Theory in Biosciences

, 128:227 | Cite as

What makes some species of milk snakes more attractive to humans than others?

Original Paper

Abstract

Animals are ancestrally important stimuli for humans who pay disproportional attention to animal objects and exhibit an outstanding ability to categorize animal species, especially those most relevant to them. Humans as well as other primates perceive snakes as ambivalent stimuli that elicit unspecific arousal and attention. We assessed human aesthetic preferences toward milk snakes, the traditional model for studies of Batesian mimicry. The genus is fairly uniform in size and shape, but includes a great variety of color forms; some possessing aposematic patterns while others being rather cryptic. This provides an opportunity to test which features are responsible for positive aesthetic evaluation of the species. We asked the respondents to rank 34 pictures of milk snakes according to perceived beauty. The sets (whole bodies, heads, and skin fragments) covered most of naturally occurring variation in milk snake appearance. While ranking the beauty, the respondents spontaneously classified the species according to two dimensions. In each set, one of the dimensions corresponds to perceived beauty. The respondents’ ranking revealed several distinct clusters of species instead of a continuous gradient. The species clustered in a similar way irrespective of evaluated set. One dimension of the ranking associated with the relative representation of red color and the number of transversal stripes, the other corresponded to a low proportion of red and a high proportion of black color. When the whole body of the snake is evaluated, aposematic coloration contributes to its perceived beauty. In conclusion, humans showed a surprising ability to classify milk snake patterns; they repeatedly formed the same distinct groups of species, thus completing a process that resembles unsupervised categorization.

Keywords

Human cognition Aesthetic preferences Categorization Aposematic signal Mimicry Lampropeltis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic project no. IAA 6011410803. Personal costs of J.M. were covered from the grant no.206-05-H012 provided by the Czech Science Foundation. Participation of E.L. was supported by institutional grant no. 0021620828, provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic.

References

  1. Anderson JR (1991) The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychol Rev 98:409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates HW (1981) Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera, Heliconidae). Biol J Linn Soc 16:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty CD, Beirinckx K, Sherratt TN (2004) The evolution of mullerian mimicry in multispecies communities. Nature 431:63–67. doi:10.1038/nature02818 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckers GJL, Leenders TAAM, Strijbosch H (1996) Coral snake mimicry: live snakes not avoided by a mammalian predator. Oecologia 106:461–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification—principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlin B, Kay P (1969) Universality and evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodie ED (1993) Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa-Rica. Evolution 47:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodie ED, Brodie ED Jr (2004) Venomous snake mimikry. In: Campbell JA, Lamar WW (eds) The venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Comstock Publishing Associates: A Division of Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 617–633Google Scholar
  9. Brodie ED, Janzen FJ (1995) Experimental studies of coral snake mimicry—generalized avoidance of ringed snake patterns by free-ranging avian predators. Funct Ecol 9:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buasso CM, Leynaud GC, Cruz FB (2006) Predation on snakes of Argentina: effects of coloration and ring pattern on coral and false coral snakes. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 41:183–188. doi:10.1080/01650520600630725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clara E, Tommasi L, Rogers LJ (2008) Social mobbing calls in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): effects of experience and associated cortisol levels. Anim Cogn 11:349–358. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0125-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coss RG, McCowan B, Ramakrishnan U (2007) Threat-related acoustical differences in alarm calls by wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) elicited by python and leopard models. Ethology 113:352–367. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01336.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dedrick D (2005) Explanation and color-naming research. Cross Cult Res 39:111–133. doi:10.1177/1069397104273627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dulai KS, von Dornum M, Mollon JD, Hunt DM (1999) The evolution of trichromatic color vision by opsin gene duplication in New World and Old World primates. Genome Res 9:629–638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Greene HW, Mcdiarmid RW (1981) Coral snake mimicry—does it occur. Science 213:1207–1212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffin LD (2006) Optimality of the basic colour categories for classification. J R Soc Interface 3:71–85. doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gursky S (2005) Predator mobbing in Tarsius spectrum. Int J Primatol 26:207–221. doi:10.1007/s10764-005-0731-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gursky S (2006) Function of snake mobbing in spectral tarsiers. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:601–608. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20364 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutberlet LR Jr, Harvey MB (2004) The evolution of New World venomous snakes. In: Campbell JA, Lamar WW (eds) The venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Comstock Publishing Associates: A Division of Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 634–682Google Scholar
  20. Hinman KE, Throop HL, Adams KL, Dake AJ, McLauchlan KK, Mckone MJ (1997) Predation by free-ranging birds on partial coral snake mimics: the importance of ring width and color. Evolution 51:1011–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hiramatsu C, Tsutsui T, Matsumoto Y, Aureli F, Fedigan LM, Kawamura S (2005) Color vision polymorphism in wild capuchins (Cebus capucinus) and spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Costa Rica. Am J Primatol 67(4):447–461. doi:10.1002/ajp.20199 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt M, Bylsma L, Brock J, Fenton M, Goldberg A, Miller R, Tran T, Urgelles J (2006) The role of imagery in the maintenance and treatment of snake fear. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 37:283–298. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2005.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Isbell LA (2006) Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. J Hum Evol 51:1–35. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs GH (2007) New World monkeys and color. Int J Primatol 28:729–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs GH, Neitz J (1987) Inheritance of color-vision in a New-World monkey (Saimiri, Sciureus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2545–2549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs GH, Neitz M, Deegan JF, Neitz J (1996) Trichromatic colour vision in New World monkeys. Nature 382:156–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jameson KA (2005a) On the role of culture in color naming: remarks on the articles of Paramei, Kay, Roberson, and Hardin on the topic of cognition, culture, and color experience. Cross Cult Res 39:88–106. doi:10.1177/1069398104267886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jameson KA (2005b) Why GRUE? An interpoint-distance model analysis of composite color categories. Cross Cult Res 39:159–204. doi:10.1177/1069397104273766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kay P (2005) Color categories are not arbitrary. Cross Cult Res 39:39–55. doi:10.1177/1069397104267889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lobue V, DeLoache JS (2008) Detecting the snake in the grass—attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychol Sci 19:284–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Malt BC (1995) Category coherence in cross-cultural-perspective. Cogn Psychol 29:85–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marešová J, Frynta D (2008) Noah’s Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: the case of bold snakes in zoos. Ecol Econ 64:554–558. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marešová J, Krása A, Frynta D (2009) We all appreciate the same animals: cross-cultural comparison of human aesthetic preferences for snake species in Papua New Guinea and Europe. Ethology 115:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markel RG (1994) Das Grosse Buch des Königsnattern. [The great book about Milk snakes]. Bede Verlag GmbH, Ruhmannsfelden, Germany;T.F.H. publications Inc., Neptune City, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Medin DL, Atran S (2004) The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychol Rev 111:960–983. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.960 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mineka S, Őhman A (2002) Phobias and preparedness: the selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biol Psychiatry 52: 927–937. PII S0006-3223(02)01669-4Google Scholar
  37. Navarrete LF, Rodriguez-Acosta A (2003) Notes on the natural history of the milksnake Lampropeltis triangulum andesiana Williams, 1978 in Venezuela. Caribbean J Sci 39(2):235–236Google Scholar
  38. New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2007) Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16598–16603. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703913104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Őhman A, Mineka S (2003) The malicious serpent: snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Őhman A, Carlsson K, Lundqvist D, Ingvar M (2007) On the unconscious subcortical origin of human fear. Physiol Behav 92:180–185. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pothos EM, Chater N (2002) A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cogn Sci 26: 303–343. PII S0364-0213(02)00064-2Google Scholar
  42. Pothos EM, Close J (2008) One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach. Cognition 107:581–602. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pough FH (1988) Mimicry of vertebrates: are the rules different? Am Nat 131:67–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramakrishnan U, Coss RG, Schank J, Dharawat A, Kim S (2005) Snake species discrimination by wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Ethology 111:337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rentschler I, Juttner M, Unzicker A, Landis T (1999) Innate and learned components of human visual preference. Curr Biol 9:665–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberson D (2005) Color categories are culturally diverse in cognition as well as in language. Cross Cult Res 39:56–71. doi:10.1177/1069397104267890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe MH (2002) Trichromatic color vision in primates. News Physiol Sci 17:93–98. doi:10.1152/nips.01376.2001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders BAC, van Brakel J (1997) Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization? Behav Brain Sci 20:167–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Savage JM, Crother BI (1989) The Status of Pliocercus and Urotheca (Serpentes, Colubridae), with a review of included species of coral snake mimics. Zool J Lin Soc 95:335–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Savage JM, Slowinski JB (1992) The coloration of the venomous coral snakes (Family Elapidae) and their mimics (Families Aniliidae and Colubridae). Biol J Linn Soc 45:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Savage JM, Slowinski JB (1996) Evolution of coloration, urotomy and coral snake mimicry in the snake genus Scaphiodontophis (Serpentes: Colubridae). Biol J Linn Soc 57:129–194Google Scholar
  52. Sherratt TN, Beatty CD (2003) The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am Nat 162:377–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith SM (1975) Innate recognition of coral snake pattern by a possible avian predator. Science 187:759–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith SM (1977) Coral-snake pattern-recognition and stimulus generalization by Naive Great Kiskadees (Aves-Tyrannidae). Nature 265:535–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith SM (1980) Response of naive temperate birds to warning coloration. Am Midl Nat 103:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. StatSoft (2001) Statistica, vers.6.0. http://www.statsoft.com
  57. Surridge AK, Osorio D, Mundy NI (2003) Evolution and selection of trichromatic vision in primates. Trends Ecol Evol 18:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waters AM, Lipp OV (2008) The influence of animal fear on attentional capture by fear-relevant animal stimuli in children. Behav Res Ther 46:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.11.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Whorf BL (1956) Language, thought, and reality. Wiley, The Technology Press of M.I.T, NYGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright LM, Holborn SW, Rezutek PE (2002) An experimental test of stimulus estimation theory: danger and safety with snake phobic stimuli. Behav Res Ther 40: 911–922. PII S0005-7967(01)00078-XGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyCharles UniversityCZPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations