Advertisement

Operations Management Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1–2, pp 19–31 | Cite as

Supply chain quality management practices and performance: An empirical study

  • Jing Zeng
  • Chi Anh Phan
  • Yoshiki Matsui
Article

Abstract

This study proposed a conceptual framework to study the relationships among three dimensions of supply chain quality management (SCQM) – in-house quality management practices (internal QM), interaction for quality with suppliers on the upstream side of supply chain (upstream QM), and interaction for quality with customers on the downstream side of supply chain (downstream QM) – and their impact on two types of quality performance (conformance quality, and customer satisfaction). Survey data were collected from 238 plants in three industries across eight countries and structural equation modeling was used to test this framework. The results indicate a dominant role of the internal QM in SCQM which has a positive impact on the other SCQM dimensions and two types of quality performance. Downstream QM is found to mediate the relationship between internal QM and customer satisfaction, while there is a lack of direct impact of upstream QM on either type of quality performance.

Keywords

Supply chain Quality management Quality performance Empirical study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support for this research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, No. 22330112.

References

  1. Adam EE Jr, Corbett LM, Flores BE, Harrison NJ, Lee TS, Rho BH, Ribera J, Samson D, Westbrook R (1997) An international study of quality improvement approach and firm performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 17:842–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahire SL, Dreyfus P (2000) The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical examination. J Oper Manage 18:549–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahire SL, O’Shaughnessy KC (1998) The role of top management commitment in quality management: an empirical analysis of the auto parts industry. Int J Qual Sci 3:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahire SL, Golhar DY, Waller MA (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci 27:23–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JC, Rungtusanatham M, Schroeder RG, Devaraj S (1995) A path analytic model of a theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method: preliminary empirical findings. Decis Sci 26:637–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arauz R, Matsuo H, Suzuki H (2009) Measuring changes in quality management: an empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturing companies. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 20:1337–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne M, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter JR, Ellram LM (1994) The impact of inter-organizational alliances in improving supplier quality. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 24:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi TY, Eboch K (1998) The TQM paradox: relations among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction. J Oper Manage 17:59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deming WE (1986) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Dröge C, Jayaram J, Vickery S (2004) The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. J Oper Manage 22:557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flynn BB, Flynn EJ (2005) Synergies between supply chain management and quality management: emerging implications. Int J Prod Res 43:3421–3436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1994) A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J Oper Manage 11:339–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1995) The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decis Sci 26:659–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forker LB, Mendez D, Hershauer JC (1997) Total quality management in the supply chain: what is its impact on performance. Int J Prod Res 35:1681–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forza C (1996) Achieving superior operating performance from integrated pipeline management: an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 26:36–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forza C, Filippini R (1998) TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: a causal model. Int J Prod Econ 55:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster ST (2008) Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management. J Oper Manage 26:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster ST, Ogden J (2008) On differences in how operations and supply chain managers approach quality management. Int J Prod Res 46:6945–6961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fynes B, Voss C, Búrca SD (2005) The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. Int J Prod Econ 96:339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garvin DA (1984) Japanese quality management. Columbia J World Bus 19:3–12Google Scholar
  23. Hillebrand B, Biemans WG (2003) The relationship between internal and external cooperation: literature review and propositions. J Bus Res 56:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu L, Bentler PM (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH (ed) SEM concepts, issues and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 76–99Google Scholar
  25. Juran JM (1992) Juran on quality by design – the new steps for planning quality into goods and services. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaynak H (2003) The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J Oper Manage 21:405–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaynak H, Hartley JL (2008) A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain. J Oper Manage 26:468–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King WR, Teo TSH (1997) Integration between business planning and information systems planning: validating a stage hypothesis. Decis Sci 28:279–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koufteros X, Vonderembse M, Jayaram J (2005) Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effect of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decis Sci 36:97–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuei C, Madu CN, Lin C (2001) The relationship between supply chain quality management practices and organizational performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 18:864–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuei C, Madu CN, Lin C, Chow WS (2002) Developing supply chain strategies based on the survey of supply chain quality and technology management. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 19:889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai K, Cheng TCE, Yeung ACL (2005) Relationship stability and supplier commitment to quality. Int J Prod Econ 96: 397–410Google Scholar
  33. Levy P (1998) Total quality management in the supply chain. In: Madu CN (ed) Handbook of TQM. Kluwer, London, pp 275–303Google Scholar
  34. Li SH, Ragu-Nathan B, Ragu-Nathan TS, Rao SS (2006) The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega 34:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin C, Chow WS, Madu CN, Kuei C, Yu PP (2005) A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 96:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Long JS (1983) Confirmatory factor analysis. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, p 75Google Scholar
  37. Park S, Hartley JL, Wilson D (2001) Quality management practices and their relationship to buyer’s supplier ratings: a study in the Korean automotive industry. J Oper Manage 19:695–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell TC (1995) Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strateg Manage J 16:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robinson C, Malhotra M (2005) Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. Int J Prod Econ 96:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romano P, Vinelli A (2001) Quality management in a supply chain perspective: strategic and operative choices in a textile-apparel network. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ross DF (1998) Competing through Supply Chain Management. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rungtusanatham M, Salvador F, Forza C, Choi TY (2003) Supply-chain linkages and operational performance: a resource-based perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage 23:1084–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salvador F, Forza C, Rungtusanatham M, Choi TY (2001) Supply chain interactions and time-related performances, an operations management perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21:461–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Samson D, Terziovski M (1999) The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J Oper Manage 17:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saraph JV, Benson PG, Schroeder RG (1989) An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decis Sci 20:810–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schonberger RJ (2007) Japanese production management: an evolution – with mixed success. J Oper Manage 25:403–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schroeder RG, Flynn BB (2001) High performance manufacturing: global perspectives. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Shin H, Collier DA, Wilson DD (2000) Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. J Oper Manage 18:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sila I, Ebrahimpour M, Birkholz C (2006) Quality in supply chains: an empirical analysis. Suppl Chain Manage Int J 11:491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snell SA, Dean JW Jr (1992) Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Acad Manag J 35:467–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tan KC, Handfield RB, Krause DR (1998) Enhancing the firm’s performance through quality and supply base management: an empirical study. Int J Prod Res 36:2813–2837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tan KC, Kannan VR, Handfield RB, Ghosh S (1999) Supply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 19:1034–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tracey M, Tan CL (2001) Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Suppl Chain Manage Int J 6:174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trent RJ, Monczka RM (1999) Achieving world-class supplier quality. Total Qual Manage 10:927–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Graduate School of Social SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Department: Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of Economics and Business - Vietnam National University, HanoiHanoiVietnam
  3. 3.Faculty of Business AdministrationYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations