Operations Management Research

, Volume 2, Issue 1–4, pp 13–27 | Cite as

Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: A goal theoretic perspective

  • James R. Langabeer
  • Jami L. DelliFraine
  • Janelle Heineke
  • Ibrahim Abbass
Article

Abstract

Organizational quality improvement practices have gained wide acceptance in manufacturing industries over the last several decades. A substantial number of books have been written on Lean and Six Sigma alone, which today are the leading improvement initiatives. The healthcare industry however has been slower to adopt these methods, although anecdotal evidence suggests they are now being gradually diffused throughout hospitals on an increasing basis. Yet, these new practices have been developed substantially without a theoretical foundation (Linderman et al. J Oper Manag 21:193–203, 2003) and the question of industry “fit” is the topic of debate for many physicians and administrators (Kassirer N Engl J Med 339:1543–1545, 1998). This article provides the descriptive results from our mixed methods research, combining survey questionnaire with semi-structured interviews, that examines implementation of two quality improvement initiatives (Lean and Six Sigma) in a cross-sectional sample of hospitals. We used correlations and non-parametric tests to examine relationships between goal attainment and quality management, and present descriptive findings about reported usage and adoption of quality initiatives. Importantly, we find that the efficacy of quality improvement initiatives in healthcare may be impeded by the lack of goal clarity and measurement. We build on these initial results by offering recommendations to improve results in practice, as well as an agenda for further research of quality initiatives in healthcare. The objectives of our research are to better understand how Lean and Six Sigma fit in the healthcare industry and to explore goal and value attainment from these projects.

Keywords

Quality Six Sigma Lean Goal theory Healthcare 

References

  1. Adams R, Warner P, Hubbard B, Goulding T (2004) Decreasing turnaround time between general surgery cases. J Nurs Adm 34:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahire P, Golhar D, Waller M (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci 27:23–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Assaf AF, Assaf R (1997) Managed care quality: a practical guide. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander J, Weiner B, Griffith J (2006) Quality improvement and hospital financial performance. J Organ Behav 27:1003–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barsness ZI, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, et al (1993) The quality march: national survey profiles quality improvement activities. Hosp Health Network December 67(23):52–55Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham JE, Bennett DM et al (2008) Redesigning care at the Flinders Medical Centre: clinical process redesign using “lean thinking”. Med J Aust 188:S27–S31Google Scholar
  7. Black K, Revere L (2006) Six Sigma arises from the ashes of TQM with a twist. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 19:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer GA, Selden SC (2000) Why elephants gallop: assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. J Public Adm Res Theory 10:685–712Google Scholar
  9. Buck C (2001) Application of Six Sigma to reduce medical errors. Annu Qual Congr P 55:739–742Google Scholar
  10. Bush SH, Lao MR, Simmons KL et al (2007) Patient access and clinical efficiency improvement in a resident hospital-based women’s medicine center clinic. Am J Manag Care 13:686–690Google Scholar
  11. Carrigan MD, Kujawa D (2006) Six Sigma in health care management and strategy. Health Care Manag 25:133–141Google Scholar
  12. Chan ALF, Pharm BS (2004) Use of Six Sigma to improve pharmacist dispensing errors at an outpatient clinic. Am J Med Qual 19:128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan WP, Chiu W, Chen W et al (2005) Applying Six Sigma methodology to maximize magnetic resonance imaging capacity in a hospital. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 6:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chassin MR (1998) Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q 76:565–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chassin R (2008) The Six Sigma initiative at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Mount Sinai J Med 75:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Lin J, Chang C (2005) Taiwan: improving radiography through application of Six Sigma techniques. J Health Qual 27:44–52Google Scholar
  17. Christianson JB, Warrick LH, Howard R, Vollum J (2005) Deploying Six Sigma in a health care system as a work in progress. J Qual Patient Saf 31:603–613Google Scholar
  18. Daniels SE (2007) Six Sigma at Cigna. Qual Prog 40:43–48Google Scholar
  19. Dickson EW, Singh S, Cheung DS et al (2008) Application of Lean manufacturing techniques in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 11:1–6Google Scholar
  20. Does RJ, Vermaat TM, Verver JP et al (2009) Reducing start time delays in operating rooms. J Qual Technol 41:95–109Google Scholar
  21. Dow D, Samson D, Ford S (1999) Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Prod Oper Manag 8:1–27Google Scholar
  22. Drenckpohl D, Bowers L, Cooper H (2007) Use of the Six Sigma methodology to reduce incidence of breast milk administration errors in the NICU. Neonatal Netw 26:161–166Google Scholar
  23. Elberfeld A, Goodman K, Van Kooy M (2004) Using the Six Sigma approach to meet quality standards for cardiac medication administration. J Clin Outcomes Manag 11:510–516Google Scholar
  24. Eldridge NE, Woods SS, Bonello RS et al (2006) Using the Six Sigma process to implement the centers for disease control and prevention guideline for hand hygiene in 4 intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med 21:S35–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esimai G (2005) Lean Six Sigma reduces medication errors. Qual Prog 38:51–57Google Scholar
  26. Fairbanks C (2007) Using Six Sigma and Lean methodologies to improve OR throughput. AORN J 86:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson JW, Tesone D (2001) Management fads: emergence, evolution, and implications for managers. Acad Manag Exec 15:122–133Google Scholar
  28. Godin E, Raven D, Sweetapple C, Del Giudice FR (2004) Faster test results. Qual Prog 37:33–39Google Scholar
  29. Gorman A, Donnell L, Hepp H, Mack T (2007) Improving communication and documentation concerning preliminary and final radiology reports. J Healthc Qual. Available via: http://www.nahq.org/journal/ce/article.html?article_id=276. Accessed August 15, 2009
  30. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) (2009) Available via: http://www.himss.org/ASP/membershipHome.asp. Accessed on August 16, 2009
  31. Hendricks K, Singhal V (2001) Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance. J Oper Manag 19:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson T, Currie G, Keill P et al (2005) New York-Presbyterian Hospital: translating innovation into practice. J Qual Patient Saf 31:554–560Google Scholar
  33. Johnston R, Michel S (2008) Three outcomes of service recovery; customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Int J Oper Prod Manage 28:79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joint Commission (2009) National Patient Safety Goals. Available via: http://www.jointcommission.org/patientsafety/nationalpatientsafetygoals/. Accessed August 16, 2009
  35. Kang JO, Kim MH, Hong SE et al (2005) The application of the Six Sigma program for the quality management of the PACS. Am J Roentgenol 185:1361–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kassirer JP (1998) Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med 339:1543–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly A, Bryant M, Cox L, Jolley D (2007) Improving emergency department efficiency by patient streaming to outcomes-based teams. Aust Health Rev 31:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lam MY, Poon GKK, Chin KS (2008) An organizational learning model for vocational education in the context of TQM culture. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 25:238–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Landy FJ (1989) The psychology of work behavior. Brooks-Cole, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  40. Latham GP, Yukl GA (1975) A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Acad Manage J 18:824–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LeBlanc F, McLaughlin S, Freedman J et al (2004) A Six Sigma approach to maximizing productivity in the cardiac cath lab. J Cardiovasc Manag 15:19–24Google Scholar
  42. Leslie M, Hagood C, Royer A et al (2006) Using lean methods to improve OR turnover times. AORN 84:849–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Linderman K, Schroeder R, Zaheer S, Choo A (2003) Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manag 21:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Linderman K, Schroeder R, Choo A (2005) Six Sigma: the role of goals in improvement teams. J Oper Manag 21:779–790Google Scholar
  45. Locke EA (1970) Job satisfaction and job performance: a theoretical analysis. Organ Behav Hum Perform 3:157–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  47. Locke EA, Shaw K, Saari L, Latham G (1981) Goal setting and task performance. Psychol Bull 90:125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin WF (2007) Quality models: selecting the best model to deliver results. Physician Exec 33:24–29Google Scholar
  49. Neri RA, Mason CE, Demko LA (2008) Application of Six Sigma/CAP methodology: controlling blood-product utilization and costs. J Healthc Manag 53:183–196Google Scholar
  50. Perry JL, Porter LW (1982) Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Acad Manag Rev 7:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Printezis A, Gopalakrishnan M (2007) Current pulse: can a production system reduce medical errors in health care? Qual Manag Health Care 16:226–238Google Scholar
  52. Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Stewart WR et al (2008) Effect of Lean method implementation in the histopathology section of an anatomical pathology laboratory. J Clin Pathol 61:1193–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodgers R, Hunter JE (1992) A foundation of good management practice in government: management by objectives. Public Admin Rev 52:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saraph J, Benson P, Schroeder R (1989) An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality. Decis Sci 20:810–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Zhang D (2005) Evolution of quality: first fifty issues of production and operations management. Prod Oper Manag 14:468–481Google Scholar
  56. Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manag 26:236–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shipton H, Armstrong C, West M, Dawson J (2008) The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. Int J Qual Health Care 20:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shortell S, O’Brien J, Hughes E et al (1994) Assessing the progress of TQM in US hospitals: findings from two studies. Qual Lett Healthc Lead 6:14–17Google Scholar
  59. Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR (1998) Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q 76:593–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stamatis DH (2000) Who needs Six Sigma, anyway? Qual Digest. Available via: http://www.qualitydigest.com/may00/html/sixsigmacon.html. Accessed August 15, 2009
  61. Tsasis P, Bruce-Barrett C (2008) Organizational change through Lean thinking. Health Serv Manag Res 21:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van den Heuvel J, Does RJ, Bogers AJ, Berg M (2006) Implementing Six Sigma in the Netherlands. J Qual Patient Saf 32:393–399Google Scholar
  63. Wilk LA, Redmon WK (1990) A daily-adjusted goal-setting and feedback procedure for improving productivity in a university admissions office. J Organ Behav Manage 11:55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright BE (2004) The role of work context in work motivation: a public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. J Public Admin Res Theor 14:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright PM, Kacmar KM (1994) Goal specificity as determinant of goal commitment and goal change. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 59:242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yukl GA, Latham GP (1978) Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Pers Psychol 31:305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Langabeer
    • 1
  • Jami L. DelliFraine
    • 1
  • Janelle Heineke
    • 2
  • Ibrahim Abbass
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations