Advertisement

Theory in Biosciences

, Volume 129, Issue 2–3, pp 103–111 | Cite as

Punctuated equilibrium in a neontological context

  • Melanie J. Monroe
  • Folmer BokmaEmail author
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

The theory of punctuated equilibrium, which proposes that biological species evolve rapidly when they originate rather than gradually over time, has sparked intense debate between palaeontologists and evolutionary biologists about the mode of character evolution and the importance of natural selection. Difficulty in interpreting the fossil record prevented consensus, and it remains disputed as to what extent gradual change in established species is responsible for phenotypic differences between species. Against the historical background of the concept of evolution concentrated in speciation events, we review attempts to investigate tempo and mode of evolution using present-day species since the introduction of the theory of punctuated equilibrium in 1972. We discuss advantages, disadvantages, and prospects of using neontological data, methodological advances, and the findings of some recent studies.

Keywords

Extinction Macroevolution Microevolution Speciation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Avise JC, Ayala FJ (1975) Genetic change and rates of cladogenesis. Genetics 81:757–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC, Smith JJ, Ayala FJ (1975) Adaptive differentiation with little genetic change between two native California minnows. Evolution 29:411–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak P, Sneppen K (1993) Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Phys Rev Lett 71:4083–4086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bokma F (2002) Detection of punctuated equilibrium from molecular phylogenies. J Evol Biol 15:1048–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bokma F (2003) Testing for differences in rates of speciation between higher taxa. Evolution 57:2469–2474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokma F (2004) Differential rates of morphological divergence in birds. J Evol Biol 17:933–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bokma F (2008) Detection of “Punctuated Equilibrium” by Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction rates, ancestral character states, and rates of anagenetic and cladogenetic evolution of a molecular phylogeny. Evolution 62:2718–2726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradshaw HD Jr, Wilbert SM, Otto KG, Schemske DW (1995) Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush GL, Case SM, Wilson AC, Patton JL (1977) Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3942–3946CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlesworth B (1982) Hopeful monsters cannot fly. Paleobiology 8:469–474Google Scholar
  11. Coyne JA (1995) Speciation in monkeyflowers. Nature 376:726–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crispo E (2007) The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: revising two mechanisms of evolutionary change mediated by phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 61:2469–2479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De Vries H (1901) Die Mutationstheorie. Versuche und Beobachtungen über die Entstehung von Arten im Pflanzenreich. Veit & Co, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  14. Eldredge N (1971) The allopatric model and phylogeny in paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution 25:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eldredge N (2000) The pattern of evolution. W.H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Company, San Fransisco, pp 82–115Google Scholar
  17. Eldredge N, Thompson JN, Brakefield PM, Gavrilets S, Jablonski D, Jackson JBC, Lenski RE, Lieberman BS, McPeek MA, Miller W III (2005) The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology 31:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Futuyma DJ (1987) On the role of species in anagenesis. Am Nat 130:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Futuyma DJ (1997) Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M (1997) Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  22. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) “Exaptation”—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15Google Scholar
  23. Hansen TF, Houle D (2004) Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. In: Pigliucci M, Preston K (eds) Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 130–150Google Scholar
  24. Kohne DE, Chiscon JA, Moyer BH (1972) Evolution of primate DNA sequences. J Hum Evol 1:627–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kritsky G (1991) Darwin’s Madagascan Hawk Moth prediction. Am Entomol 37:206–209Google Scholar
  26. Lind MI, Johansson F (2007) The degree of adaptive phenotypic plasticity is correlated with the special environmental heterogeneity experienced by island populations of Rana temporaria. J Evol Biol 20:1288–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liow LH, Fortelius M, Bingham E, Lintulaakso K, Mannila H, Flynn L, Stenseth NC (2008) Higher origination and extinction rates in larger mammals. PNAS 105:6097–6102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mattila TM, Bokma F (2008) Extant mammal body masses suggest punctuated equilibrium. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2195–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr E (1954) Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 157–180Google Scholar
  31. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayr E (1982) Speciation and macroevolution. Evolution 36:1119–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monroe MJ, Bokma F (2009) Do speciation rates drive rates of body size evolution in mammals? Am Nat 174:912–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mooers AO, Vamosi SM, Schluter D (1999) Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). Am Nat 154:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nee S, May R, Harvey P (1994) The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 344:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oakley TH, Gu Z, Abouheif E, Patel NH, Li WH (2005) Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: an example using yeast functional genomic data. Mol Biol Evol 22:40–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Purvis A (2004) Evolution: how do characters evolve? Nature 432:1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricklefs RE (2004) Cladogenesis and morphological diversification in passerine birds. Nature 430:338–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ridley M (2004) Evolution, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Company, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. Rundle HD, Nosil P (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8:336–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode of evolution. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SK M, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84:3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanley SM (1975) A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:646–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stanley SM (1998) Macroevolution: pattern and process. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  45. Stebbins GL, Ayala FJ (1981) Is a new evolutionary synthesis necessary? Science 213:967–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Templeton AR (1982) Why read Goldschmidt? Paleobiology 8:474–481Google Scholar
  47. Wake DB, Roth G, Wake M (1983) On the problem of stasis in organismal evolution. J Theor Biol 101:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webster AJ, Payne RJH, Pagel M (2003) Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation. Science 301:478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Whittall JB, Hodges SA (2007) Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 477:706–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams GC (1992) Natural selection: domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options