Advertisement

Theory in Biosciences

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Preface. Between Ernst Haeckel and the homeobox: the role of developmental biology in explaining evolution

  • Lennart OlssonEmail author
  • Uwe Hoßfeld
  • Olaf Breidbach
Original Paper

Introduction

The importance of embryonic development for evolutionary biology has been an issue ever since Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel, however, Modern Synthesis approaches to evolution have often neglected certain aspects of developmental biology or treated development as a black box (Mayr and Provine 1980; Breidbach and Ghiselin 2007a, b). Although Wallace’s statement that “problems concerned with the orderly development of the individual are unrelated to those of the evolution of organisms through time” (Wallace 1986, p. 149) is extreme, mid-twentieth century mainstream evolutionary biology did not feel much need for an integration of developmental biology into its theoretical foundations. The fact that evolutionary questions have been of interest to some developmental biologists between the era of Darwin and Haeckel and the 1980s, i.e., that modern evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-devo, as the field is often called by its practitioners, in fact has a history, has...

Keywords

Modern Synthesis Evolutionary Developmental Biology Developmental Biologist Secondary Adaptation Hopeful Monster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. HO 2143/9-1) for generous support of our research into the history of Evo-devo. Empirical Evo-devo research in LOs laboratory is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants no. OL 134/2-4 and 138/1) and by the Volkswagenstiftung.

References

  1. Arthur W (2002) The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 415:757–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breidbach O (1997) Entphysiologisierte Morphologie. Vergleichende Entwicklungsbiologie in der Nachfolge Haeckels. Theory Biosci 116:328–348Google Scholar
  3. Breidbach O, Ghiselin MT (2007a) Evolution and development: past, present, and future. Theory Biosci 125:157–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Breidbach O, Ghiselin MT (2007b) Anton Dohrn and the problems of 19th century phylogenetic morphology. Theory Biosci 125:173–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Breidbach O, Ghiselin M (eds) (2008) Fritz Müller. Für Darwin und andere Schriften zur Biologie. Olms, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Brigandt I (2006) Homology and heterochrony: the evolutionary embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer (1899–1972). J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 306B:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin C (1871) The Descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London (2 vols)Google Scholar
  8. Haeckel E (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 2 Vols. I. Allgemeine Anatomie der Organismen; II: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte der Organismen. Reimer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall BK (1984) Developmental mechanisms underlying the formation of atavisms. Biol Rev 59:89–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall BK (1995) Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat Genet 10:126–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horder TJ (2006) Gavin Rylands deBeer: how embryology foreshadowed the dilemmas of the genome. Nat Rev Genet 7:892–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossfeld U, Olsson L (2003) The road from Haeckel. The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origin of “Evo-Devo”. Biol Philos 18:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2008) Entwicklung und Evolution—ein zeitloses Thema. Praxis Naturwissenschaften (PdN) 57:4–8Google Scholar
  14. Hoßfeld U, Olsson L, Breidbach O (eds) (2003): Carl Gegenbaur and evolutionary morphology. Theory Biosci 122(2/3) (special issue) Google Scholar
  15. Jägersten G (1955) On the early phylogeny of the Metazoa. The Bilaterogastraea theory. Zool Bidr Upps 30:321–354Google Scholar
  16. Jägersten G (1959) Further remarks on the early phylogeny of the MetazoaZool. Zool Bidr Upps 33:79–108Google Scholar
  17. Jägersten G (1968) Livscykelns evolution hos Metazoa. En generell teori. Scandinavian University Books, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  18. Jägersten G (1972) Evolution of the Metazoan life cycle: a comprehensive theory. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Junker T (2004) Die zweite Darwinsche Revolution. Geschichte des Synthetischen Darwinismus in Deutschland 1924 bis 1950. Basilisken, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  20. Junker T, Hossfeld U (2001) Die Entdeckung der Evolution. Eine revolutionäre Theorie und ihre Geschichte. WBG, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  21. Laubichler MD, Maienschein J (eds) (2007) From embryology to Evo-Devo: a history of developmental biology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Levit GS, Hossfeld U, Olsson L (2004) The Integration of Darwinism and evolutionary morphology: Alexej Nikolajevich Sewertzoff (1866–1936) and the developmental basis of evolutionary change. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 302B:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levit GS, Hossfeld U, Olsson L (2006) From the “Modern Synthesis” to Cybernetics: Ivan Ivanovich Schmalhausen (1884–1963) and his research program for a synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 306B:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Love AC (2003) Evolutionary morphology: innovation and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biol Philos 18:309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Love AC (2006) Evolutionary morphology and Evo-Devo: hierarchy and novelty. Theory Biosci 124:317–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Love AC, Raff RA (2003) Knowing your ancestors: themes in the history of Evo-Devo. Evol Dev 5:327–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) (1980). The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller F (1864) Für Darwin. Engelmann, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen C (2001) Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Nielsen C, Nørrevang A (1985) The trochaea theory: an example of life cycle phylogeny. In: Conway Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platts HM (eds) The origin and relationships of lower invertebrates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 28–41Google Scholar
  31. Nöthlich R, Wetzel N, Hoßfeld U, Olsson L (2006) “Ich acquirierte das Schwein sofort, ließ dem Niederstechen die Pfoten Abhacken u. schickte doeselben an Darwin”—Der Briefwechsel von Otto Zacharias mit Ernst Haeckel (1874–1898). Ann Hist Philos Biol 11:177–248Google Scholar
  32. Olsson L (2007) A clash of traditions. Comparative and experimental embryology in Sweden as exemplified by the research of Sven Hörstadius and Gösta Jägersten. Theory Biosci 126:117–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsson L, U Hoßfeld (2007) Die Entwicklung: Die Zeit des Lebens. Ausgewählte Themen zur Geschichte der Entwicklungsbiologie. In: Höxtermann E, Hilger H (eds) Lebenswissen. Eine Einführung in die Geschichte der Biologie. Natur and Text, Rangsdorf, pp 218–243Google Scholar
  34. Olsson L, Hoßfeld U, Breidbach O (eds) (2006) From evolutionary morphology to the modern synthesis and “Evo-Devo”: historical and contemporary perspectives. Theory Biosci 124:259–420 (special issue)Google Scholar
  35. Reiß C, Springer S, Hoßfeld U, Olsson L, Levit GS (2007) Introduction to the autobiography of Julius Schaxel. Theory Biosci 126:165–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallace B (1986) Can embryologists contribute to an understanding of evolutionary mechanisms? In: Bechtel W (ed) Integrating scientific disciplines. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 149–163Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem MuseumFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.AG BiologiedidaktikFriedrich-Schiller-UniversitätJenaGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft und Technik, Ernst-Haeckel-HausFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations