The hologenome concept: we need to incorporate function
- 859 Downloads
Are we in the midst of a paradigm change in biology and have animals and plants lost their individuality, i.e., are even so-called ‘typical’ organisms no longer organisms in their own right? Is the study of the holobiont—host plus its symbiotic microorganisms—no longer optional, but rather an obligatory path that must be taken for a comprehensive understanding of the ecology and evolution of the individual components that make up a holobiont? Or are associated microbes merely a component of their host’s environment, and the holobiont concept is just a beautiful idea that does not add much or anything to our understanding of evolution? This article explores different aspects of the concept of the holobiont. We focus on the aspect of functional integration, a central holobiont property, which is only rarely considered thoroughly. We conclude that the holobiont comes in degrees, i.e., we regard the property of being a holobiont as a continuous trait that we term holobiontness, and that holobiontness is differentiated in several dimensions. Although the holobiont represents yet another level of selection (different from classical individual or group selection because it acts on a system that is composed of multiple species), it depends on the grade of functional integration whether or not the holobiont concept helps to cast light on the various degrees of interactions between symbiotic partners.
KeywordsHolobiont Hologenome Symbiosis Evolution Function Functional integration
Support by the Münster Graduate School of Evolution (MGSE) to DF, KF, and GL is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by Santander Universities with a fellowship to JG for his stay (19.05-15.08.2014) in the Evolution Think Tank of the MGSE. This manuscript was conceived during a workshop on Multilevel Selection at the MGSE and owes much to the inspiring discussions with Seth Bordenstein who was one of the invited participants.
- Bordenstein SR, Theis KR (2015) Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol 13(8): e1002226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226
- Finegold SM, Sutter VL, Mathisen GE (1983) Human intestinal microflora in health and disease. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Griesemer JR (2014) Reproduction and the scaffolded development of hybrids. In: Caporael LRGJR, Wimsatt WC (eds) Developing scaffolding in evolution, cognition and culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 23–55Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Leggat W et al. (2007) The hologenome theory disregards the coral holobiont Nat Rev Microbiol 5. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1635-c1
- Margulis L (1970) Origin of eukaryotic cells. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Margulis L (2003) Symbiosis in cell evolution. W. H. Freeman & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Millikan RG (1984) Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism Bradford/MIT Press. Mass, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Peeters C (1997) In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Theis KR et al (2016) Getting the hologenome concept right: an eco-evolutionary framework for hosts and their microbiomes. mSystems 1(2):e00028-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00028-16