Advertisement

Theory in Biosciences

, Volume 129, Issue 2–3, pp 89–96 | Cite as

Playing Darwin. Part A. Experimental Evolution in Drosophila

  • Margarida MatosEmail author
Original Paper
First Online:
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

In 2009 we celebrate Charles Darwin’s second centenary, and 150 years since the publication of ‘The Origin of Species’. After so many years, what has changed in the way we understand Evolution? Obviously we have now a full understanding of the mechanisms underlying heritability. Many molecular tools are available, allowing among other things to reconstruct more accurately the evolutionary history of species and use a comparative approach to infer evolutionary processes. But we can also study evolution in action. Such studies—Experimental Evolution—help us to characterize in detail the evolutionary processes and patterns as a function of environmental challenges, the previous history and present state of populations, and the interactions between such factors. We have now a wide variety of organisms that have been studied with this approach, exploring a diversity of potentialities, in biological characteristics and genetic tools, and covering a variety of evolutionary questions. In this short article I will illustrate the potentialities of Experimental Evolution, focusing in three studies in Drosophila. These and other studies of Experimental Evolution illustrate that Evolution is often local, involving complex patterns and processes, which lead both to specific adaptations and to biological diversity, as Darwin already stated clearly in ‘The Origin of Species’.

Keywords

Darwin Experimental Evolution Adaptation Drosophila 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank all my dedicated students that have collaborated throughout the years in my long-term projects of laboratory adaptation, Michael R. Rose for mentorship and Teresa Avelar for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. My research has been financed by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) project POCTI/BSE/33673/2000, by FCT and POCI 2010 project POCI-PPCDT/BIA-BDE/55853/2004 (both with co-participation of FEDER) and by FCT project PTDC/BIA-BDE/65733/2006.

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Avelar T, Matos M, Rego C (2004) Quem tem medo de Charles Darwin? O problema da selecção natural. Colecção Mosaicos da Ciência. Editora Relógio d’ Água, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC (2004) Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton NH, Briggs DEG, Eisen JA, Goldstein DB, Patel NH (2007) Evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell G (2008) Selection: the mechanism of evolution, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chippindale AK (2006) Experimental evolution. In: Fox C, Wolf J (eds) Evolutionary genetics: concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 482–501Google Scholar
  6. Clayton GA, Robertson A (1957) An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. II. The long-term effects of selection. J Genet 55:152–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohan FM, Hoffmann AA (1986) Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines. Genetics 114:145–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky T (1943) Genetics of natural populations IX. Temporal changes in the composition of populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 28:162–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobzhansky T (1947) Genetics of natural populations. XIV. A response of certain gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura to natural selection. Genetics 32:142–160Google Scholar
  11. Frankham R (2005) Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics. J Evol Biol 18:750–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Futuyma DJ (2006) Evolutionary biology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Garland T, Rose MR (eds) (2009) Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications of selection experiments. University of California Press, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  14. Gayon J (1998) Darwinism’s struggle for survival: heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant PR, Grant BR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin finches. Science 296:707–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann AA, Hallas R, Sinclair C, Partridge L (2001) Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture. Evolution 55:436–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM, Weeks A (2004) Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:482–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi A, Castillo RB, Mueller LD (2003) The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution. J Genet 82:147–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauder GV, Leroi AM, Rose MR (1993) Adaptations and history. Trends Ecol Evol 8:294–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenski R (2004) Phenotypic and genomic evolution during a 20,000-generation experiment with the bacterium Escherichia coli. Plant Breed Rev 24(2):225–265Google Scholar
  23. Lewontin RC, Moore JA, Provine WB, Wallace B (eds) (1981) Dobzhansky’s genetics of natural populations I–XLIII. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Li W-H (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Matos M, Rose MR, Rocha Pité MT, Rego C, Avelar T (2000) Adaptation to the laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J Evol Biol 13:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matos M, Avelar T, Rose MR (2002) Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J Evol Biol 15:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matos M, Simões P, Duarte A, Rego C, Avelar T, Rose MR (2004) Convergence to a novel environment—comparative method versus experimental evolution. Evolution 58(7):1503–1510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Prasad NG, Joshi A (2003) What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us? J Genetics 82:45–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2005) Selection in nature: experimental manipulations of natural populations. Integr Comp Biol 45:456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934–1937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rice WR, Salt GW (1990) The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: experimental evidence. Evolution 44:1140–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rose MR (1984) Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:1004–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose MR (1991) Evolutionary biology of aging. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose MR, Matos M (2004) The creation of methuselah flies by laboratory evolution. In: Rose MR, Passananti HB, Matos M (eds) Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of aging. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose MR, Oakley TH (2007) The new biology: beyond the modern synthesis. Biol Direct 2:30. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-2-30 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose MR, Nusbaum TJ, Chippindale AK (1996) Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire cat syndrome. In: Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) Adaptation. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–241Google Scholar
  37. Rose MR, Passananti HB, Matos M (eds) (2004) Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of aging. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose MR, Passananti HB, Chippindale AK, Phelan JP, Matos M, Teotónio H, Mueller LD (2005) The effects of evolution are local: evidence from experimental evolution in Drosophila. Integr Comp Biol 45(3):486–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose MR, Rauser CL, Benford G, Matos M, Mueller LD (2007) Hamilton’s forces of natural selection after forty years. Evolution 61:1265–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubin GM, Lewis E (2000) A brief history of Drosophila’s contributions to genome research. Science 287:2216–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Simões P, Rose MR, Duarte A, Gonçalves R, Matos M (2007) Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. J Evol Biol 20:758–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Simões P, Santos J, Fragata I, Mueller LD, Rose MR, Matos M (2008a) How repeatable is adaptive evolution? The role of geographical origin and founder effects in laboratory adaptation. Evolution 62:1817–1829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Simões P, Pascual M, Santos J, Rose MR, Matos M (2008b) Evolutionary dynamics of molecular markers during local adaptation: a case study in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol Biol 8:66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Simões P, Santos J, Matos M (2009). Experimental evolutionary domestication. In: Garland T, Rose MR (eds) Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications of selection experiments. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, pp 89–110Google Scholar
  45. Teotónio H, Rose MR (2000) Variation in the reversibility of evolution. Nature 408:463–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Travisano M, Mongold JA, Bennett AF, Lenski RE (1995) Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 267:87–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Biologia AmbientalFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options