Theory in Biosciences

, Volume 119, Issue 3–4, pp 174–186 | Cite as

The concept of the organism in physiology

Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

The growth of physiology in the 19th and 20th centuries was accompanied by the development of disciplinary boundaries between physiology and other biological sciences. Physiology became the study of the mechanisms that underlie the functions of organisms and their component parts. Concern with the internal workings of organisms has led physiologists to focus on the maintenance of homeostasis in the internal environment rather than on the interactions of organisms with their external environments. Moreover, interest in the cellular or biochemical mechanisms that underlie organismal function has resulted in the use of inbred populations of laboratory animals in which these mechanisms can be most rigorously studied. Finally, emphasis on the function of fully developed or adult organisms has been accompanied by a relative neglect of developmental processes. Disregard for the environment, for variation, and for development has made possible major advances in our knowledge of physiological mechanisms but has led to an impoverished concept of organisms. Incorporation of evolutionary, ecological, and developmental perspectives into the study of organisms might help to unite physiology more closely with the other biological sciences and lead to a richer and fuller understanding of organisms.

Key words

Claude Bernard development environment homeostasis internal environment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barcroft, J. (1934) Features in the Architecture of Physiological Function, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, C. (1865) Introduction a l’Étude de la Médecine Expérimentale, Paris, J.-B. Bailliére. English translation: An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (Green, H. C., tr.), New York, Dover, 1957Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, C. (1878) Leçons sur les Phénomènes de la Vie communs aux Animaux et aux Vegetaux, Paris, J.-B. Bailliére. English translation: Lectures on the Phenomena of Life Common to Animals and Plants (Hoff, H. E., Guillemin, R., and Guillemin, L., tr.), Springfield, IL, Thomas, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Boesiger, E. (1980) Evolutionary biology in France at the time of the evolutionary synthesis. In The Evolutionary Synthesis (Mayr, E., and Provine, W. B., eds.), Cambridge, MA, Harvard, pp. 309–321.Google Scholar
  5. Cannon, W. B. (1929) Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 9, 399–431.Google Scholar
  6. Close, B. T. (1993) The Wistar Rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. J. Hist. Biol. 26, 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, W. (1985): The cognitive basis of the discipline: Claude Bernard on physiology. Isis 76, 49–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1872) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, London, Appleton.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Grmek, M. (1973) Bernard, Claude. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography (Gillespie, C. C., ed.), New York, Scribners, vol. 2, pp. 24–34.Google Scholar
  11. Halberg, F. (1967) Claude Bernard and the “extreme variability of the internal milieu.” In Claude Bernard and Experimental Medicine (Grande, F., and Visscher, M. B., eds.), Cambridge, MA, Schenkman.Google Scholar
  12. Haldane, J. S. (1931) The Philosophical Basis of Biology, Garden City, NY, Doubleday, Doran & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Mayr, E. (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134, 1501–1506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Riese, W. (1943) Claude Bernard in the light of modern science. Bull. Hist. Med. 14, 281–294.Google Scholar
  15. Roll-Hansen (1976) Critical teleology: Immanuel Kant and Claude Bernard on the limitations of experimental biology. J. Hist. Biol. 9, 59–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schiller, J. (1968) Physiology’s struggle for independence in the first half of the nineteenth century. Hist. Sci. 7, 64–89.Google Scholar
  17. Silverthorn, D.U. (1998) Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Vander, A., Sherman, J., and Luciano, D. (1998) Human Physiology, 7th Ed., Boston, WCB/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Virchow, R. (1858) Die Cellularpathologie, Berlin, Hirschwald. English translation: Cellular Pathology (Chance, F., tr.), New York, Dover, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Fischer Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics (MC 5058)The University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations