Theory in Biosciences

, Volume 127, Issue 3, pp 229–240

Ethics, evolution and culture

Original Paper

Abstract

Recent work in the fields of evolutionary ethics and moral psychology appears to be converging on a single empirically- and evolutionary-based science of morality or ethics. To date, however, these fields have failed to provide an adequate conceptualisation of how culture affects the content and distribution of moral norms. This is particularly important for a large class of moral norms relating to rapidly changing technological or social environments, such as norms regarding the acceptability of genetically modified organisms. Here we suggest that a science of morality/ethics can benefit from adopting a cultural evolution or gene-culture coevolution approach, which treats culture as a second, separate evolutionary system that acts in parallel to biological/genetic evolution. This cultural evolution approach brings with it a set of established theoretical concepts (e.g. different cultural transmission mechanisms) and empirical methods (e.g. evolutionary game theory) that can significantly improve our understanding of human morality.

Keywords

Cultural evolution Cultural transmission Evolutionary ethics Evolutionary game theory Moral norms Moral philosophy Moral psychology 

References

  1. Aoki K, Wakano JY, Feldman MW (2005) The emergence of social learning in a temporally changing environment: a theoretical model. Curr Anthropol 46:334–340Google Scholar
  2. Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Guetzkow H (ed) Groups, leadership and men. Carnegie, Pittsburgh, pp 177–190Google Scholar
  3. Atran S (1998) Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav Brain Sci 21:547–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aunger R (2000) The life history of culture learning in a face-to-face society. Ethos 28:1–38Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayala FJ (2006) Biology to ethics: an evolutionist’s view of human nature. In: Boniolo G, De Anna G (eds) Evolutionary ethics and contemporary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–158Google Scholar
  7. Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley RA, Hahn MW, Shennan SJ (2004) Random drift and culture change. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1443–1450Google Scholar
  9. Binmore K (1998) Game theory and the social contract II, just playing. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bond R, Smith P (1996) Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using asch’s line judgment task. Psychol Bull 119:111–137Google Scholar
  11. Boniolo G, De Anna G (2006) Evolutionary ethics and contemporary biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson PJ (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:3531–3535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell DT (1974) Evolutionary epistemology. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court, La Salle, pp 413–463Google Scholar
  16. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:591–621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Clayton P, Schloss J (2004) Evolution and ethics. Eerdmans, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Croft W (2000) Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser MD (2006) The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol Sci 17:1082–1089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Danielson P (1992) Artificial morality: virtuous robots for virtual games. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Danielson P (1993) Personal responsibility [for global warming]. In: Hurka T, Coward H (eds) The ethics of atmospheric change. Wilfred Laurier Press, Waterloo, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  23. Danielson P (2002) Competition among cooperators: altruism and reciprocity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:7237–7242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Danielson P (2007) The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science. Behav Brain Sci 30:23–24Google Scholar
  25. Darwin C (1859/1968) The origin of species. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Darwin C (1871/2003) The descent of man. Gibson Square, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. de Waal F (1996) Good natured: the origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Devine D, Clayton L, Dunford B, Seying R, Pryce J (2001) Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychol Public Policy Law 7:622–727Google Scholar
  29. Doris J, Stich S (2006) Moral psychology: empirical approaches. In: Zalta EN (ed) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Ehrlich PR (2001) Intervening in evolution: ethics and actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5477–5480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4:457–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Feldman MW, Laland KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends Ecol Evol 11:453–457Google Scholar
  34. Fessler D, Navarrete C (2003) Meat is good to taboo: dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. J Cogn Cul 3:1–40Google Scholar
  35. Gaskell G, Allum N, Bauer M, Jackson J, Howard S, Lindsey N (2003) Climate change for biotechnology? UK public opinion 1991–2002. AgBioForum 6:55–67Google Scholar
  36. Gaskell G, Bauer M, Durant J, Allum N (1999) Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science 285:384–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gintis H (2000) Game theory evolving. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  38. Gintis H (2007) A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Behav Brain Sci 30:1–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gould JL (1986) The biology of learning. Annu Rev Psychol 37:163–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of san marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc B 205:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gray RD, Atkinson QD (2003) Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Greene J (2003) From neural is to moral ought: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nat Rev Neurosci 4:846–849PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Greene J, Haidt J (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci 6:517–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Greene J, Sommerville R, Nystrom L, Darley J, Cohen J (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293:2105–2108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gurven M, Zanolini A, Schniter E (2008) Culture sometimes matters: intra-cultural variation in pro-social behavior among Tsimane Amerindians. J Econ Behav OrganGoogle Scholar
  46. Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Haidt J (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316:998–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  50. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Hauser MD (2006a) Moral ingredients: how we evolved the capacity to do the right thing. In: Levinson SC, Jaisson P (eds) Evolution and culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 219–246Google Scholar
  52. Hauser MD (2006b) Moral minds: how nature designed a universal sense right and wrong. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Hauser MD, Young L, Cushman FA (2008) Reviving rawls’ linguistic analogy. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (eds) The biology and psychology of morality. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 107–144Google Scholar
  54. Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol Hum Behav 19:215–241Google Scholar
  55. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R, Alvard M, Barr A, Ensminger J, Henrich NS, Hill K, Gil-White F, Gurven M, Marlowe FW, Patton JQ, Tracer D (2005) “Economic Man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behav Brain Sci 28:795–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Henrich J, Gil White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige. Evol Hum Behav 22:165–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Isenberg D (1986) Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:1141–1151Google Scholar
  58. James W (1880) Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atl Mon 46:441–459Google Scholar
  59. Lenski RE, Travisano M (1994) Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial-populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:6808–6814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lipo CP, O’Brien MJ, Collard M, Shennan S (eds) (2006) Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. Aldine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Luskin RC, Fishkin JS, Jowell R (2002) Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. Br J Polit Sci 32:455–487Google Scholar
  62. MacCoun RJ (1989) Experimental research on jury decision-making. Science 244:1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Mace R, Holden CJ (2005) A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 20:116–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Mayr E, Provine W (eds) (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. McElreath R, Lubell M, Richerson PJ, Waring TM, Baum W, Edsten E, Efferson C, Paciotti B (2005) Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning. Evol Hum Behav 26:483–508Google Scholar
  67. Mesoudi A (2007) Using the methods of social psychology to study cultural evolution. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 1:35–58Google Scholar
  68. Mesoudi A (2008) A Darwinian theory of cultural evolution can promote an evolutionary synthesis for the social sciences. Biol Theory 2:263–275Google Scholar
  69. Mesoudi A, Danielson P (2007) Parallel ethical worlds: an experimental design for applied ethics. Electronic working papers Series. W. Maurice Young centre for applied ethics, University of British Columbia at http://www.gels.ethics.ubc.ca
  70. Mesoudi A, Laland KN (2007) Culturally transmitted paternity beliefs and the evolution of human mating behaviour. Proc R Soc B 274:1273–1278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2008) The cultural transmission of great basin projectile point technology I: an experimental simulation. Am Antiq 73:3–28Google Scholar
  72. Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Dunbar RIM (2006a) A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. Br J Psychol 97:405–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of the Origin of Species. Evolution 58:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2006b) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behav Brain Sci 29:329–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Mufwene SS (2001) The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  77. Muller M (1870) The science of language. Nature 1:256–259Google Scholar
  78. Nichols S (2002) On the genealogy of norms: a case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philos Sci 69:234–255Google Scholar
  79. Nitecki MH, Nitecki DV (1993) Evolutionary ethics. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  80. Norenzayan A, Atran S (2004) Cognitive and emotional processes in the cultural transmission of natural and nonnatural beliefs. In: Schaller M, Crandall C (eds) The psychological foundations of culture. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 149–169Google Scholar
  81. Norenzayan A, Atran S, Faulkner J, Schaller M (2006). Memory and mystery: the cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cogn Sci 30:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL (2003) Cladistics and archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  83. Oudeyer P, Kaplan F (2007) Language evolution as a Darwinian process: computational studies. Cogn Process 8:21–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Pitt-Rivers AL (1875) On the evolution of culture. J Anthropol Inst 4:293–308Google Scholar
  86. Plotkin H (ed) (1982) Learning, development, and culture: essays in evolutionary epistemology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Popper KR (1979) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201–206Google Scholar
  89. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  90. Richards RJ (1986) A defense of evolutionary ethics. Biol Philos 1:265–293Google Scholar
  91. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  92. Richerson PJ, Boyd R, Henrich J (2003) Cultural evolution of human cooperation. In: Hammerstein P (eds) The genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 357–388Google Scholar
  93. Ruse M, Wilson E (1986) Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy 61:173–192Google Scholar
  94. Schuppli CA, Weary DM (2007) Multiple uses of pigs: an interactive survey to assess people’s attitudes towards animal use and genetic modification. In: Moving mountains, 46th annual symposium of The association for laboratory animal science, Calgary, Alberta, 2–5 June 2007, p 30Google Scholar
  95. Singer P (1982) Ethics and sociobiology. Philos Public Aff 11:40–64Google Scholar
  96. Singer P (2005) Ethics and intuitions. J Ethics 9:331–352Google Scholar
  97. Skyrms B (1996) Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Smith EA, Winterhalder B (eds) (1992) Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  100. Sperber D, Hirschfeld LA (2004) The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends Cogn Sci 8:40–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Sripada CS, Stich S (2006) A framework for the psychology of norms. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S (eds) The innate mind: culture and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–301Google Scholar
  102. Sunstein C (2002) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10:175–195Google Scholar
  103. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433Google Scholar
  104. Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57Google Scholar
  105. Wald KD, Calhoun-Brown A (2007) Religion and politics in the United States. Rowman and Littlefield, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  106. Whitehead H (2007) Learning, climate and the evolution of cultural capacity. J Theor Biol 245:341–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wilson D, Dietrich E, Clark A (2003) On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biol Philos 18:669–681Google Scholar
  108. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  109. Winterhalder B, Smith EA (2000) Analyzing adaptive strategies: human behavioral ecology at twenty-five. Evol Anthropol 9:51–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied EthicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Social and Developmental PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations