. The node locations and DG ratings of DG placement (DGP) problem are considered as optimization parameters with an objective of minimizing the network loss (NL). The soccer game optimization (SGO) models the movements of soccer game players by "move-off" and "move-forward" phases, and has the drawback of performing simple arithmetic average for representing random stochastic movements of players during its "move-forward" phase. This paper endeavours to first remodel the move-forward phase by adapting Levy Flight mechanism to simulate the random jumping action of players to a long distance in getting the ball and scoring a goal, and then develop new modified SGO (MSGO) based methods for solving the formulated DPF and DGP problems. The simulation study exhibited that the proposed DPF method is 751 and 666 times faster than the NR PF technique and the DGP method is able to save the NL by 65% and 69% for 33 and 69 node systems respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BBO:

Biogeography based optimization

DDPF:

Decoupled DPF

DG:

Distribution generation

DGP:

DG placement

DPF:

Distribution PF

DS:

Distribution systems

FACTS:

Flexible AC transmission systems

FBS:

Forward and backward sweeps

FCPF:

Feeder current based PF

FDGPS:

Flower pollination based DGP scheme

FF:

Fitness function

HCACO:

Hyper cube-ant colony optimization

MPGSA:

Modified plant growth simulation algorithm

MSGO:

Modified SGO

MSGO-DPF:

MSGO based DPF

MSGO-DGP:

MSGO based DGP

NL:

Network loss

NR:

Newton-Raphson

PF:

Power flow

SA-HSO:

Sensitivity analysis and harmony search optimization

SFLO:

Shuffled frog leap optimization

SGO:

Soccer game optimization

TL-GWO:

Teaching–learning and grey wolf based optimization

UVDA:

Uniform voltage distribution based algorithm

VRDPF:

Voltage regulation based DPF

A:

Active team

B:

Substitute team

\(D\) :

Ball dribbler

\(i_{qp}\) and \(i_{qp}^{\max }\) :

Feeder current from node-q to node-p and its limit respectively

\(na\) and \(nb\) :

Number of active and substitute players respectively

\(ng\) :

Number of DG units

\(nn\) :

Number of nodes

\(N_{p}\) :

Node location of pth DG unit

\(nsv\) :

Number of solution variables

\(P_{G,p}\) :

Real power generation of pth DG unit

\(P_{L,p}\) :

Real power load at node-p

\(P_{i}^{sp}\) and \(Q_{i}^{sp}\) :

Specified real and reactive powers at node-i respectively

\(P_{i}^{cal}\) and \(Q_{i}^{cal}\) :

Calculated real and reactive node powers at node-i respectively

\(rand\) :

Random number (0, 1)

\(S^{D}\) :

Position of ball dribbler

\(S^{D} (t)\) :

Position of the ball dribbler at instant-t

\(S^{i}\) :

Position ith soccer game player

\(S^{i} (t)\) :

\(S^{i}\) At instant-t

\(S_{mem}^{i}\) :

Best memorized position of \(S^{i}\)

\(S_{mem}^{i} (t)\) :

\(S_{mem}^{i}\) At instant-t

T :

Maximum number of iterations

\(t\) :

Iteration counter

\(U_{j}\) and \(L_{j}\) :

Upper and lower limits of jth solution variable respectively

\(V\) :

Vector of node voltage magnitudes

\(V^{o}\) :

Initial values for \(V\)

\(Y_{ij} \angle \theta_{ij}\) :

Element of node admittance matrix corresponding to ith row and jth column

\(\beta_{1} ,\;\beta_{2} ,\;{\text{and}}\;\beta_{3}\) :

Weight parameters

\(\gamma\) :

A scaling factor that controls the step size \(ss\)

\(\sigma\) :

A Constant

\(\eta\) :

Probability factor for replacing an active player by a substitute player

\(\theta\) :

A constant

\(\rho_{1} ,\rho_{2}\) :

Switch probability parameters

\(\delta\) :

Vector of node voltage angles

\(\delta^{o}\) :

Vector of initial node voltage angles

\(\Im\) :

Levy flight

\(\Phi (\sigma )\) :

A gamma function

\(\Psi^{DPF}\) :

Cost function of the DPF problem

\(\Psi^{DGP}\) :

Cost function of the DGP problem

\(\psi_{1}\) and \(\psi_{2}\) :

Penalty factors

\(\Im\) :

A set of feeders, whose currents violate the respective limit

\(\Delta P_{i}\) and \(\Delta Q_{i}\) :

Real and reactive power mismatches at node-i respectively

\(\Delta V\) :

Correction vector of node voltage magnitudes

\(\Delta V_{i}\) :

Voltage magnitude of ith node

\(\Delta \delta\) :

Correction vector of node voltage angles

\(\Delta \delta_{i}\) :

Voltage angle of ith node

\(\Delta \delta^{net}\) and \(\Delta V^{net}\) :

Vector of net required corrections of node voltage angles and node voltage magnitudes respectively

References

  1. Memon Z, Trinchero R, Xie Y et al (2020) An iterative scheme for the power-flow analysis of distribution networks based on decoupled circuit equivalents in the phasor domain. Energies 13:386. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shirmohammadi D, Hong H, Semlyen A, Luo G (1988) A compensation-based power flow method for weakly meshed distribution and transmission networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3:753–762. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.192932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aravindhababu P, Ganapathy S, Nayar K (2001) A novel technique for the analysis of radial distribution systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 23:167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-0615(00)00048-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aravindhababu P, Ashokkumar R (2008) A fast decoupled power flow for distribution systems. Electr Power Compon Syst 36:932–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000801960598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aravindhababu P, Ashokkumar R (2011) A robust decoupled power flow for distribution systems. Energy Convers Manage 52:1930–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan Y, Liao C, Li Y et al (2020) A linear power flow model for balanced distribution network with droop-controlled DSTATCOM and voltage controlled DG. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 117:105665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gianto R (2020) Three-phase distribution system load flow analysis using sequence components. Eur J Electr Eng Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejece.2020.4.4.232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sangamesh YG, Suresh HJ (2020) High tension voltage regulation based power flow analysis of radial distribution network. Int J Eng Sci Manag—Multidiscip Publ VTU 2(2):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shakil M, Rashid Z, Hussain G, Umer F (2020) Power flow analysis and optimization in ring distribution network of Bahawalpur using Newton Raphson method. Indian J Sci Technol 13(27):2720–2732. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v13i27.916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Portelinha RK, Durce CC, Tortelli OL, Lourenço EM (2021) Fast-decoupled power flow method for integrated analysis of transmission and distribution systems. Electr Power Syst Res 196:107215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molaee ZS, Rokrok E, Doostizadeh M (2021) A unified power flow approach using VSC-efficiency for AC–DC distribution systems operating at grid connected and islanded modes. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 130:106906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao R, Ravindra K, Satish K, Narasimham S (2013) power loss minimization in distribution system using network reconfiguration in the presence of distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2197227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manas RN (2014) Optimal feeder reconfiguration of distributed system with distributed generation units using HC-ACO. Int J Electr Eng Inform 6(1):107–128. https://doi.org/10.15676/ijeei.2014.6.1.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajaram R, Sathish Kumar K, Rajasekar N (2015) Power system reconfiguration in a radial distribution network for reducing losses and to improve voltage profile using modified plant growth simulation algorithm with Distributed Generation (DG). Energy Rep 1:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mythili S, Thiyagarajah K, Rajesh P, Shajin FH (2020) Ideal position and size selection of unified power flow controllers (UPFCs) to upgrade the dynamic stability of systems: an antlion optimiser and invasive weed optimisation algorithm. HKIE Trans 27(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.33430/V27N1THIE-2018-0024

  16. AruulVizhiy S, Santhi R, Nachiappan A (2016) Biogeography based optimization for multi-objective reconfiguration problem in distribution networks. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i13/87498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajesh P, Shajin F (2020) A multi-objective hybrid algorithm for planning electrical distribution system. Eur J Electr Eng 22(4–5):224–509. https://doi.org/10.18280/ejee.224-509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bayat A, Bagheri A, Noroozian R (2016) Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generation accompanied by reconfiguration of distribution networks for maximum loss reduction by using a new UVDA-based heuristic method. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77:360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shajin F, Rajesh P (2020) Trusted Secure Geographic Routing Protocol: outsider attack detection in mobile ad hoc networks by adopting trusted secure geographic routing protocol. Int J Pervasive Comput Commun ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpcc-09-2020-0136

  20. ArabiNowdeh S, Davoudkhani I, HadidianMoghaddam M et al (2019) Fuzzy multi-objective placement of renewable energy sources in distribution system with objective of loss reduction and reliability improvement using a novel hybrid method. Appl Soft Comput 77:761–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thota MK, Shajin FH, Rajesh P (2020) Survey on software defect prediction techniques. Int J Appl Sci Eng 17:331–344. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202012_17(4).331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siahbalaee J, Rezanejad N, Gharehpetian G (2019) Reconfiguration and DG sizing and placement using improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm. Electr Power Compon Syst 47:1475–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2019.1689449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raut U, Mishra S (2020) A new Pareto multi-objective sine cosine algorithm for performance enhancement of radial distribution network by optimal allocation of distributed generators. Evol Intel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00428-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yogambari V, Aravindhababu P (2021) Flower pollination based optimal placement of distributed generation units in distribution networks. Int J Energy Technol Policy, in print

  25. Kawambwa S, Hamisi N, Mafole P, Kundaeli H (2021) A cloud model based symbiotic organism search algorithm for DG allocation in radial distribution network. Evol Intel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00529-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Avar A, El-Eslami MKS (2021) Optimal DG placement in power markets from DG Owners’ perspective considering the impact of transmission costs. Electr Power Syst Res 196:107218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Melo DM, Lopes EC, Motta JG, Asano R, Valverde M, Suyama R, Benedito RS, Leite PT, Lima GSC (2021) Integrated intelligent geoprocessing tool for screening candidate locations suitable for Distributed Generation Deployment. Renew Energy 177:797–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nayyar A, Nguyen NG (2018) Introduction to swarm intelligence. Advances in swarm intelligence for optimizing problems in computer science 53–78, 1st Edition, CRC Press

  29. Nayyar A, Le DN, Nguyen NG (2018) Advances in swarm intelligence for optimizing problems in computer science, 1st edn. CRC Press

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Purnomo H, Wee H (2015) Soccer game optimization with substitute players. J Comput Appl Math 283:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.01.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Baran M, Wu F (1989) Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Power Eng Rev 9:101–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/mper.1989.4310642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kashem M, Ganapathy V, Jasmon G (2001) A geometrical approach for network reconfiguration based loss minimization in distribution systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 23(4):295–304. For network reconfiguration based loss minimization in distribution systems. Int. J Elect Power Energy Syst., 23(4):295–304.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yogambari Venkatesan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatesan, Y., Srilakshmi, K. & Palanivelu, A. Modified soccer game optimization and its application on power flow and distribution generation placement problems of distribution systems. Evol. Intel. 16, 539–552 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00677-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00677-9

Keywords

Navigation